Yoshida M, Yabuuchi Y, Kakushima N, et al. The incidence of non-ampullary duodenal cancer in Japan: the first analysis of a national cancer registry. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36:1216–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakagawa K, Sho M, Fujishiro M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for duodenal cancer 2021. J Gastroenterol. 2022;57:927–41.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y, et al. Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:635–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yahagi N, Kato M, Ochiai Y, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:676–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kato M, Sasaki M, Mizutani M, et al. Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD. Endosc Int Open. 2019;07:E1755–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kato M, Takeuchi Y, Hoteya S, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal tumors: 10 years’ experience in 18 Japanese high volume centers. Endoscopy. 2021;54:663–70.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoteya S, Furuhata T, Takahito T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumor. Digestion. 2017;95:36–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Dou L, Liu Y, et al. The value of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal lesions: a single-center experience. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_646_20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Maselli R, Alkandari AA, Spadaccini M, et al. Sporadic non-ampullary duodenal adenomas: efficacy and outcomes of endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:5224–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matsuda Y, Sakamoto K, Kataoka N, et al. Perforation associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal neoplasm without a papillary portion. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9:161–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Quénéhervé L, Margos W, et al. Comparative analysis of ESD versus EMR in a large European series of non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors. Endosc Int Open. 2018;06:E1008–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hirasawa K, Ozeki Y, Sawada A, et al. Appropriate endoscopic treatment selection and surveillance for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;56:342–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Queneherve L, Margos W, et al. ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6:E998–1007.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, Mckenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen BAJ, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline—update 2022. Endoscopy. 2022;54:591–622.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vanbiervliet G, Strijker M, Arvanitakis M, et al. Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2021;53:429–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294–302.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–94.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Inoue T, Uedo N, Yamashina T, et al. Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non‐ampullary duodenal neoplasm. Dig Endosc. 2013;26:220–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamamoto Y, Yoshizawa N, Tomida H, et al. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial non‐ampullary duodenal tumor. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:50–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hara Y, Goda K, Dobashi A, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopically treated superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:707–18.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zou J, Chai N, Linghu E, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal laterally spreading tumors. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:4048–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esaki M, Haraguchi K, Akahoshi K, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;12:918–30.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hwang KL, Kim GH, Lee BE, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: a single-center experience. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2020;31:49–57.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Na HK, Kim DH, Ahn JY, et al. Clinical outcomes following endoscopic treatment for sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenoma. Dig Dis. 2020;38:364–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanzaki H, Matsueda K, Nakagawa M, et al. Clinical characteristics and course of sporadic non-ampullary duodenal adenomas. Medicine. 2021;100:e27382.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fukuhara S, Kato M, Iwasaki E, et al. Management of perforation related to endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:1129–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dohi O, Kato M, Takeuchi Y, et al. Clinical course and management of adverse events after endoscopic resection of superficial duodenal epithelial tumors: multicenter retrospective study. Dig Endosc. 2023;35:879–88.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, et al. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017;66:1779–89.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsutsumi K, Kato M, Kakushima N, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic preventive procedures to reduce delayed adverse events after endoscopic resection of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: a meta-analysis of observational comparative trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93:367–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yahagi N, Nishizawa T, Akimoto T, et al. New endoscopic suturing method: string clip suturing method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1064–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doyama H, Tominaga K, Yoshida N, et al. Endoscopic tissue shielding with polyglycolic acid sheets, fibrin glue and clips to prevent delayed perforation after duodenal endoscopic resection. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:41–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fukuhara S, Kato M, Iwasaki E, et al. External drainage of bile and pancreatic juice after endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal neoplasm: Feasibility study (with video). Dig Endosc. 2021;33:977–84.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yahagi N, Nishizawa T, Sasaki M, et al. Water pressure method for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2017;49:E227–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tashima T, Miyaguchi K, Terada R, et al. Gel immersion endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel gel product for a duodenal epithelial tumor. Endoscopy. 2022;54:E162–3.