Vasavada S et al (2024) What’s in a name? A historical perspective on the change of the name of our specialty from Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) to Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS). Neurourol Urodyn 43:1477–1478. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25512

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tim S et al (2021) The most common functional disorders and factors affecting female pelvic floor. Life (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/life11121397

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Terefe A. Benti et al (2022) Determinants of pelvic floor disorders among women visiting the gynecology outpatient department in Wolkite University Specialized Center, Wolkite, Ethiopia. Obstet Gynecol Int 2022:6949700. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6949700

Article  Google Scholar 

Wu JM et al (2014) Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol 123:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000057

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Islam RM et al (2019) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling women in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 30:2001–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03992-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dieter AA et al (2015) Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 27:380–384. https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000200

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Daykan Y et al (2023) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery: review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 91:102418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102418

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sussman RD et al (2019) The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Türk J Urol 45:331–339. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.19068

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ng JY et al (2025) Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine. Integr Med Res 14:101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2025.101181

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guo X et al (2023) Global research status and trends in orthopaedic surgical robotics: a bibliometric and visualisation analysis study. J Robot Surg 17:1743–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01579-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y et al (2023) Exploring acceptable risk in engineering and operations research and management science by bibliometric analysis. Risk Anal 43:1539–1556. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Eck NJ et al (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen C et al (2019) Visualizing a field of research: a methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS One 14:e0223994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Robinson DBT et al (2019) Relative value of adapted novel bibliometrics in evaluating surgical academic impact and reach. World J Surg 43:967–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-04893-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giannini A et al (2019) Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction. Minerva Ginecol 71:4–17. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4784.18.04331-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shen L et al (2019) Detecting the interdisciplinary nature and topic hotspots of robotics in surgery: social network analysis and bibliometric study. J Med Internet Res 21:e12625. https://doi.org/10.2196/12625

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hegde A (2023) Evolution of urogynecology training worldwide and the Cama experience. Int Urogynecol J 34:2337–2340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05659-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xiao P et al (2024) Global research hotspots and trends on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer. Front Surg 11:1308489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1308489

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Levy G et al (2024) A roadmap for training in urogynecology: IUGA international initiative. Int Urogynecol J 35:1131–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05789-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mehta A et al (2022) Embracing robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: potential benefits, challenges, and scope in the future. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 84:104803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104803

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jefferson FA et al (2024) Perioperative outcomes of vesicovaginal fistula repair by surgical approach. Urogynecology 30:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001394

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Linder BJ et al (2016) Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 27:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2816-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paraiso MFR et al (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geller EJ et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112:1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bendels MHK et al (2018) Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PLoS One 13:e0189136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189136

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gupta A et al (2020) Citation classics: the 100 most cited articles in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J 31:249–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04021-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tam TY et al (2020) Female patient preferences regarding physician gender: a national survey. Minerva Ginecol 72:25–29. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4784.20.04502-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steers WD (2013) Establishing the subspecialty of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery in the United States of America. Arab J Urol 11:113–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2013.01.003

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brubaker L (2022) Editorial- urogynecology. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 28:398–399. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001208

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsoi H et al (2023) Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology. Ther Adv Urol 15:17562872231213728. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231213727

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chang CL et al (2022) Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 33:297–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04741-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang CL et al (2022) An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for managing pelvic organ prolapse. J Robot Surg 16:1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01329-x

Article  PubMed