Aaronson, N.K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N.J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., et al.: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85(5), 365–376 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/855

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdin, E., Chong, S.A., Seow, E., Peh, C.X., Tan, J.H., Liu, J., Hui, S.F.S., Chua, B.Y., et al.: A comparison of the reliability and validity of SF-6D, EQ-5D and HUI3 utility measures in patients with schizophrenia and patients with depression in Singapore. Psychiatr. Res. 274, 400–408 (2019)

Article  Google Scholar 

Ameri, H., Poder, T.G.: Valuing SF-6Dv2 using a discrete choice experiment in a general population in Quebec, Canada. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 13, 8404 (2024)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 47(8), 931–936 (2010)

Article  Google Scholar 

Brazier, J.E., Roberts, J.: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med. Care 42(9), 851–859 (2004)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brazier, J., Roberts, J., Deverill, M.: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J. Health Econ. 21(2), 271–292 (2002)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Saloman, J., Tsuchiya, A.: Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017)

Google Scholar 

Brazier, J.E., Mulhern, B.J., Bjorner, J.B., Gandek, B., Rowen, D., Alonso, J., Vilagut, G., Ware, J.E.: Developing a new version of the SF-6D health state classification system from the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2. Med. Care 58(6), 557–565 (2020)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cadth, Z.: Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies. CADTH Ottawa, Canada (2017)

Google Scholar 

Cella, D.F., Tulsky, D.S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S.B., et al.: The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J. Clin. Oncol. 11(3), 570–579 (1993)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge, London (2013)

Book  Google Scholar 

Daroudi, R., Zeraati, H., Poder, T.G., Norman, R., Olyaeemanesh, A., Sari, A.A., Ameri, H.: Valuing the SF-6Dv2 in the capital of Iran using a discrete choice experiment with duration. Qual. Life Res. 33(7), 1853–1863 (2024)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deyo, R.A., Diehr, P., Patrick, D.L.: Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control. Clin. Trials 12(4), S142–S158 (1991)

Article  Google Scholar 

Farag, I., Sherrington, C., Kamper, S., Ferreira, M., Moseley, A., Lord, S., Cameron, I.: Measures of physical functioning after hip fracture: construct validity and responsiveness of performance-based and self-reported measures. Age Ageing 41(5), 659–664 (2012)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feng, Y.-S., Kohlmann, T., Janssen, M.F., Buchholz, I.: Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual. Life Res. 30, 647–673 (2021)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finch, A.P., Brazier, J.E., Mukuria, C.: What is the evidence for the performance of generic preference-based measures? A systematic overview of reviews. Eur. J. Health Econ. 19, 557–570 (2018)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gaujoux-Viala, C., Rat, A.-C., Guillemin, F., Flipo, R.-M., Fardellone, P., Bourgeois, P., Fautrel, B.: Responsiveness of EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 71(9), 1478–1483 (2012)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Group TE: EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3), 199–208 (1990)

Article  Google Scholar 

Guyatt, G.H., Feeny, D.H., Patrick, D.L.: Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann. Intern. Med. 118(8), 622–629 (1993)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hays, R.D., Kallich, J.D., Mapes, D.L., Coons, S.J., Carter, W.B.: Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOLTM) instrument. Qual. Life Res. 3(5), 329–338 (1994)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., Badia, X.: Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual. Life Res. 20, 1727–1736 (2011)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G.: The health utilities index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 1, 1–13 (2003)

Article  Google Scholar 

Kularatna, S., Senanayake, S., Gunawardena, N., Graves, N.: Comparison of the EQ-5D 3L and the SF-6D (SF-36) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with chronic kidney disease in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 9(2), e024854 (2019)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li, M., Fang, B., Gu, H., Jiang, Y.: EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 health utilities scores of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 22(1), 80 (2024)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McHorney, C.A., Tarlov, A.R.: Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual. Life Res. 4(4), 293–307 (1995)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McHugh, M.L.: Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 22(3), 276–282 (2012)

Article  Google Scholar 

McTaggart-Cowan, H., King, M.T., Norman, R., Costa, D.S., Pickard, A.S., Regier, D.A., Viney, R., Peacock, S.J.: The EORTC QLU-C10D: the Canadian valuation study and algorithm to derive cancer-specific utilities from the EORTC QLQ-C30. MDM Policy Pract. 4(1), 2381468319842532 (2019)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McTaggart-Cowan, H., King, M.T., Norman, R., Costa, D.S., Pickard, A.S., Viney, R., Peacock, S.J., Dean CMTCKHJLNMNR: The FACT-8D, a new cancer-specific utility algorithm based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies-General (FACT-G): a Canadian valuation study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 20(1), 97 (2022)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moradi, N., Poder, T.G., Safari, H., Mojahedian, M.M., Ameri, H.: Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared with EQ-5D-3L in cancer patients in Iran. Front. Oncol. 12, 1052155 (2022)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mulhern, B., Norman, R., Brazier, J.: Valuing SF-6Dv2 in Australia using an international protocol. Pharmacoeconomics 39, 1151–1162 (2021)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nahvijou, A., Safari, H., Ameri, H.: Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D-5L with two versions of the SF-6Dv2 in patients with breast cancer. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 20, 183–194 (2020)

Article  Google Scholar 

Nahvijou, A., Safari, H., Ameri, H.: Psychometric properties of the SF-6Dv2 in an Iranian breast cancer population. Breast Cancer 28, 937–943 (2021)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norman, G.R., Sloan, J.A., Wyrwich, K.W.: Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med. Care 41(5), 582–592 (2003)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patrick, D.L., Deyo, R.A.: Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med. Care 27(3), S217–S232 (1989)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pilz, M.J., Seyringer, S., Nerich, V., King, M.T., Norman, R., Gamper, E.M., Group EQoL: Validation of the cancer-specific preference-based measure EORTC QLU-C10D against the generic instruments EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in a prospectively collected sample of patients with cancer in Austria and France. Pharmacoeconomics (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01501-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Poder, T.G., Carrier, N., McFadden, N., Pavic, M.: Health utilities in cancer patients: a study protocol for a prospective, longitudinal cohort using online survey. Medicine 98(9), e14647 (2019)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar