Comparative evaluation of feature-based and intensity-based algorithms for dosimetric registration in radiotherapy quality assurance using electronic portal imaging devices

Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218. Med Phys. 2018;45(4):e53–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/MP.12810.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998;25(5):656–61. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598248.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diamantopoulos S, Platoni K, Patatoukas G, Karaiskos P, Kouloulias V, Efstathopoulos E. Treatment plan verification: a review on the comparison of dose distributions. Phys Med. 2019;67:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.029.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hussein M, Clark CH, Nisbet A. Challenges in calculation of the gamma index in radiotherapy—towards good practice. Phys Med. 2017;36:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.001.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dvorak P. Clinical radiotherapy physics with MATLAB: a problem-solving approach. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.

Book  Google Scholar 

Low DA. Gamma dose distribution evaluation tool. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2010;250:349–59. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012071.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Huang JY, Pulliam KB, McKenzie EM, Followill DS, Kry SF. Effects of spatial resolution and noise on gamma analysis for IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(4):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4690.

Article  Google Scholar 

Woon W, Ravindran PB, Ekanayake P, Vikraman S, Lim YYF, Khalid J. A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(2):230–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12285.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stasi M, Bresciani S, Miranti A, Maggio A, Sapino V, Gabriele P. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram. Med Phys. 2012;39(12):7626–34. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4767763.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aristophanous M, Suh Y, Chi PC, Whittlesey LJ, LaNeave S, Martel MK. Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(5):20–33. https://doi.org/10.1120/JACMP.V17I5.6118.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhen H, Nelms BE, Tomé WA. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA. Med Phys. 2011;38(10):5477–89. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3633904.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang SB, Sharp GC, Neicu T, Berbeco RI, Flampouri S, Bortfeld T. On dose distribution comparison. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(4):759–76. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bakai A, Alber M, Nüsslin F. A revision of the gamma-evaluation concept for the comparison of dose distributions. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48(21):3543–53. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/21/006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blanpain B, Mercier D. The delta envelope: a technique for dose distribution comparison. Med Phys. 2009;36(3):797–808. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3070546.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang Y, Zhou S, Shang P, Qi E, Wu S, Xie Y. Contour propagation using feature-based deformable registration for lung cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:172. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/701514.

Article  Google Scholar 

Oh S, Kim S. Deformable image registration in radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol J. 2017;35(2):101–11. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00325.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rigaud B, et al. Deformable image registration for radiation therapy: principle, methods, applications and evaluation. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(9):1225–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1620331.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xiao H, Ren G, Cai J. A review on 3D deformable image registration and its application in dose warping. Radiat Med Prot. 2020;1(4):171–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmp.2020.11.002.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brock KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR, Li H, Kessler ML. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. Med Phys. 2017;44(7):e43–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12256.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Swamidas J, Kirisits C, De Brabandere M, Hellebust TP, Siebert FA, Tanderup K. Image registration, contour propagation and dose accumulation of external beam and brachytherapy in gynecological radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2020;143:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.023.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bellahsaouia M, et al. Dose distribution comparison using image registration principles. Nucl Anal. 2025;4(2):100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucana.2025.100170.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lowe DG. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis. 2004;60(2):91–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1989;11(6):567–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.24792.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rueckert D. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999;18(8):712–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.796284.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thirion JP. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell’s demons. Med Image Anal. 1998;2(3):243–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80022-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zitová B, Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput. 2003;21(11):977–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mattes D, Haynor DR, Vesselle H, Lewellen TK, Eubank W. PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(1):120–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2003.809072.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Innolitics. All CIODs—DICOM standard browser. https://dicom.innolitics.com/ciods. Accessed 29 June 2025.

Law MYY, Liu B. DICOM-RT and its utilization in radiation therapy. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):655–67. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.293075172.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):282. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031.

Article  Google Scholar 

Powers DMW. Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. Int J Mach Learn Technol. 2020;2(1):37–63.

Google Scholar 

Brock KK. Image processing in radiation therapy. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.

Google Scholar 

Van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14(1):52–64. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dogan N, et al. AAPM Task Group Report 307: use of EPIDs for patient-specific IMRT and VMAT QA. Med Phys. 2023;50(8):e865–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16536.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif