Okazaki S, Murata M, Kitamoto Y. Current situation and rends of radiation therapy in Japan based on the National Database Open Data. J Radiat Res. 2024;65:864–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrae078.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Borras JM, Lievens Y, Barton M, et al. How many new cancer patients in EUROPE will require radiotherapy by 2025? An ESTRO-HERO analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.016.
Bryant AK, Banegas MP, Martinez ME, et al. Trends in radiation therapy among cancer survivors in the United States, 2000–2030. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:963–70. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1023.
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0.
Wang K, Tepper JE. Radiation therapy-associated toxicity: etiology, management, and prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:437–54. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21689.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. IAEA Safety Standards Series. Vienna: IAEA; 2014. https://doi.org/10.61092/iaea.u2pu-60vm.
Vano E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, et al. ICRP publication 135: Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP. 2017;46:1–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317717209.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 26. Ann. ICRP. Ottawa: ICRP; 1977. p. 1.
ICRP. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP. Ottawa: ICRP; 1991;21.
ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Ottawa. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP. ICRP; 2007. p. 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003.
ICRP. Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann. ICRP. Ottawa: ICRP. 1996;26.
ICRP. Radiation and your patient – A Guide for Medical Practitioners. ICRP Supporting Guidance 2. Ann. ICRP. Ottawa: ICRP; 2001. p. 31.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Enforcement of the Ministerial Ordinance Partially Amending the Enforcement Regulations of the Medical Care Act. Notification No. 0312-7. 12 Mar 2019. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000137802_00005.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2025.
Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO), Medical Safety Committee, Subcommittee on Image-Guided Radiation Therapy. Response of the Radiation Oncology Department to the Partial Revision of the Enforcement Regulations of the Medical Care Act. JASTRO. 16. May 2020. https://www.jastro.or.jp/medicalpersonnel/safety/20200518.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2025.
Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure (J-RIME), Japan Radiological Physics Society (JRP), Japan Health Physics Society (JHPS), et al. National diagnostic reference levels in Japan et al. (2020) -Japan DRLs 2020-. 2020. https://j-rime.qst.go.jp/report/DRL2020_Engver.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2025.
J-RIME, National Diagnostic Reference Levels in Japan. (2025) - Japan DRLs 2025-. https://j-rime.qst.go.jp/report/JapanDRLs2025_en.pdf. Accessed 11 Jul 2025.
Kito S, Suda Y, Tanabe S, et al. Radiological imaging protection: a study on imaging dose used while planning computed tomography for external radiotherapy in Japan. J Radiat Res. 2024;65:159–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad098.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
ICRP. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87. Ann. ICRP. Ottawa: ICRP. 2000;30.
Dixon RL, Anderson JA, Bakalyar DM, et al. Comprehensive Methodology for the Evaluation of Radiation Dose in X-ray Computed Tomography. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 111, Report of AAPM Task Group 111: The Future of CT Dosimetry. American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2010.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment - Part 2–44: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC 60601-2-44, 3rd edition. Geneva:IEC; 2009.
IEC. Medical electrical equipment - Part 2–44: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC 60601-2-44:2009 + AMD1:2012 CSV, 3rd edition (consolidated version). Geneva:IEC; 2012.
Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations: Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park:AAPM; 2011. https://doi.org/10.37206/143
Yokomachi K, Nishimaru E, Fujioka C, et al. Effects of differences in head holder on image quality and radiation dose in head CT. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2014;70:1166–72. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2014_jsrt_70.10.1166.
Okamoto H, Kito S, Tohyama N, et al. Radiation protection in radiological imaging: a survey of imaging modalities used in Japanese institutions for verifying applicator placements in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. J Radiat Res. 2021;62:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa088.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
O’ Connor S, Mc Ardle O, Mullaney L, et al. Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for breast cancer CT protocols in radiation therapy. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20160428. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160428.
Clerkin C, Brennan S, Mullaney LM, et al. Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for radiotherapy localisation computer tomography of the head and neck. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018;23:407–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2018.07.012.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wood TJ, Davis AT, Earley J, et al. IPEM topical report: the first UK survey of dose indices from radiotherapy treatment planning computed tomography scans for adult patients. Phys Med Biol. 2018;10:63:185008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aacc87.
GOV.UK. National Diagnostic Reference Levels from 8 July 2025. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/ndrl. Accessed 13 Jul 2025.
Rao S, Kadavigere R, Sharan K, et al. Establishment of diagnostic reference level and radiation dose variation in head & neck and pelvis treatment planning in radiation therapy computed tomography. F1000Res. 2022;11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110966.2.
Božanić A, Šegota D, Dundara Debeljuh D, et al. National reference levels of CT procedures dedicated for treatment planning in radiation oncology. Phys Med. 2022;96:123–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.03.001.
Zalokar N, ZagerMarcius V, Mekis N. Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for radiotherapy computed tomography simulation procedures in Slovenia. Eur J Radiol. 2020;127:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108979.
Toroi P, Kaijaluoto S, Bly R. Patient exposure levels in radiotherapy CT simulations in Finland. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;167:602–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu363.
Guisantes R, Santos J, Ferreira AJ. Characterisation of Portuguese radiotherapy departments: Organisation, occupational exposure values and diagnostic reference levels for breast and prostate computed tomography planning. Radiography. 2024;30:932–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.007.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Semghouli S, EI Fahssi M, Choukri A, et al. Radiation risk during thoracic CT scan for diagnostic and radiotherapy planning procedures in Hassan II, Hospital, Agadir Morocco. Radioprotection. 2024;59:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024007.
Nhila O, Talbi M, Youssoufi MA, et al. Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for breast cancer CT protocols in radiotherapy in a single Moroccan center. Radioprotection. 2024;59:50–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023047.
Hasanpour E, Maziar A, Paydar R, et al. Establishment of regional diagnostic reference level for CT planning of breast cancer and comparing them with international values. Int J Radiat Res. 2024;22:999–1007. https://doi.org/10.61186/ijrr.22.4.999.
Mutic S, Palta JR, Butker EK, et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed tomography-simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 66. Med Phys. 2003;30:2762–92. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1609271.
Gervaise A, Osemont B, Lecocq S, et al. CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2271-7.
Rao S, Sharan K, Gururajarao S, et al. Advanced Computational Methods for Radiation Dose Optimization in CT. Diagnostics. 2024;14:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14090921.
Yasui K, Saito Y, Ito A, et al. Validation of deep learning–based CT image reconstruction for treatment planning. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42775-x.
Yasui K, Kasugai Y, Morishita M, et al. Dose reduction in radiotherapy treatment planning CT via deep learning–based reconstruction: a single–institution study. Radiol Phys Technol. 2025;18:1192–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00967-2.
Ding GX, Alaei P, Curran B, et al. Image guidance doses delivered during radiotherapy: Quantification, management, and reduction: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 180. Med Phys. 2018;45:e45–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12824.
Sanderud A, England A, Hogg P, et al. Radiation dose differences between thoracic radiotherapy planning CT and thoracic diagnostic CT scans. Radiography. 2015;22:107–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.08.003.
Comments (0)