United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2008 report to the General Assembly, volume 1: Annex A – Medical radiation exposures. New York: United Nations; 2010. pp. 26–7. https://doi.org/10.18356/cb7b6e26-en.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2021). Use of dose quantities in radiological protection (ICRP Publication 147). Annals of the ICRP, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645320911864
International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection (ICRP Publication 103). Ann ICRP. 2007;37:2–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003.
Brambilla M, Vassileva J, Kuchcinska A, et al. Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: Call for action. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:2493–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06528-7.
Brower C, Rehani MM. Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging. Br J Radiol. 2021;94:20210389. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210389.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shah A, Nassri M, Kay J, et al. Intraoperative radiation exposure in hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. HIP Int. 2020;30(3):267–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700019887362.
Hirata T, Inoue K, Shigemori S, et al. Estimation of exposure dose on MDCT examination: The measurement of organ dose and effective dose by anthropomorphic phantom. Japanese J Radiological Technol. 2010;66(8):901–10. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.66.901. [Article in Japanese].
Komiya I, Shirasaka T, Umezu Y, et al. Patient dose measurement with fluorescent glass dosimeter: Characteristics evaluation and patient skin dose measurement in abdominal interventional radiology. Japanese J Radiological Technol. 2004;60(2):270–7. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.KJ00000922295. [Article in Japanese].
International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1993). Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 2 ingestion dose coefficients (ICRP Publication 67). Annals of the ICRP, 23(3–4).
Hirofuji Y, Aoyama T, Koyama S, et al. Evaluation of patient doses from upper gastrointestinal tract examinations based on the dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom. J Japan Health Phys Soc. 2005;40(4):341–53. https://doi.org/10.5453/jhps.40.341. [Article in Japanese].
Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM. X-ray mass attenuation coefficients (NIST Standard Reference Database 126) [Table 4]. National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2004. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D01F.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging (ICRP Publication 135). Ann ICRP. 2017;46(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317717209.
International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2–43: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures (IEC 60601-2-43). International Electrotechnical Commission; 2010.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack (ICRP publication 96). Ann ICRP. 2005;35(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2005.01.002.
Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, Sulieman A, et al. Cumulative radiation exposure, effective and organ dose estimation from multiple head CT scans in stroke patients. Radiat Phys Chem. 2022;199:110306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110306.
Vano E. Challenges for managing the cumulative effective dose for patients. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20200814. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200814.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
National Cancer Center. (n.d.). Cancer risk after the East Japan earthquake [PDF]. [Article in Japanese]. https://www.ncc.go.jp/jp/other/shinsai/higashinihon/cancer_risk.pdf.
Rehani MM, Kathait A, Remedios D. Cumulative dose: A simple infographic for referrers and patients. Eur J Radiol. 2025;189:112202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112202.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation and your patient: A guide for medical practitioners (ICRP Supporting Guidance 2). Ann ICRP. 2001;31(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6453(02)00007-6.
Shrimpton PC, Jansen JTM, Harrison JD, et al. Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150346. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150346.
Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251:175–84. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081296.
Mayo-Smith WW, Hara AK, Mahesh M, et al. How I do it: Managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology. 2014;273(3):657–72. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132328.
Budd B, Patchava A, Khanduja V. Establishing the radiation risk from fluoroscopic-assisted arthroscopy of the hip. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1803–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1557-y.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wall BF, Haylock R, Jansen JTM, et al. Radiation risks from medical X-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient. HPA Report HPA-CRCE-028. Health Protection Agency; 2011.
Pise K, Tivaskar S, Luharia A, et al. Assessment of radiation dose in digital radiography system – A review article. J Pharm Negat Results. 2022;13(8):69–75. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S08.13.
Martin CJ, Harrison JD, Rehani MM, et al. Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: Past, present, and future. Physica Med. 2020;79:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.020.
Kai M. A review of the latest ICRP recommendations on effective dose: Commentary of ICRP publication 147. [Article in Japanese]. Japanese J Health Phys. 2021;56(3):133–44. https://doi.org/10.5453/jhps.56.133.
Yamauchi H. Medical exposure management solution – Radimetrics. [Article in Japanese]. Med Imaging Technol. 2018;36(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.11409/mit.36.26.
Nazari AH, Karim A, Rahmat MK, S. M. S. S., et al. Dosimetry output of CT-Expo and WAZA-ARI in different acquisition parameters of CT abdomen-Pelvis Examination: A comparative study. Phys Technol Med. 2021;2(1–2):42–50.
Comments (0)