Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in preparing root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30(8):559–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000129039.59003.9d.
Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14(7):346–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(88)80196-1.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, et al. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000;26(3):161–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1031–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.008.
Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, et al. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel–titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009;35(11):1469–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.015.
Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercadé Bellido M, et al. Influence of temperature on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal rotary files. J Endod. 2017;43(2):200–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.014.
Hieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, et al. Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments. J Endod. 2015;41(7):1134–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.030.
Karataş E, Arslan H, Büker M, et al. Effect of movement kinematics on the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J. 2016;49(4):361–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12453.
Chen C. Citespace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J the Am Soc Inform Sci Techn. 2006;57(3):359–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317.
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, et al. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, et al. Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011;62(7):1382–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.
Kaşıkçı S, Sirinoğlu E. Publication trends in fracture resistance research of endodontically treated teeth: a bibliometric analysis of the last 5 years. J Inter Dent Sci. 2024;10(2):72–7.
Deng Y, Zhang J, Wang X, et al. A bibliometric analysis of root canal irrigation: from laboratory to clinical practice. Aust Endod J. 2025;51(1):197–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12909.
Guerrero-Gironés J, Forner L, Sanz JL, et al. Scientific production on silicate-based endodontic materials: evolution and current state: a bibliometric analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(9):5611–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04605-8.
Aksoy U, Küçük M, Versiani MA, et al. Publication trends in micro-CT endodontic research: a bibliometric analysis over a 25-year period. Int Endod J. 2021;54(3):343–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13433.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moral-Muñoz JA, Herrera-Viedma E, Santisteban-Espejo A, et al. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. Profesional de la Información. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03.
Singh VK, Singh P, Karmakar M, et al. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2021;126:5113–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
de Araújo LP, da Rosa WLO, Gobbo LB, et al. Global research trends on photodynamic therapy in endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2022;40: 103039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103039.
Saraç Atagün Ö, Çardakcı Bahar Ş, Ceylan Şen S, et al. Research trends and mapping knowledge for maxillary sinus augmentation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;126(4): 102116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102116.
Usta SN, Uğur-Aydın Z, Demirkaya K, et al. Contemporary research trends on nanoparticles in endodontics: a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles. Restor Dent Endod. 2023;48(3): e27. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e27.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lima TO, Rocha AdO, dos Anjos LM, et al. A global overview of guided endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. J Endod. 2024;50(1):10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.002
Usta SN, Betancourt P, Ceylan A, et al. The cutting-edge roles of lasers in endodontics: a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles. Lasers Med Sci. 2024;39(1):219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04163-3.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Heimerl F, Lohmann S, Lange S, et al. Word cloud explorer: Text analytics based on word clouds. In: 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences: IEEE 2014:1833–1842.
Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1973;24(4):265–9.
Comments (0)