Overall fit of anterior and posterior single crown substructures fabricated with different additive manufacturing and conventional techniques

Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Zavanelli RA, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Coelho PG. Reliability of metalloceramic and zirconia-based ceramic crowns. J Dent Res. 2010;89(10):1051–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510375826.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Giordano RA. Dental ceramic restorative systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17(8):779–94.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang RR, Fenton A. Titanium for prosthodontic applications: a review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 1996;27(6):401–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jang SH, Lee DH, Ha JY, Hanawa T, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Preliminary evaluation of mechanical properties of Co-Cr alloys fabricated by three new manufacturing processes. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(4):396–8. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4298.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan PL, Gratton DG, Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(5):378–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00302.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2015;219(11):521–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kızılırmak KT, Yılmaz BK, Orhan K, Tamam E. Effect of manufacturing type and aging on the fit of metal frameworks: an in vitro micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(5):271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06345-x.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Presotto AGC, Barão VAR, Bhering CLB, Mesquita MF. Dimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(1):38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.019.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang J, Li H, Xu L, Wang Y. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(5):897–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.011.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years’ experience in general practice. Br Dent J. 1972;132(1):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802795.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Örtorp A, Jönsson D, Mouhsen A, von Vult Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):356–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carbajal Mejía JB, Yatani H, Wakabayashi K, Nakamura T. Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated over reverse tapered preparations. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):477–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12715.

Article  Google Scholar 

Özsürmeli H, Türker ŞB. In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal accuracy of different types of dental ceramic restorations fabricated based on digital and conventional impressions. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34(1):61–9. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6443.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pedroche LO, Bernardes SR, Leão MP, Kintopp CC, Correr GM, Ornaghi BP, Gonzaga CC. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0113.

Article  Google Scholar 

Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: North American ed. SAGE; 2018.

Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(1):52–4. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nakamura T, Nonaka M, Maruyama T. In vitro fitting accuracy of copy-milled alumina cores and all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(3):189–93.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(7):526–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01458.x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhang X. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(6):623–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.10.012.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

James AE, Umamaheswari B, Shanthana Lakshmi CB. Comparative evaluation of marginal accuracy of metal copings fabricated using direct metal laser sintering, computer-aided milling, ringless casting, and traditional casting techniques: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(3):421–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_191_18.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kocaağaoğlu H, Kılınç Hİ, Albayrak H, Kara M. In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):368–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sundar MK, Chikmagalur SB, Pasha F. Marginal fit and microleakage of cast and metal laser sintered copings–an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(4):252–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gaikwad BS, Nazirkar G, Dable R, Singh S. Comparative evaluation of marginal fit and axial wall adaptability of copings fabricated by metal laser sintering and lost-wax technique: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018;18(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_271_17.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Traini T, Mangano C, Sammons RL, Mangano F, Macchi A, Piattelli A. Direct laser metal sintering as a new approach to fabrication of an isoelastic functionally graded material for manufacture of porous titanium dental implants. Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1525–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.029.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu D, Xiang N, Wei B. The marginal fit of selective laser melting-fabricated metal crowns: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(6):1437–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.018.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bayramoğlu E, Özkan YK, Yildiz C. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(1):52–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.002.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Usta Kutlu İ, Hayran Y. Influence of various fabrication techniques and porcelain firing on the accuracy of metal-ceramic crowns. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):845. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04634-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nesse H, Ulstein DM, Vaage MM, Øilo M. Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(5):686–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.007.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif