Idiopathic scrotal hematoma is a rare but recognized condition in the neonatal population. We performed a review of the literature on this topic and found a total of 16 cases of idiopathic scrotal hematoma in neonatal age, including our case report. Clinical, radiologic, and operative information is summarized in Table 1.

First described in 1989 by Davenport et al. [2], idiopathic scrotal hematoma was identified as a potential cause of neonatal acute scrotum and consequently as a differential diagnosis for testicular torsion. The authors suggested that an excessively high venous pressure in the scrotal veins during a difficult delivery (e.g., forceps delivery or large-for-gestational-age – LGA – newborns) could be the cause of this condition. However, in our literature review, only 3/16 patients (19%) were LGA and only 8/16 (50%) had a difficult delivery. In our case report, the initial clinical presentation strongly suggested testicular torsion, although Doppler testicular US did not confirm the diagnosis. Upon re-examination after the US, the clinical findings had changed significantly: the testicle was much softer, and persistent congestion was primarily observed in the tunica vaginalis. This could indicate intermittent testicular torsion, a condition in which symptoms spontaneously resolve, and blood flow is restored to a previously avascular testicle, as seen during US evaluation. In our opinion, the scrotal hematoma observed the following day in our patient may have been a consequence of this intermittent torsion, which likely led to severe congestion and rupture of the fragile scrotal veins, particularly vulnerable at this age.

While Davenport et al. [2] emphasized the need for surgical exploration to differentiate idiopathic scrotal hematoma from testicular torsion and to drain the hematoma, Yeh et al. [3] raised the question of whether surgery was always necessary, especially in neonatal patients with well-known anesthesia-associated risks. Acknowledging that distinguishing idiopathic scrotal hematoma from testicular torsion can be challenging, they proposed that, unlike testicular torsion, idiopathic scrotal hematoma typically does not present with discoloration in the groin, and the spermatic cord appears normal on palpation. Additionally, they suggested that imaging techniques such as radioisotope testicular scanning and Doppler US could evaluate testicular perfusion, aiding in the differentiation between idiopathic scrotal hematoma and testicular torsion.

In recent decades, significant advancements in US techniques have made it increasingly possible to avoid surgery, with diagnostic accuracy now reaching up to 92%. In addition to the absence of blood flow, indicators of testicular torsion include heterogeneity in echogenicity, thickening of the tunica albuginea, irregular margins, and the presence of hydrocele [4]. Our literature review shows that all patients reported over the past 25 years, including our case, underwent testicular Doppler US, but only three (33%) cases of torsion could not be excluded, requiring exploratory surgery. Some researchers [5, 6] also recommend abdominal US to rule out intra-abdominal causes of acute scrotum, such as intra-abdominal bleeding (particularly adrenal hemorrhage) or perforation (e.g., meconium peritonitis). In our review, abdominal US was performed in 15 out of 16 cases (94%) and was negative in all of them.

Based on a testicular doppler US negative for testicular torsion and an abdominal US negative for intra-abdominal causes of acute scrotum, a diagnosis of idiopathic scrotal hematoma can be made by exclusion. Recent studies in the literature consistently support that in such cases surgery can be avoided and a conservative approach can be safely adopted [1, 6,7,8]. Exceptions include compressive hematomas that compromise testicular vascularization [5] and those that become infected [7]. In all cases of conservatively treated cases of idiopathic scrotal hematoma reported in the literature, follow-up examinations have shown normal testicular development.

In conclusion, idiopathic scrotal hematoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute scrotum in the neonatal period. Doppler testicular US and abdominal US are usually sufficient to distinguish idiopathic scrotal hematoma from other potential causes, particularly testicular torsion, thereby preventing unnecessary surgical exploration.