Schofield KA. Anatomy in occupational therapy program curriculum: practitioners’ perspectives. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;7:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1378.

Article  Google Scholar 

Giles A, Conrad W, Lundsford D, Valdes K et al. Exploring anatomy background, perceived anatomy preparedness, and academic performance among OT graduate students: a survey study. Am J Occup Ther. 2021;75:7512505084–7512505084p7512505081. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2021.75S2-PO84

Article  Google Scholar 

Schofield KA. Anatomy education in occupational therapy curricula: perspectives of practitioners in the United States. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;3:243–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1723.

Article  Google Scholar 

Veazey K, Robertson EM. How human anatomy is being taught in entry-level occupational therapy programs in the United States. Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(2):305–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2226.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wan Yunus F, Ahmad Ridhuwan NF, Romli MH, et al. The perception of allied health professionals on occupational therapy. Occup Ther Int. 2022;2588902. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2588902

Ho ES, Dove E, Aitkens L, Duncan A, Agur AMR, et al. Anatomy learning outcomes in occupational therapy: impact of prior coursework. Can J of Occup Ther. 2024;84174241297588. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174241297588

Lysaght R, Donnelly C, Villeneuve M, et al. Factors predicting applicant outcomes in occupational therapy education. Can J of Occup Ther. 2009;76(1):38–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740907600110.

Article  Google Scholar 

d’Arnaud L, Husmann PR. Prior anatomy experience among medical students: what difference does it make? Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(2):348–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2238.

Article  Google Scholar 

Louro MD, Meegan G, Rudin LR, Granatosky MC, Thompson NE et al. Students with prior anatomy experience start out stronger in medical school gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(7):1406–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2495.

Article  Google Scholar 

Robertson EM, Thompson KL, Notebaert AJ et al. Perceived benefits of anatomy coursework prior to medical and dental school. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(2):168–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1882.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dove E, Hennessy K, Kirou-Mauro A, Aitkens L, Duncan A, Agur A, Ho ES, et al. Gross and applied anatomy pedagogical approaches in occupational therapy education: a scoping review. Can J of Occup Ther. 2024;91(2):136–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174231197614.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang H, Liao AWX, Goh SH, Wu XV, Yoong SQ, et al. Effectiveness of peer teaching in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing Educ Today. 2022;118: 105499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105499.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dunkin E, Hook P. An investigation into the efficiency of peer teaching. Assess Eval High Educ. 1978;4(1):22–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293780040102.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kinirons SA, Reddin VM, Maguffin J, et al. Effects of alternating dissection with peer teaching and faculty prosected cadaver demonstrations in a physical therapy and occupational therapy gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(5):468–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1833

Article  Google Scholar 

Manyama M, Stafford R, Mazyala E, Lukanima A, Magele N, Kidenya BR, Kauki J, et al. Improving gross anatomy learning using reciprocal peer teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:95 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0617-1

Green RA, Farchione D, Hughes DL, Chan SP, et al. Participation in asynchronous online discussion forums does improve student learning of gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(1):71–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1376.

Article  Google Scholar 

Green RA, Hughes DL. Student outcomes associated with use of asynchronous online discussion forums in gross anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(2):101–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1310.

Article  Google Scholar 

Anderson LW, Krathwhl DR. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.

Google Scholar 

Liu S, Kang L, Liu Z, Zhao L, Yang Z, Su Z, et al. Exploring the relationships between students’ network characteristics, discussion topics and learning outcomes in a course discussion forum. J Comput High Educ. 2023;35:487–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09335-0.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ouyang F, Chang Y. The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions. Brit J Educ Technol. 2019;50(3):1396–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12647

Article  Google Scholar 

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

Article  Google Scholar 

IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 29.0.2.0. 2023. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6607043. Accessed May 2, 2025.

Willoughby BR, Flack NAMS, Bird RJ, Woodley SJ. Motivation to learn in university science students studying anatomy: a mixed-methods analysis of what drives learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(4):818–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2416.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):591–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701606799.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pedaste M, Mäeots M, Siiman LA, de Jong T, van Riesen SAN, Kamp ET, Manoli CC, Zacharias C, Zacharia ZC, Tsourlidaki E, et al. Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educ Res Rev. 2015;14:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alfieri L, Brooks PJ, Aldrich NJ, Tenenbaum HR, et al. Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? J Educ Psychol. 2011;103(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00217.

Article  Google Scholar 

Öztürk B, Kaya M, Demir M, et al. Does inquiry-based learning model improve learning outcomes? A second-order meta-analysis. J Pedagog Res. 2022;6(4):201–216. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202217481

Article  Google Scholar 

Andrini VS. The effectiveness of inquiry learning method to enhance students’ learning outcome: a theoretical and empirical review. J Educ Pract. 2016;7(3):38–42.

Google Scholar