Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Clinical Outcomes in De Novo Coronary Lesions After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Finn AV, Virmani R. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1314–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.011.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hassan AK, Bergheanu SC, Stijnen T, van der Hoeven BL, Snoep JD, Plevier JW, Schalij MJ, Wouter JJ. Late stent malapposition risk is higher after drug-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent implantation and associates with late stent thrombosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1172–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn553.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, Ge J, Poerner TC, Shin ES, Alfonso F, Latib A, Ong PJ, Rissanen TT, et al. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, Banning AP, Budaj A, Buechel RR, Chiariello GA, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3415–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ma Z, Liu K, Hu Y, Hu X, Wang B, Li Z. Comparison between drug-coated balloon and stents in large de novo coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07548-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang W, Zhang M, Tian J, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Song X. Drug-coated balloon-only strategy for de novo coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2023;2023: 3121601. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3121601.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cortese B, Serruys PW. Single-antiplatelet treatment after coronary angioplasty with drug-coated balloon. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12: e028413. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.122.028413.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

El Khoury A, Lazar L, Cortese B. The fate of coronary dissections left after sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty: a prespecified subanalysis of the EASTBOURNE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;102:979–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30906.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tanaka A, Latib A, Jabbour RJ, Kawamoto H, Giannini F, Ancona M, Regazzoli D, Mangieri A, Mattioli R, Chieffo A, et al. Impact of angiographic result after predilatation on outcome after drug-coated balloon treatment of in-stent coronary restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:1460–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song L, Xu B, Tu S, Guan C, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, et al. 2-year outcomes of angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:2089–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biscaglia S, Verardi FM, Tebaldi M, Guiducci V, Caglioni S, Campana R, Scala A, Marrone A, Pompei G, Marchini F, et al. QFR-based virtual PCI or conventional angiography to guide PCI: the AQVA trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:783–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.054.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tang J, Hou H, Chu J, Chen F, Yao Y, Gao Y, Ye Z, Zhuang S, Lai Y, Liu X. Clinical implication of quantitative flow ratio to predict clinical events after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. Clin Cardiol. 2021;44:978–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23630.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu XQ, Li LB, You W, Wu ZM, Zhao L, Wang ZH, Meng PN, Liu B, Ye F. Clinical value of the quantitative flow ratio to predict long-term target vessel failure in patients with in-stent restenosis after drug-coated balloon angioplasty. Curr Med Sci. 2024;44:561–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2876-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meng PN, Liu B, Li LB, Yin DL, Zhang H, Pan DF, You W, Wu ZM, Wu XQ, Zhao L, et al. Cut-off values of lesion and vessel quantitative flow ratio in de novo coronary lesion post-drug-coated balloon therapy predicting vessel restenosis at mid-term follow-up. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134:1450–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001577.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kleber FX, Rittger H, Bonaventura K, Zeymer U, Wöhrle J, Jeger R, Levenson B, Möbius-Winkler S, Bruch L, Fischer D, et al. Drug-coated balloons for treatment of coronary artery disease: updated recommendations from a consensus group. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102:785–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-013-0609-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li L, Guan C, Meng S, Bai Y, Zhang Z, Zou K, Ruan Y, Cao X, Jia R, Guo C, et al. Short- and long-term functional results following drug-coated balloons versus drug- eluting stents in small coronary vessels: the RESTORE quantitative flow ratio study. Int J Cardiol. 2021;327:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.035.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tu S, Ding D, Chang Y, Li C, Wijns W, Xu B. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: a novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97(Suppl 2):1040–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29592.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, Regar E, van Geuns RJ, de Jaegere PJ, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:636–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.024.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Baumbach A, Engstrøm T, Klauss V, MacCarthy PA, Manoharan G, Oldroyd KG, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1853–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00057-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:3077–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dai N, Hwang D, Lee JM, Zhang J, Jeon KH, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, Koo BK, Ge J. Feasibility of quantitative flow ratio-derived pullback pressure gradient index and its impact on diagnostic performance. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:353–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.036.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dai N, Yuan S, Dou K, Zhang R, Hu N, He J, Guan C, Zou T, Qiao Z, Duan S, et al. Prognostic implications of prestent pullback pressure gradient and poststent quantitative flow ratio in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11: e024903. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.121.024903.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dai N, Zhang B, Gong Z, Dong Z, Tang X, Yu H, Gu T, Duan S, Qian J, Shi H, et al. Quantitative flow ratio derived pullback pressure gradient and CZT-SPECT measured longitudinal flow gradient for hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023;30:1992–2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03245-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398:2149–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02248-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biscaglia S, Tebaldi M, Brugaletta S, Cerrato E, Erriquez A, Passarini G, Ielasi A, Spitaleri G, Di Girolamo D, Mezzapelle G, et al. Prognostic value of QFR measured immediately after successful stent implantation: the international multicenter prospective HAWKEYE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:2079–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kogame N, Takahashi K, Tomaniak M, Chichareon P, Modolo R, Chang CC, Komiyama H, Katagiri Y, Asano T, Stables R, et al. Clinical implication of quantitative flow ratio after percutaneous coronary intervention for 3-vessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:2064–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu L, Ding F, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Zhu J, Zhu Z, Du R, Yang Z, Hu J, Tu S, Zhang R. Prognostic value of post-procedural μQFR for drug-coated balloons in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Cardiol J. 2023;30:167–77. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0154.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Comments (0)

No login
gif