OECD (2015) Test Guideline No. 404: Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion. Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264242678-en

Hayes B, Patrick E, Maibach H (2008) Dermatotoxicology. In: Hayes AW (ed) Principles and methods of toxicology, 5th edn. CRC Press, London, pp 1359–1405 (2014 6th edn).  https://doi.org/10.1201/b17359-31

Raabe HA, Costin GE, Allen DG, Lowit A, Corvaro M, O’Dell L, Breeden-Alemi J, Page K, Perron M, Silva TF, Westerink W, Baker E, Sullivan K (2025) Human relevance of in vivo and in vitro skin irritation tests for hazard classification of pesticides. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 44:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2024.2387596

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basketter D, Jirova D, Kandarova H (2012) Review of skin irritation/corrosion hazards on the basis of human data: a regulatory perspective. Interdiscip Toxicol 5:98–104. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-012-0017-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rooney JP, Choksi NY, Ceger P, Daniel AB, Truax J, Allen D, Kleinstreuer N (2021) Analysis of variability in the rabbit skin irritation assay. Regul Toxicol Pharm 122:104920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104920

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Woodruff TJ, Rayasam SDG, Axelrad DA, Koman PD, Chartres N, Bennett DH, Birnbaum LS, Brown P, Carignan CC, Cooper C, Cranor CF, Diamond ML, Franjevic S, Gartner EC, Hattis D, Hauser R, Heiger-Bernays W, Joglekar R, Lam J, Levy JI, MacRoy PM, Maffini MV, Marquez EC, Morello-Frosch R, Nachman KE, Nielsen GH, Oksas C, Abrahamsson DP, Patisaul HB, Patton S, Robinson JF, Rodgers KM, Rossi MS, Rudel RA, Sass JB, Sathyanarayana S, Schettler T, Shaffer RM, Shamasunder B, Shepard PM, Shrader-Frechette K, Solomon GM, Subra WA, Vandenberg LN, Varshavsky JR, White RF, Zarker K, Zeise L (2023) A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement. Environ Health-Glob 21:132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00930-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Draize JHWG, Calvery HO (1944) Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and the mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 82:377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)08751-8

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Singh M, Bharadwaj S, Lee KE, Kang SG (2020) Therapeutic nanoemulsions in ophthalmic drug administration: concept in formulations and characterization techniques for ocular drug delivery. J Control Release 328:895–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.025

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

UNECE (2023) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), 10th edn. UNECE, Geneva. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/ghs-rev10-2023

Google Scholar 

Poh WT, Stanslas J (2024) The new paradigm in animal testing - “3Rs alternatives.” Regul Toxicol Pharm 153:105705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105705

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

EU (2013) European Commission, Full EU ban on animal testing for cosmetics enters into force. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_13_210

Macmillan DS, Bergqvist A, Burgess-Allen E, Callan I, Dawick J, Carrick B, Ellis G, Ferro R, Goyak K, Smulders C, Stackhouse RA, Troyano E, Westmoreland C, Ramón BS, Rocha V, Zhang XL (2024) The last resort requirement under REACH: From principle to practice. Regul Toxicol Pharm 147:105557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105557

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mini CA, Ballestero G, Munari CC, Carrao DB, Fonseca BC, Albuquerque NC, Marquele-Oliveira F (2024) Reliability and relevance of the ES®-RHE model for in vitro skin irritation test application. Toxicol in Vitro 101:105932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2024.105932

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robinson NB, Krieger K, Khan FM, Huffman W, Chang M, Naik A, Yongle R, Hameed I, Krieger K, Girardi LN, Gaudino M (2019) The current state of animal models in research: a review. Int J Surg 72:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmidt FF, Nowakowski S, Kluger PJ (2020) Improvement of a three-layered skin model for topical application of irritating substances. Front Bioeng Biotech 8:388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00388

Article  Google Scholar 

Catarino CM, Pedrosa TD, Pennacchi PC, de Assis SR, Gimenes F, Consolaro MEL, Barros SBD, Maria-Engler SS (2018) Skin corrosion test: a comparison between reconstructed human epidermis and full thickness skin models. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 125:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.01.002

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uhm C, Jeong H, Lee SH, Hwang JS, Lim KM, Nam KT (2023) Comparison of structural characteristics and molecular markers of rabbit skin, pig skin, and reconstructed human epidermis for an ex vivo human skin model. Toxicol Res 39:477–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-023-00185-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

OECD (2025) Test Guideline No. 431 in vitro skin corrosion: reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) test method, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264264618-en

Alépée N, Grandidier MH, Cotovio J (2014) Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431. Toxicol In Vitro 28:131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2013.10.016

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kandárová H, Liebsch M, Spielmann H, Genschow E, Schmidt E, Traue D, Guest R, Whittingham A, Warren N, Gamer AO, Remmele M, Kaufmann T, Wittmer E, De Wever B, Rosdy M (2006) Assessment of the human epidermis model SkinEthic RHE for in vitro skin corrosion testing of chemicals according to new OECD TG 431. Toxicol In Vitro 20:547–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2005.11.008

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Katoh M, Hamajima F, Ogasawara T, Hata K (2010) Assessment of the human epidermal model LabCyte EPI-MODEL for skin corrosion testing according to the OECD test guideline 431. J Toxicol Sci 35:411–417. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.35.411

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Frankart A, Malaisse J, De Vuyst E, Minner F, de Rouvroit CL, Poumay Y (2012) Epidermal morphogenesis during progressive 3D reconstruction at the air-liquid interface. Exp Dermatol 21:871–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12020

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Han J, Kim S, Lee SH, Kim JS, Chang YJ, Jeong TC, Kang MJ, Kim TS, Yoon HS, Lee GY, Bae S, Lim KM (2020) Me-too validation study for in vitro skin irritation test with a reconstructed human epidermis model, KeraSkin for OECD test guideline 439. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 117:104725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104725

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jung KM, Lee SH, Jang WH, Jung HS, Heo Y, Park YH, Bae S, Lim KM, Seok SH (2014) KeraSkin™-VM: a novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests. Toxicol In Vitro 28:742–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.02.014

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hwang JH, Lee S, Lee HG, Choi D, Lim KM (2022) Evaluation of skin irritation of acids commonly used in cleaners in 3D-reconstructed human epidermis model, KeraSkin(TM). Toxics. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100558

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hwang JH, Jeong H, Jung YO, Nam KT, Lim KM (2021) Skin irritation and inhalation toxicity of biocides evaluated with reconstructed human epidermis and airway models. Food Chem Toxicol 150:112064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112064

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

OECD (2015) Performance standards for the assessment of proposed similar or modified in vitro reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) test methods for skin corrosion testing as described in TG 431, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 219. Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/b7c3d922-en

Filaire E, Nachat-Kappes R, Laporte C, Harmand MF, Simon M, Poinsot C (2022) Alternative in vitro models used in the main safety tests of cosmetic products and new challenges. Int J Cosmet Sci 44:604–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12803

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ICCVAM (2004) Recommended Performance Standards for In Vitro Test Methods for Skin Corrosion. NIH (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences). https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/sites/default/files/iccvam/docs/dermal_docs/ps/ps044510.pdf

Kandarova H, Liebsch M, Schmidt E, Genschow E, Traue D, Spielmann H, Meyer K, Steinhoff C, Tornier C, De Wever B, Rosdy M (2006) Assessment of the skin irritation potential of chemicals by using the SkinEthic reconstructed human epidermal model and the common skin irritation protocol evaluated in the ECVAM skin irritation validation study. Altern Lab Anim 34:393–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290603400407

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fentem JH, Archer GE, Balls M, Botham PA, Curren RD, Earl LK, Esdaile DJ, Holzhutter HG, Liebsch M (1998) The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 2. Results and evaluation by the management team. Toxicol In Vitro 12:483–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-2333(98)00019-8

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barratt MD (1995) Quantitative structure activity relationships for skin corrosivity of organic acids, bases and phenols. Toxicol Lett 75:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(94)03177-9

Article  CAS