Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danpanichkul P, Suparan K, Tothanarungroj P, et al. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021. Gut. 2025;74:26–34.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pak H, Maghsoudi LH, Soltanian A, Gholami F. Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients. Ann Med Surg. 2020;55:13–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang S, Xu L, Wang Q, et al. Postoperative complications and prognosis after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

van Kooten RT, Bahadoer RR, Peeters K, et al. Preoperative risk factors for major postoperative complications after complex gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:3049–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.021.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steffens D, Beckenkamp PR, Young J, Solomon M, da Silva TM, Hancock MJ. Is preoperative physical activity level of patients undergoing cancer surgery associated with postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:510–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McBride KE, Solomon MJ, Bannon PG, Glozier N, Steffens D. Surgical outcomes for people with serious mental illness are poorer than for other patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Australia. 2021;214:379–85.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hogan S, Steffens D, Vuong K, Rangan A, Solomon M, Carey S. Preoperative nutritional status impacts clinical outcome and hospital length of stay in pelvic exenteration patients: a retrospective study. Nutrition Health. 2022;28:41–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steffens D, Ismail H, Denehy L, et al. Preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test associated with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:7120–46.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fleurent-Grégoire C, Burgess N, McIsaac DI, et al. Towards a common definition of surgical prehabilitation: a scoping review of randomised trials. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133:305–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.035.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Minnella EM, Awasthi R, Loiselle S-E, Agnihotram RV, Ferri LE, Carli F. Effect of exercise and nutrition prehabilitation on functional capacity in esophagogastric cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:1081–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Molenaar CJL, Minnella EM, Coca-Martinez M, et al. Effect of multimodal prehabilitation on reducing postoperative complications and enhancing functional capacity following colorectal cancer surgery: the PREHAB randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2023;158:572–81.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bausys A, Luksta M, Anglickiene G, et al. Effect of home-based prehabilitation on postoperative complications after surgery for gastric cancer: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2023;110:1800–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li M, Bolshinsky V, Ismail H, et al. A cross-sectional survey of Australian anesthetists’ and surgeons’ perceptions of preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66:388–405.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Theissen A, Petriccione R, Evans I, Slim K. Practices of prehabilitation prior to major surgery–A francophone survey. Surg Open Dig Adv. 2022;5:100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soda.2021.100038.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferguson MT, Fernando JR, McManus S, et al. Perioperative medicine in Australia and New Zealand: a cross-sectional survey. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2022;50:403–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steffens D, Venter S, Makker P, et al. Prehabilitation practices for patients undergoing cancer surgery—an international survey. World J Surg. 2026;50(1):204–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70180.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meirte J, Hellemans N, Anthonissen M, et al. Benefits and disadvantages of electronic patient-reported outcome measures: systematic review. JMIR Periop Med. 2020;3:e15588.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaltenmeier C, Shen C, Medich DS, et al. Time to surgery and colon cancer survival in the United States. Ann Surg. 2021;274:1025–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riedel B, Ismail H, Denehy L, Dubowitz J, Watters D. Transforming surgical waiting lists into preparation opportunities: leveraging multimodal prehabilitation to optimise surgical outcomes. ANZ J Surg. 2025;95:12–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19307.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petridis AP, Koh C, Solomon M, et al. An online preoperative screening tool to optimize care for patients undergoing cancer surgery: a mixed-method study protocol. Cancers. 2025;17:861.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1008–15.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017;31:684–706.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raichurkar P, Denehy L, Solomon M, et al. Research priorities in prehabilitation for patients undergoing cancer surgery: an international Delphi study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30:7226–35. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14192-x.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651–4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riedel B, Li MH, Lee CA, et al. A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the measurement of exercise tolerance before surgery (METS) study. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126:181–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rose M, Bjorner J, Becker J, Fries J, Ware J. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:17–33.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stratton RJ, Hackston A, Longmore D, et al. Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and inpatients: prevalence, concurrent validity and ease of use of the “Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool” (“MUST”) for adults. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:799–808.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferguson M, Capra S, Bauer J, Banks M. Development of a valid and reliable malnutrition screening tool for adult acute hospital patients. Nutrition. 1999;15:458–64.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abbott J, Teleni L, McKavanagh D, Watson J, McCarthy A, Isenring E. Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in chemotherapy outpatients. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:3883–7.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Löwe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ–4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50:613–21.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.