Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

Article  Google Scholar 

López-Campos F, Martín-Martín M, Fornell-Pérez R, García-Pérez JC, Die-Trill J, Fuentes-Mateos R, et al. Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: current controversies and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:4218–39. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i29.4218.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Santiago I, Rodrigues B, Barata M, Figueiredo N, Fernandez L, Galzerano A, et al. Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide. Insights Imaging. 2021;12:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01055-w.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kasi A, Abbasi S, Handa S, Al-Rajabi R, Saeed A, Baranda J, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12): e2030097. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30097.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bhoday J, Balyasnikova S, Wale A, Brown G. How should imaging direct/orient management of rectal cancer? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30:297–312. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606107.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Santiago I, Figueiredo N, Parés O, Matos C. MRI of rectal cancer-relevant anatomy and staging key points. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00890-7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Krdzalic J, Maas M, Gollub MJ, Beets-Tan RGH. Guidelines for MR imaging in rectal cancer: Europe versus United States. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44:3498–507. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02251-5. An important paper comparing American and European guidelines and protocols for rectal MRI, which improve imaging quality and reporting standardization.

Nerad E, Lambregts DM, Kersten EL, Maas M, Bakers FC, van den Bosch HC, et al. MRI for local staging of colon cancer: can MRI become the optimal staging modality for patients with colon cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:385–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000794.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Laghi A. CT colonography: an update on current and future indications. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10:785–94. https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2016.1143358.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mainenti PP, Stanzione A, Guarino S, Romeo V, Ugga L, Romano F, et al. Colorectal cancer: parametric evaluation of morphological, functional and molecular tomographic imaging. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:5233–56. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i35.5233.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

•• García-Figueiras R, Baleato-González S, Padhani AR, Luna-Alcalá A, Marhuenda A, Vilanova JC, et al. Advanced imaging techniques in evaluation of colorectal cancer. Radiographics. 2018;38:740–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170044. This paper represents the most detailed and up-to-date review of the role of advanced imaging techniques in colorectal tumours.

Hsieh J, Flohr T. Computed tomography recent history and future perspectives. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021;8: 052109. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.5.052109.

Article  Google Scholar 

Willemink MJ, Noël PB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2185–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Q, Eagleson R, Peters TM. Volume visualization: a technical overview with a focus on medical applications. J Digit Imaging. 2011;24:640–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9321-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Planz VB, Lubner MG, Pickhardt PJ. Volumetric analysis at abdominal CT: oncologic and non-oncologic applications. Br J Radiol. 2019;92:20180631. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180631.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dappa E, Higashigaito K, Fornaro J, Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H. Cinematic rendering - an alternative to volume rendering for 3D computed tomography imaging. Insights Imaging. 2016;7:849–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0518-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Spada C, Hassan C, Bellini D, Burling D, Cappello G, Carretero C, et al. Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:2967–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07413-4. A consensus that establish clinical scenarios for the use of alternative techniques to optical colonoscopy.

Yee J, Chang KJ, Dachman AH, Kim DH, McFarland EG, Pickhardt PJ, et al. The added value of the CT colonography reporting and data system. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:931–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.04.031.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bates DDB, Paroder V, Lall C, Lalwani N, Widmar M, Garcia-Aguilar J. Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right colon cancer: an introduction for abdominal radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44:3518–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02037-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nepal P, Mori S, Kita Y, Tanabe K, Baba K, Sasaki K, et al. Anatomical study of the inferior mesenteric vein using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography in laparoscopy-assisted surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer. Surg Today. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02292-8. Online ahead of print.

Park JY, Kim SH, Lee SM, Lee JS, Han JK. CT volumetric measurement of colorectal cancer helps predict tumor staging and prognosis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178522. eCollection 2017.

Lim MC, Tan CH, Cai J, Zheng J, Kow AW. CT volumetry of the liver: where does it stand in clinical practice? Clin Radiol. 2014;69:887–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.021.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zimmermann M, Kuhl CK, Engelke H, Bettermann G, Keil S. CT-based whole-body tumor volumetry versus RECIST 1.1: feasibility and implications for inter-reader variability. Eur J Radiol. 2021;135:109514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109514.

Rothe JH, Grieser C, Lehmkuhl L, Schnapauff D, Fernandez CP, Maurer MH, et al. Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography–comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1831–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.018.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Winter KS, Hofmann FO, Thierfelder KM, Holch JW, Hesse N, Baumann AB, et al. Towards volumetric thresholds in RECIST 1.1: therapeutic response assessment in hepatic metastases. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:4839–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5424-0. A study that demonstrates the possibility of using volumetric measurements instead of the classic value of the largest diameter of the lesions (RECIST) in the assessment of response of colorectal cancer. Volumetric measurements represent more accurately tumour burden.

Rowe SP, Chu LC, Fishman EK. Computed tomography cinematic rendering in the evaluation of colonic pathology: technique and clinical applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43:475–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000864.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Srinivasan S. Dual-energy CT in colorectal cancers: beyond the density measurements. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23:479–80. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2017.17287.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sun K, Han R, Han Y, Shi X, Hu J, Lu B. Accuracy of combined computed tomography colonography and dual energy iiodine map imaging for detecting colorectal masses using high-pitch dual-source CT. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22188-x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Al-Najami I, Mahmoud Sheta H, Baatrup G. Differentiation between malignant and benign rectal tumors by dual-energy computed tomography - a feasibility study. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S55–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1574404.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chuang-Bo Y, Tai-Ping H, Hai-Feng D, et al. Quantitative assessment of the degree of differentiation in colon cancer with dual-energy spectral CT. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:2591–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1176-6.41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gong HX, Zhang KB, Wu LM, et al. Dual energy spectral CT imaging for colorectal cancer grading: a preliminary study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0147756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147756.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu J, Lv Y, Wang N, et al. The value of single-source dual-energy CT imaging for discriminating microsatellite instability from microsatellite stability human colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:3782–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06144-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cao Y, Zhang G, Bao H, Zhang S, Zhang J, Zhao Z, et al. Development of a dual-energy spectral CT based nomogram for the preoperative discrimination of mutated and wild-type KRAS in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Imaging. 2021;69:205–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.08.023.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fan S, Li X, Zheng L, Hu D, Ren X, Ye Z. Correlations between the iodine concentrations from dual energy computed tomography and molecular markers Ki-67 and HIF-1α in rectal cancer: a preliminary study. Eur J Radiol. 2017;96:109–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.026.

Article  PubMed