Blackmore AE, Wong MTC, Tang CL. “Evolution of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: an evidence-based review,” (in eng). World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(17):4926–33. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4926.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Masubuchi S, Okuda J, Hamamoto H, Ishii M, Osumi W, Yamamoto M, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic left colectomy forleft-side colon cancer: a retrospective study. Clin Surg. 2019;4:2506.
Brown RF, Cleary RK. “Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive colectomy,” (in eng). J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;11(3):500–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2019.12.02.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cleary RK, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: a multi-center propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes,” (in eng). PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0206277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206277.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Van Leersum NJ, et al. “The Dutch surgical colorectal audit,” (in eng). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(10):1063–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008.
Vlug MS, et al. “Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study),” (in eng). Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):868–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce.
Kennedy RH, et al. “Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL,” (in eng). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(17):1804–11. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.3694.
Samia H, Lawrence J, Nobel T, Stein S, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP. Am J Surg. 2013;205(3):264–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.006 (discussion 268).
Jian-Cheng T, Shu-Sheng W, Bo Z, Jian F, Liang Z. “Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: an evaluation of short-term outcomes,” (in eng). Medicine. 2016;95(48):e5538–e5538. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005538.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
R. F. Brown and R. K. Cleary, "Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive colectomy," Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Vol 11, No 3 (June 2020): Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/35090.
"Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis," J Laparoendosc Ad Surg Tech 2020, 30 4 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0693
Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T, Wei M, Wang Z. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(4):348–57. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0485.
van Oostendorp S, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):64–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y.
Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(9):1177–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1651-7.
• Aiolfi A, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis,” (in eng). J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(4):402–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0693. (The most recent systematic review conducted at the time of writing this paper. Unlike previous reviews, it reported no significant differences in key outcomes such as anastomotic leakage. Lymph node yield was not analysed.)
Emile SH, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(11):1023–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02079-7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
"Wells G SB, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. (2013) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
Jadad AR, et al. “Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?,” (in eng). Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
T. C. C. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2014., 2014.
P. RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. “Meta-analysis in clinical trials,” (in eng). Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Akram WM, et al. “A propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted right colectomy in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway,” (in English). Am J Surg, Article. 2018;216(6):1095–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.010.
Anania G, et al. “A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery,” (in English). World J Gastroenterol, Article. 2012;18(29):3869–74. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i29.3869.
N. Bou Saleh et al., "Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: results from the CLIMHET study group," (in English). Tech Coloproctol 2020 24 6 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02202-z.
Carlini M, Spoletini D, Castaldi F, Giovannini C, Passaro U. “Laparoscopic resection of splenic flexure tumors,” (in English). Updates Surg, Article. 2016;68(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0357-0.
R. K. Cleary et al., "Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: a multi-center propensity scorematched comparison of outcomes," (in English), PLoS One 2018 13 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206277.
Fagarasan V, et al. “Which is the optimal method of reconstruction after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, the intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis technique?,” (in English), Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990). Article. 2020;115(4):493–504. https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.115.4.493.
M. E. Franklin Jr et al., "Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: 11-year experience," (in English). Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2004 69 Suppl 1 65–72. [Online]. Available: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L40414143&from=export.
Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B. “Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy,” (in English). Surg Endosc, Article. 2010;24(8):1886–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9.
Grieco M, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic resection of the splenic flexure colon cancer: a multicenter propensity score analysis,” (in English). Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, Article. 2019;29(6):483–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000653.
Hanna MH, et al. “Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis,” (in English). Surg Endosc, Article. 2016;30(9):3933–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4704-x.
M. Hellan, C. Anderson, and A. Pigazzi, "Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy," (in English). J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2009 Article vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 312–317. [Online]. Available: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L355484774&from=exporthttp://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/sls/10868089/v13n3/s6.pdf?expires=1255556505&id=52532148&titleid=75000538&accname=Elsevier+Science&checksum=C8AA576B818E1B929896AF4D710263AB.
T. Jian-Cheng, W. Shu-Sheng, Z. Bo, F. Jian, and Z. Liang, "Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: an evaluation of short-term outcomes." Medicine 2016 95 48 e5538. [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med13&AN=27902621http://bb2sz3ek3z.search.serialssolutions.com/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rfr_id=info:sid/Ovid:med13&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FMD.0000000000005538&rft_id=info:pmid/27902621&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=48&rft.spage=e5538&rft.pages=e5538&rft.date=2016&rft.jtitle=Medicine&rft.atitle=Total+laparoscopic+right+hemicolectomy+with+3-step+stapled+intracorporeal+isoperistaltic+ileocolic+anastomosis+for+colon+cancer%3A+An+evaluation+of+short-term+outcomes.&rft.aulast=Jian-Cheng.
Kayano H, et al. “Short- and long-term outcomes of 2-step stapled intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer,” (in English). Anticancer Res, Article. 2019;39(11):6393–401. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13853.
Comments (0)