Ginsberg DA, Boone TB, Cameron AP, et al. The AUA/SUFU guideline on adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: diagnosis and evaluation. J Urol. 2021;206(5):1097–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002235.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blok B, Castro-Diaz D, Del Popolo G, et al. EAU guidelines on Neuro-Urology. EAU guidelines. EAU guidelines Office; 2025.

Przydacz M, Goldman HB. Videourodynamics — role, benefits and optimal practice. Nat Rev Urol. 2025;22(3):130–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00923-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosen J, Johnson L, Joseph DB. Radiation exposure in pediatric videourodynamics: an evaluation of safety in comparison to voiding cystourethrogram. J Pediatr Urol. 2024;20(4):745.e1–745.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.06.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wyndaele M, Rosier PFWM. Basics of videourodynamics for adult patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(S6):S61–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23778.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen YC, Kuo HC. Risk factors of video urodynamics and bladder management for long-term complications in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2024;14:12632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63441-w.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rosier PFWM, Schaefer W, Lose G, et al. International continence society good urodynamic practices and terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;36(5):1243–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23124.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perrin A, Corcos J. The utility of urodynamic studies in neuro-urological patients. Biomedicines. 2023;11(4):1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041134.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Agrawal M, Joshi M. Urodynamic patterns after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(2):128–33. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000136.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Musco S, Padilla-Fernández B, Del Popolo G, et al. Value of urodynamic findings in predicting upper urinary tract damage in neuro-urological patients: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(5):1522–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23501.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sirasaporn P, Saengsuwan J. Incidence and predictive factors for developing vesicoureteric reflux in individuals with suprasarcral spinal cord injury: a historical cohort study. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:753–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00573-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu CQ, Franco I. Management of vesicoureteral reflux in neurogenic bladder. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58(Suppl 1):S54. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.S1.S54.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Al Taweel W, Seyam R. Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. RRU. 2015;7:85–99. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S29644.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang P, Yang Y, Wu Z, jin, Zhang N, Zhang C, Zhang hua. Should simultaneous ureteral reimplantation be performed during sigmoid bladder augmentation to reduce vesicoureteral reflux in neurogenic bladder cases? Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47:759–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0958-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simforoosh N, Tabibi A, Basiri A, Noorbala MH, Danesh AD, Ijadi A. Is ureteral reimplantation necessary during augmentation cystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder and vesicoureteral reflux? J Urol. 2002;168(4 Part 1):1439–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64469-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khoury AE, Dave S, Peralta-Del Valle MH, Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Bägli D. Severe bladder trabeculation obviates the need for bladder outlet procedures during augmentation cystoplasty in incontinent patients with neurogenic bladder. BJU Int. 2008;101(2):223–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07164.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wyndaele JJ, Wyndaele M, Rapidi CA, Krassioukov A. What do X-ray images of the bladder during video urodynamics show us in patients with spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord. 2022;60:408–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00771-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gan ZS, Logan J, Smith AL, et al. Evaluation of bladder dysfunction outcomes among standardized bladder shapes in children with spina bifida. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70131.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sakakibara R, Hattori T, Uchiyama T, Yamanishi T. Videourodynamic and sphincter motor unit potential analyses in parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(5):600–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.5.600.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Medel R, Ruarte AC, Herrera M, Roberto Castera, Podesta ML. Urinary continence outcome after augmentation ileocystoplasty as a single surgical procedure in patients with myelodysplasia. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Pt 2):1849–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000029549.55124.6d.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kreder KJ, Webster GD. Management of the bladder outlet in patients requiring enterocystoplasty. J Urol. 1992;147(1):38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37128-8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gosalbez R, Castellan M. Defining the role of the bladder-neck sling in the surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in children with neurogenic incontinence. World J Urol. 1998;16(4):285–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050068.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

D’Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, et al. The international continence society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):433–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23897.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marks BK, Goldman HB. Videourodynamics: indications and technique. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(3):383–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2014.04.008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Françot M, Lefevre C, Reiss B, et al. Indications and added value of videourodynamics in men with spinal cord injury. BJUI Compass. 2024;5(8):761–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.370.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Anding R, Rosier P, Smith P. When should video be added to conventional urodynamics in adults and is it justified by the evidence? ICI-RS 2014. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(2):324–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22865.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giarenis I, Phillips J, Mastoroudes H, et al. Radiation exposure during videourodynamics in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1547–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2062-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoffmann D, Sussman RD, Pape DM, et al. Radiation exposure during videourodynamic testing: is dose reduction possible using a standardized protocol? Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;39(2):715–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24258.

Article  Google Scholar 

de Wachter S, Abranches-Monteiro L, Gammie A, et al. Chapter 5: urodynamic testing. In: Cardozo, L, Rovner, E, Wagg, A, Wein, A, Abrams, P. (Eds) Incontinence 7th Edition (2023). ICI-ICS. International Continence Society, Bristol UK, ISBN: 978-0-9569607-4-0.

Geretto P, Ammirati E, Manassero A, et al. 57 - Urodynamic versus video-urodynamic evaluation in neurogenic bladder: which is the best diagnostic tool? Continence. 2024;10(Supplement):101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cont.2024.101284.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ansari SH, Mahdy AE. Are video-urodynamics superior to traditional urodynamic studies in changing treatment decision with urinary symptoms? Arab J Urol. 2019;17(2):160–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590518.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wöllner J, Pannek J. Urodynamic or video-urodynamic assessment in patients with spinal cord injury: this is not a question! Spinal Cord. 2015;53:S22–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.224.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar