Levins R. The strategy of model building in population biology. Am Sci. 1966;54:421–31.

Google Scholar 

Chalmers A. What is this thing called science? 4th ed. Hackett Publishing Company, University of Queensland Press; 2013. 304 p

Lepeltier T. Histoire et philosophie des sciences. Sciences Humaines. 2022.

Steele J. Preprint version—foundations of scientific research in the sport and exercise sciences. In: Dolan E, Steele J, editors. Research methods in sport and exercise science: an open access primer. society for transparency, openness, and replication in kinesiology; 2024. https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.366.

Bailer-Jones DM. Scientific models in philosophy of science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2009.

Google Scholar 

Page SE. The model thinker: what you need to know to make data work for you. London: Basic Books; 2018.

Google Scholar 

Hillis WD. Why physicists like models and why biologists should. Curr Biol. 1993;3:79–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-9822(93)90159-l.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hickson M. The necessity of philosophy in the exercise sciences. Philosophies. 2019;4:45. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4030045.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hicks JL, Uchida TK, Seth A, Rajagopal A, Delp SL. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement. J Biomech Eng. 2015;137: 020905. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029304.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lloyd DG, Jonkers I, Delp SL, Modenese L. The history and future of neuromusculoskeletal biomechanics. J Appl Biomech. 2023;39:273–83. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0165.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wakeling JM, Febrer-Nafría M, De Groote F. A review of the efforts to develop muscle and musculoskeletal models for biomechanics in the last 50 years. J Biomech. 2023;155: 111657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111657.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foster C. In quest of the unified field theory of exercise training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2014-0542.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McLean S, Robertson S, Salmon PM. Complexity and systems thinking in sport. J Sports Sci. 2024;43(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2388428.

Mitchell M, Newman M. Complex systems theory and evolution. Encycl Evol. 2002;1:1–5.

Google Scholar 

Drake J, Finke A, Ferguson R. All models are wrong, but some are more wrong than others. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05363-.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Drake J, Finke A, Ferguson R. Modelling human endurance: power laws vs critical power. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05274-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Briand J, Tremblay J, Thibault G. Can popular high-intensity interval training (HIIT) models lead to impossible training sessions? Sports (Basel). 2022;10:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports10010010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Robergs RA, Opeyemi O, Torrens S. How to be a better scientist: lessons from scientific philosophy, the historical development of science, and past errors within exercise physiology. Sports Med Health Sci. 2022;4:140–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2022.04.001.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Suchak T, Aliu AE, Harrison C, Zwiggelaar R, Geifman N, Spick M. Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database. PLoS Biol. 2025;23: e3003152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003152.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ditroilo M, Mesquida C, Abt G, Lakens D. Exploratory research in sport and exercise science: perceptions, challenges, and recommendations. J Sports Sci. 2025;43:1108–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2486871.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robinaugh DJ, Haslbeck JMB, Ryan O, Fried EI, Waldorp LJ. Invisible hands and fine calipers: a call to use formal theory as a toolkit for theory construction. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021;16:725–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620974697.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Williams AM, Ward P. Searching for the Holy Grail: can there ever be such a thing as a “Grand Unified Theory of sports performance”? Hum Mov Sci. 2017;56:181–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.012.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foster D, Anholm J, Best T, Boullosa D, Cresswell SL, Koning RH, et al. Scientific discovery and its role in sports science. Kinesiology. 2016;48:274–84.

Google Scholar 

Halperin I, Vigotsky AD, Foster C, Pyne DB. Strengthening the practice of exercise and sport-science research. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13:127–34.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bernards JR, Sato K, Haff GG, Bazyler CD. Current research and statistical practices in sport science and a need for change. Sports. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports5040087.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Perry JL, Nicholls AR, Clough PJ, Crust L. Assessing model fit: caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2015;19:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.952370.

Article  Google Scholar 

Morton RH. The critical power and related whole-body bioenergetic models. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96:339–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-005-0088-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pires FO. Lessons from a broad view of science: a response to Dr Robergs’ article. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4: e000353. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000353.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Robergs RA. Lessons from Popper for science, paradigm shifts, scientific revolutions and exercise physiology. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017;3: e000226. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000226.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schlick M, Rynin D. Positivism and realism. Synthese 1948;7(6-B):478–505.

Otoo BK. A reflective paper. J Educ Thought (JET). 2020;53:67–88.

Google Scholar 

Junjie M, Yingxin M. The discussions of positivism and interpretivism. Glob Acad J Humanit Soc Sci. 2022;4(1):10–14.

Pompeu FAMS. Why Pheidippides could not believe in the “Central Governor Model”: Popper’s philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories. Sports Med Health Sci. 2022;4:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2021.10.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pompeu FAMS. A little bit more about Popper’s philosophy. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4: e000401. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000401.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge; 2005.

Google Scholar 

Vickers B. Francis bacon and the progress of knowledge. J Hist Ideas. 1992;53:495.

Google Scholar 

Hill AV. The physiological basis of athletic records. Sci Mon. 1925;21:409–28.

Google Scholar 

Erren TC. The case for a posteriori hypotheses to fuel scientific progress. Med Hypotheses. 2007;69:448–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2007.01.013.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mangin T, Pageaux B. It is time to stop using the terminology "passive" fatigue. Motiv Sci. 2024;11(1):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000375.

Glazier PS. Towards a grand unified theory of sports performance. Hum Mov Sci. 2017;56:139–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oxford English Dictionary. Performance, N., Sense 1.e. Oxford University Press; 2023.

Pageaux B, Lepers R. The effects of mental fatigue on sport-related performance. Prog Brain Res. 2018;240:291–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.07.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K, Dahl H, Strömme SB. Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2003.

Google Scholar 

Thicke M. Evaluating formal models of science. Z Allg Wissenschaftstheor. 2020;51:315–35.

Google Scholar 

Roberts S, Pashler H. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychol Rev. 2000;107:358–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.358.

Article