Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A et al (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41:407–477

Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D et al (2021) 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 144:e368–e454

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV et al (2023) 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 148:e9–e119

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chao SP, Law WY, Kuo CJ et al (2010) The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1916–1923

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CAG, van Pelt N et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:636–643

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nous FMA, Geisler T, Kruk MBP et al (2022) Dynamic myocardial perfusion CT for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 15:75–87

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A et al (2014) Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7:267–277

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pontone G, Guaricci AI, Palmer SC et al (2020) Diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging for stable coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 300:276–281

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S et al (2022) CAD-RADS™ 2.0—2022 coronary artery disease-reporting and data system: an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 15:1974–2001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR et al (2015) Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 372:1291–1300

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

SCOT-HEART investigators (2015) CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet 385:2383–2391

Article  Google Scholar 

Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW et al (2006) Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2508–2514

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P et al (2008) Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 359:677–687

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rossi A, Wragg A, Klotz E et al (2016) Dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison of clinical analysis methods for the detection of vessel-specific ischemia. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 10:836–844

Google Scholar 

Danad I, Szymonifka J, Schulman-Marcus J, Min JK (2016) Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:836–844

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G et al (2020) CT perfusion versus coronary CT angiography in patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or CAD progression. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:732–742

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC et al (2007) Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 116:1290–1305

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stocker TJ, Deseive S, Leipsic J et al (2018) Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI). Eur Heart J 39:3715–3723

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Einstein AJ, Pascual TN, Mercuri M et al (2015) Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65-country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS). Eur Heart J 36:1689–1696

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Desiderio MC, Lundbye JB, Baker WL et al (2018) Current status of patient radiation exposure of cardiac positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging: a report from the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission database. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11:e007565

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lubbers M, Coenen A, Kofflard M et al (2018) Comprehensive Cardiac CT with myocardial perfusion imaging versus functional testing in suspected coronary artery disease: the multicenter, randomized CRESCENT-II trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:1625–1636

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baggiano A, Baessato F, Mushtaq S et al (2024) Stress CT perfusion and stress cardiac magnetic resonance for the management of suspected or known coronary artery disease: resources and outcomes impact. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 18:553–558

Dai X, Lan Z, Ling R et al (2023) Financial and clinical outcomes of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary CT angiography-guided versus coronary CT angiography-guided strategy. Eur Radiol 33:8191–8202

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY et al (2014) Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J 35:1120–1130

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Assen M, De Cecco CN, Eid M et al (2019) Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 13:26–33

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Daly CA, Stavola D, Sendon B (2006) Predicting prognosis in stable angina—results from the Euro Heart Survey of stable angina: prospective observational study. BMJ 332:262–267

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar