Calder PC, Feskens EJM, Kraneveld AD et al (2020) Towards “improved standards in the science of nutrition” through the establishment of federation of european nutrition societies working groups. Ann Nutr Metab 76:2–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506325

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bes-Rastrollo M, Schulze MB, Ruiz-Canela M, Martinez-Gonzalez MA (2013) Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 10:e1001578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cullerton K, Adams J, Forouhi N et al (2019) What principles should guide interactions between population health researchers and the food industry? Systematic scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Obes Rev 20:1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12851

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Plohl N, Musil B (2023) Assessing the incremental value of intellectual humility and cognitive reflection in predicting trust in science. Personal Individ Differ 214:112340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112340

Article  Google Scholar 

Anderson MS, Ronning EA, De Vries R, Martinson BC (2010) Extending the mertonian norms: scientists’ subscription to norms of research. J High Educ 81:366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095

Article  Google Scholar 

Hosseini M, Senabre Hidalgo E, Horbach SP et al (2024) Messing with Merton: the intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values. Account Res 31:428–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merton RK (1973) The normative structure of science. In: Merton RK (ed) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Google Scholar 

ALLEA-All European Academies (2017) The European code of conduct for research integrity. c/o Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities

Aubert Bonn N, Godecharle S, Dierickx K (2017) European universities’ guidance on research integrity and misconduct: accessibility, approaches, and content. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 12:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616688980

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aubert Bonn N, Pinxten W (2019) A decade of empirical research on research integrity: what have we (not) looked at? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 14:338–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619858534

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kleinert S (2010) Singapore statement: a global agreement on responsible research conduct. Lancet 376:1125–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61456-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hastings R, Labib K, Lechner I et al (2022) Guidance on research integrity provided by pan-European discipline-specific learned societies: a scoping review. Sci Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac067

Article  Google Scholar 

Daston L (1992) Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Soc Stud Sci 22:597–618

Article  Google Scholar 

Daston L, Galison P (1992) The image of objectivity. Representations. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928741

Article  Google Scholar 

Daston L (2002) Saintly resonances. Lond Rev Books 24:16–17

Google Scholar 

Douglas H (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh

Book  Google Scholar 

Elliott KC (2017) A tapestry of values: an introduction to values in science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Book  Google Scholar 

Fortun M (1998) Institutionalizing indirection: Science at the crossroads of scholarship and politics. Sci Cult 7:173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439809526500

Article  Google Scholar 

Soares MJ, Müller MJ, Boeing H et al (2019) Conflict of interest in nutrition research: an editorial perspective. Eur J Clin Nutr 73:1213–1215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-019-0488-8

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mecca JT, Gibson C, Giorgini V et al (2015) Researcher perspectives on conflicts of interest: a qualitative analysis of views from academia. Sci Eng Ethics 21:843–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9580-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oreskes N, Conway EM (2022) From anti-government to anti-science: why conservatives have turned against science. Daedalus 151:98–123. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01946

Article  Google Scholar 

Nestle M (2016) Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: science or marketing? JAMA Intern Med 176:13–14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6667

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mialon M, Serodio P, Crosbie E et al (2022) Conflicts of interest for members of the U.S. 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Public Health Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000672

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nestle M (2016) Food industry funding of nutrition research: the relevance of history for current debates. JAMA Intern Med 176:1685–1686. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5400

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Newton A, Lloyd-Williams F, Bromley H, Capewell S (2016) Food for thought? Potential conflicts of interest in academic experts advising government and charities on dietary policies. BMC Public Health 16:735. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3393-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sasson AN, Scaffidi MA, Bansal R et al (2019) Prevalence and relevance of financial conflicts of interest among clinical practice guidelines in nutrition. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2:354. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwz006.179

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krimsky S (2019) Conflicts of interest in science: how corporate-funded academic research can threaten public health. Simon and Schuster, New York

Google Scholar 

Shaw DM (2014) The prisoners’ dilemmas: authorship guidelines and impact factors: between a rock and a hard place. EMBO Rep 15:635–637

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shaw DM (2022) Withholding conflicts of interest: the many flaws of the new ICMJE disclosure form. J Med Ethics 48:19–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106136

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ioannidis JA, Trepanowski JF (2018) Disclosures in nutrition research: why it is different. JAMA 319:547–548. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18571

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cappola AR, FitzGerald GA (2015) Confluence, not conflict of interest: name change necessary. JAMA 314:1791–1792. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12020

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bourke B (2014) Positionality: reflecting on the research process. Qual Rep 19:1–9

Google Scholar 

Soedirgo J, Glas A (2020) Toward active reflexivity: positionality and practice in the production of knowledge. PS Polit Sci Polit 53:527–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519002233

Article  Google Scholar 

Bachórz A, Parasecoli F (2020) Why should we care? Two experiences in the politics of food and food research. Ethnol Polona. https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp.2020.41.2301

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Bouwel J (2021) Are transparency and representativeness of values hampering scientific pluralism? Science, freedom, democracy. Routledge, London, pp 181–205

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Hicks DJ, Lobato EJC (2022) Values disclosures and trust in science: a replication study. Front Commun. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1017362

Article  Google Scholar 

Field SM (2022) Charting the constellation of science reform. Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen

Simon S, Connolly J (2020) What do science teachers value? How can values change during professional learning? In: Corrigan D, Buntting C, Fitzgerald A, Jones A (eds) Values in science education: the shifting sands. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 121–137

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Longino HE (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Book  Google Scholar 

Oreskes N (2021) Why trust science? Princeton University Press, Princeton

Book