Yang L, Liu X, Li Z, Zhang P, Wu B, Wang H, et al. Genetic aetiology of early infant deaths in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Med Genet. 2020;57:169–77.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Meng L, Pammi M, Saronwala A, Magoulas P, Ghazi AR, Vetrini F, et al. Use of exome sequencing for infants in intensive care units: ascertainment of severe single-gene disorders and effect on medical management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:e173438.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tan TY, Dillon OJ, Stark Z, Schofield D, Alam K, Shrestha R, et al. Diagnostic impact and cost-effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing for ambulant children with suspected monogenic conditions. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:855–62.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wright CF, FitzPatrick DR, Firth HV. Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:253–68.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Clift K, Macklin S, Halverson C, McCormick JB, Abu Dabrh AM, Hines S. Patients’ views on variants of uncertain significance across indications. J Community Genet. 2020;11:139–45.
Tsai GJ, Rañola JMO, Smith C, Garrett LT, Bergquist T, Casadei S, et al. Outcomes of 92 patient-driven family studies for reclassification of variants of uncertain significance. Genet Med. 2019;21:1435–42.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
SoRelle JA, Thodeson DM, Arnold S, Gotway G, Park JY. Clinical utility of reinterpreting previously reported genomic epilepsy test results for pediatric patients. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:e182302.
So M-K, Jeong T-D, Lim W, Moon B-I, Paik NS, Kim SC, et al. Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:510–9.
Bennett JS, Bernhardt M, McBride KL, Reshmi SC, Zmuda E, Kertesz NJ, et al. Reclassification of variants of uncertain significance in children with inherited arrhythmia syndromes is predicted by clinical factors. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40:1679–87.
Wright M, Menon V, Taylor L, Shashidharan M, Westercamp T, Ternent CA. Factors predicting reclassification of variants of unknown significance. Am J Surg. 2018;216:1148–54.
Chen E, Facio FM, Aradhya KW, Rojahn S, Hatchell KE, Aguilar S, et al. Rates and classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary disease genetic testing. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2339571.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chourasia N, Vaidya R, Sengupta S, Mefford HC, Wheless J. A Retrospective review of reclassification of variants of uncertain significance in a pediatric epilepsy cohort undergoing genetic panel testing. Pediatr Neurol. 2024;161:101–7.
Zhang L, Shen M, Shu X, Zhou J, Ding J, Lin H, et al. The recommendation of re-classification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in adult genetic disorders patients. J Hum Genet. 2024;69:425–31.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Fowler DM, Rehm HL. Will variants of uncertain significance still exist in 2030? Am J Hum Genet. 2024;111:5–10.
Tavtigian SV, Harrison SM, Boucher KM, Biesecker LG. Fitting a naturally scaled point system to the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. Hum Mutat. 2020;41:1734–7.
Ellard S, Baple EL, Callaway A, Berry I, Forrester N, Turnbull C, et al. ACGS best practice guidelines for variant classification in rare disease 2020. http://www.acgs.uk.com/quality/best-practice-guidelines/.
Sequence Variant Interpretation, ClinGen. https://clinicalgenome.org/working-groups/sequence-variant-interpretation/.
Zhang J, Yao Y, He H, Shen J. Clinical interpretation of sequence variants. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2020;106:e98.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, Berg JS, Brown KK, Deignan JL, et al. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:733–47.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu Y, Cao Y, Ma L, Fan L, Pu W, Xia Y. Trichohepatoenteric syndrome and cytomegalovirus infection: case report and literature summary. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024;12:2050313X241248393.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ackerman MJ. Genetic purgatory and the cardiac channelopathies: exposing the variants of uncertain/unknown significance issue. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2325–31.
Mercati O, Abi Warde M-T, Lina-Granade G, Rio M, Heide S, de Lonlay P, et al. PRPS1 loss-of-function variants, from isolated hearing loss to severe congenital encephalopathy: new cases and literature review. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:104033.
Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, Middha S, McDonnell SK, Baheti S, et al. REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:877–85.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Pejaver V, Byrne AB, Feng B-J, Pagel KA, Mooney SD, Karchin R, et al. Calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for PP3/BP4 criteria. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109:2163–77.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
He W-B, Xiao W-J, Dai C-L, Wang Y-R, Li X-R, Gong F, et al. RNA splicing analysis contributes to reclassifying variants of uncertain significance and improves the diagnosis of monogenic disorders. J Med Genet. 2022;59:1010–6.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wenger AM, Guturu H, Bernstein JA, Bejerano G. Systematic reanalysis of clinical exome data yields additional diagnoses: implications for providers. Genet Med. 2017;19:209–14.
Macklin SK, Jackson JL, Atwal PS, Hines SL. Physician interpretation of variants of uncertain significance. Fam Cancer. 2019;18:121–6.
Cherny S, Olson R, Chiodo K, Balmert LC, Webster G. Changes in genetic variant results over time in pediatric cardiomyopathy and electrophysiology. J Genet Couns. 2021;30:229–36.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
David KL, Best RG, Brenman LM, Bush L, Deignan JL, Flannery D, et al. Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2019;21:769–71.
Comments (0)