This study compared the effects of a 25-min nap opportunity and a 10-min non-sleep deep rest (NSDR) condition on perceptual, cognitive, and physical performance in physically active young adults. Sixty participants (26 female, 34 male; 22 ± 4 years) were randomly assigned to one of three groups (nap, NSDR, control; n = 20 each). All groups completed identical assessments immediately, 20 min, and 40 min post-intervention. Mixed-effects models, adjusted for sex, prior-night sleep, and weekly physical activity, revealed a significant Group × Time interaction for sleepiness, fatigue, readiness to perform, and handgrip strength (p < 0.05). At 40 min post-intervention, the nap group reported lower fatigue than control and higher readiness to perform than both control and NSDR (p < 0.05). No significant effects were observed for the NSDR condition on perceptual, cognitive, or physical outcomes (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that a short nap can enhance perceived readiness and reduce fatigue after a brief latency period, whereas NSDR did not elicit significant effects under the present conditions.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Human Ethics Committee of La Trobe University gave ethical approval for this study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.