Objectives Compare Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores over time following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) between male and female patients aged 15 to 25 years with primary ACL injuries and ACL reinjuries.
Design Retrospective cohort design.
Setting Sports physical therapy clinics.
Participants 332 patients aged 15-25 years who underwent ACLR following either primary ACL injury or ACL reinjury, either contralateral or ipsilateral graft reinjury, and had at least one observation of the ACL-RSI.
Main Outcome Measures ACL-RSI score.
Results ACL-RSI scores significantly increased over time post- ACLR (p < .001), males reported significantly higher scores compared to females (p < .001), and patients with contralateral ACL reinjury demonstrated higher scores than those with ipsilateral ACL graft reinjury (p = .006), though there was no difference in scores between patients with primary ACL injury and ACL reinjury. A significant interaction effect of sex and injury status was also observed (p = .009), generally demonstrating that females had lower psychological readiness compared to males across injury statuses.
Conclusions ACL-RSI following ACLR varies based on biological sex and time post-ACLR, though ACL reinjury, independent of the reinjured leg, does not appear to effect scores compared to primary ACL injury.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Sanford Health Institutional Review Board granted this study an exemption (Study ID: 2390).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Comments (0)