Dental impressions are a routine component of prosthodontic care, yet the patient experience may vary depending on the technique used. This study compared dental anxiety and satisfaction among patients undergoing digital versus conventional impressions in a postgraduate clinical setting at the Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo. A total of 85 adult patients were included: 44 received conventional impressions and 41 received digital impressions. Dental anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) before the procedure, and satisfaction was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) immediately after the procedure. Anxiety scores did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.232). However, patients in the digital group reported significantly greater satisfaction than those in the conventional group (p < 0.001). These findings suggest an association between the use of digital impression techniques and higher levels of patient satisfaction, while no significant association was observed between impression technique and dental anxiety.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This research was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee for Research in Human Subjects of the UEES (CEISH UEES), which is authorized by the Ministry of Public Health of Ecuador to approve research. The approval code is C-UEES-25-01. Informed consent was obtained digitally via Google Form.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

No external funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest during the development of this research protocol.

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.