Efficacy Of Connective Tissue Graft Versus Titanium Papillary Inserts in the Surgical Reconstruction of Interdental Papilla: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

ABSTRACT

Aim and Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of titanium inserts for interdental papilla reconstruction, comparing it with the Han and Takei technique using subepithelial connective tissue grafts. The objectives included assessing the black triangle height, papilla height and papilla presence index (PPI) at baseline, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively along with the evaluation of Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) during the first week of post operative healing period.

Patients and Methods This single-blind randomized clinical trial included systemically healthy individuals aged 18–35 years with Nordland and Tarnow’s Class I–III papillary loss. A total of 18 participants were randomly assigned to either test group or control group. Clinical parameters were measured pre- and post-operatively at specified intervals. Both groups received standard presurgical care and postoperative follow-up. The surgical protocol for the test group involved titanium insert placement in the interdental bone, while the control group received a connective tissue graft using the Han and Takei method.

Results Both groups showed significant intragroup improvements in all parameters from baseline to 1 and 3 months (p<0.05). However, intergroup comparisons showed no significant differences at most time points, except at 3 months for PPI, where the control group showed significantly better results (p=0.04). EHS scores were not significant between the groups.

Conclusion Titanium inserts and CTG both demonstrated clinical effectiveness in enhancing interdental papilla dimensions. These findings support the titanium insert as a viable, less invasive alternative, offering clinicians a practical option for esthetic papilla reconstruction.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT07401667

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee of SVS Institute of dental sciences gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Comments (0)

No login
gif