Background The microbial aetiology of early childhood caries (ECC) in sub-Saharan African populations remains poorly characterised, with most studies focusing on conventional cariogenic pathogens like Streptococcus mutans. This study aimed to characterise the salivary microbial profile of children with ECC in urban Kano, northern Nigeria.

Methods In this cross-sectional study of 162 children aged 3–5 years in urban Kano, unstimulated saliva samples were collected and analysed using standard bacteriological culture methods. Caries status was assessed using decayed, missing, and filled teeth (dmft) index and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Microbial isolates were identified through Gram staining, colony morphology, and biochemical tests (catalase, coagulase, oxidase).

Results Of 32 microbial isolates obtained, Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent (43.8%, n=14), followed by Streptococcus species (28.1%, n=9), Klebsiella species (12.5%, n=4), non-aureus staphylococci (6.3%, n=2), yeast (6.3%, n=2), and Pseudomonas species (3.1%, n=1). Only one isolate demonstrated direct association with dmft-detectable caries. Polymicrobial colonisation occurred in four cases (12.5%), predominantly featuring S. aureus-yeast combinations (n=2). White spot lesions (ICDAS 1-2) were associated with S. aureus and Klebsiella species in two separate cases.

Conclusion This study reveals an unexpected predominance of S. aureus in the salivary microbiome of children in northern Nigeria, challenging conventional paradigms of ECC microbiology. The low correlation between microbial isolates and clinical caries suggests complex, multifactorial aetiology. These findings highlight the need for molecular characterisation of oral microbiomes in African populations and reconsideration of caries pathogenesis models in this unique epidemiological context.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Yes

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Kano State Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC/17/03/2018).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.