Validation of angiography-based FFR in non-culprit vessels of patients presenting with STEMI

Park DW, Clare RM, Schulte PJ, Pieper KS, Shaw LK, Califf RM et al (2014) Extent, location, and clinical significance of non-infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 312(19):2019–2027

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

David SW, Joan KM, Nicholas JW, Alexander JC, Richard JE, Liam OH et al (2013) Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 369(12):1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1305520

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, Mehran R, Bainey KR, Nguyen H et al (2019) Complete revascularization with multivessel PCI for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 381(15):1411–1421

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U et al (2019) 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 40(2):87–165

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM et al (2022) ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 145(3):e4–e17

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann FJ, Boxma-de Klerk BM, Lunde K, Schotborgh CE et al (2017) Fractional flow reserve-guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 376(13):1234–1244

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Puymirat E, Cayla G, Simon T, Steg PG, Montalescot G, Durand-Zaleski I et al (2021) Multivessel PCI guided by FFR or angiography for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 385(4):297–308

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biscaglia S, Guiducci V, Escaned J, Moreno R, Lanzilotti V, Santarelli A et al (2023) Complete or culprit-only PCI in older patients with myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 389(10):889–898

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee JM, Kim HK, Park KH, Choo EH, Kim CJ, Lee SH et al (2023) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided strategy in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a randomized trial. Eur Heart J 44(6):473–484

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Böhm F, Mogensen B, Engstrøm T, Stankovic G, Srdanovic I, Lønborg J et al (2024) FFR-guided complete or culprit-only PCI in patients with myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 390(16):1481–1492

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van der Hoeven NW, Janssens GN, de Waard GA, Everaars H, Broyd CJ, Beijnink CWH et al (2019) Temporal changes in coronary hyperemic and resting hemodynamic indices in nonculprit vessels of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol 4(8):736–744

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Legutko J, Niewiara L, Guzik B, Szolc P, Podolec J, Nosal M et al (2022) The impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction on the discordance between fractional flow reserve and resting full-cycle ratio in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Front Cardiovasc Med 9:1003067

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scoccia A, Neleman T, Ziedses des Plantes AC, Groenland FTW, J MRL, den Dekker WK, et al. (2023) Predictors of discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) in intermediate coronary lesions. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 47:101217

Masdjedi K, Tanaka N, Van Belle E, Porouchani S, Linke A, Woitek FJ et al (2022) Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) for the assessment of stenosis severity: the FAST II study. EuroIntervention 17(18):1498–1505

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scoccia A, Tomaniak M, Neleman T, Groenland FTW, Plantes A, Daemen J (2022) Angiography-based fractional flow reserve: state of the art. Curr Cardiol Rep 24(6):667–678

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Groenland FTW, Huang J, Scoccia A, Neleman T, Ziedses Des Plantes AC, Nuis RJ et al (2023) Vessel fractional flow reserve-based non-culprit lesion reclassification in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact on treatment strategy and clinical outcome (FAST STEMI I study). Int J Cardiol 373:33–8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, Berry C, Escaned J, Maas A et al (2020) An EAPCI expert consensus document on ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in collaboration with European society of cardiology working group on coronary pathophysiology & microcirculation endorsed by coronary vasomotor disorders international study group. Eur Heart J 41(37):3504–3520

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Huang J, Groenland FTW, Scoccia A, Ziedses des Plantes AC, Neleman T, Van Mieghem NM, Daemen J (2023) Acute-setting vs. staged-setting vessel fractional flow reserve of intermediate non-culprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (FAST STAGED study). Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 45:101192. S2352–9067(23)00023–4 [pii] 101192 [pii] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101192

Thim T, van der Hoeven NW, Musto C, Nijveldt R, Götberg M, Engstrøm T et al (2020) Evaluation and management of nonculprit lesions in STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13(10):1145–1154

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang L, Travieso A, van der Hoeven N, van Leeuwen MAH, Janssens G, Mejía-Rentería H et al (2023) Improved nonculprit stenosis assessment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using quantitative flow ratio. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 16(14):1828–1830

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee SH, Hong D, Shin D, Kim HK, Park KH, Choo EH et al (2023) QFR assessment and prognosis after nonculprit PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 16(19):2365–2379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.032

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andersen BK, Sejr-Hansen M, Maillard L, Campo G, Råmunddal T, Stähli BE et al (2024) Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularisation guidance (FAVOR III Europe): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 404(10465):1835–1846

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G et al (2021) Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet 398(10317):2149–2159

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Westra J, Sejr-Hansen M, Koltowski L, Mejía-Rentería H, Tu S, Kochman J et al (2022) Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: the QREP study. EuroIntervention 17(15):1252–1259

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Masdjedi K, van Zandvoort LJC, Balbi MM, Gijsen FJH, Ligthart JMR, Rutten MCM et al (2020) Validation of a three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based software to calculate fractional flow reserve: the FAST study. EuroIntervention 16(7):591–599

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scoccia A, Neleman T, Kardys I, Tanaka N, Van Belle E, Linke A et al (2022) Reproducibility of 3D Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR): a core laboratory variability analysis of FAST II Study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 44:101–102

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif