Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:333–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gardosi J, Kady SM, Mcgeown P, Francis A, Tonks A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331:1113–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 204American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e97–e109.

Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, et al. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ. 2013;346: f108.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Itabashi K, Fujimura M, Kusuda S, et al. Introduction of new standards for birth size by gestational age in Japan: report of the Neonatal Committee of the Japan Pediatric Society. J Jpn Pediatr Soc. 2010;114:1271–93.

Google Scholar 

Madden JV, Flatley CJ, Kumar S. Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:525-e1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mendez-Figueroa H, Truong VTT, Pedroza C, et al. Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:e1-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fung C, Zinkhan E. Short- and long-term implications of small for gestational age. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48:311–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hollo O, Rautava P, Korhonen T, et al. Academic achievement of small-for-gestational-age children at age 10 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:179–87.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crispi F, Figueras F, Cruz-Lemini M, et al. Cardiovascular programming in children born small for gestational age and relationship with prenatal signs of severity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:121.e1-121.e9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baschat AA. Neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction and its relationship with antepartum parameters of placental dysfunction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:501–14.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Katanoda K, Noda M, Goto A, et al. Impact of birth weight on adult-onset diabetes mellitus in relation to current body mass index: the Japan Nurses’ Health Study. J Epidemiol. 2017;27:428–34.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:80–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Sonographic evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:709–17.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shinozuka N. Fetal biometry and fetal weight estimation: JSUM standardization. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2002;2:156–61.

Article  Google Scholar 

Itakura A, Shoji S, Shigeru A, et al. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2023 edition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023;49:5–53.

Morris RK, Johnstone E, Lees C, et al. Investigation and care of a small-for-gestational-age fetus and a growth restricted fetus (Green-top Guideline No. 31). BJOG. 2024;131:e31-e80.

NETWORK NZMFM. Guideline for the management of suspected small for gestational age singleton pregnancies after 34 weeks gestation. 2014.

Vayssière C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:10–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:B2–17.

Mccowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:S855-68.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roeckner JT, Pressman K, Odibo L, et al. Outcome-based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57:925–30.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Okai T. Standard values of ultrasonographic fetal biometry: JSUM standardization. J Med Ultrason. 2003;30:415–40.

Google Scholar 

Takahashi Y, Ishii K, Honda K, et al. Establishment of reference ranges for ductus venosus waveform indices in the Japanese population. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2001;37:201–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:452–8.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Costa DASF, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:715–23.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

AIUM. AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:E13–E24.

Roma E, Arnau A, Berdala R, et al. Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks’ gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:391–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fadigas C, Saiid Y, Gonzalez R, et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35–37 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:559–65.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bakalis S, Silva M, Akolekar R, et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30–34 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:551–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shinozuka N, Masuda H, Kagawa H, et al. Standard values of ultrasonographic fetal biometry. Jpn J Med Ultrasonics. 1996;23:879–88 ([in Japanese]).

Google Scholar 

Tokoro S, Koshida S, Tsuji S, et al. Insufficient antenatal identification of fetal growth restriction leading to intrauterine fetal death: a regional population-based study in Japan. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36:2167075.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, et al. FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152:3–57.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Molina LCG, Odibo L, Zientara S, et al. Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:61–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD007529.

Triunfo S, Crispi F, Gratacos E, Figueras F. Prediction of delivery of small-for-gestational-age neonates and adverse perinatal outcome by fetoplacental Doppler at 37 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:364–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gordgin SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:333–9.

Article  Google Scholar