Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J. 2021;8:e188–94.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Venishetty N, Alkassis M, Raheem O. The role of artificial intelligence in male infertility: evaluation and treatment: a narrative review. Uro. 2024;4:23–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mouhawasse E, Haff CW, Kumar P, Lack B, Chu K, Bansal U, et al. Can AI chatbots accurately answer patient questions regarding vasectomies? Int J Impot Res. 2024;1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00970-y.

Razdan S, Siegal AR, Brewer Y, Sljivich M, Valenzuela RJ. Assessing chatGPT’s ability to answer questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction: can our patients trust it? Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:734–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sarker IH. Machine learning: algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. Sn Comput Sci. 2021;2:160.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Agarwal A, Henkel R, Huang CC, Lee MS. Automation of human semen analysis using a novel artificial intelligence optical microscopic technology. Andrologia. 2019;51:e13440.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shah M, Naik N, Somani BK, Hameed BZ. Artificial intelligence (AI) in urology-current use and future directions: an iTRUE study. Turk J Urol. 2020;46:S27–39.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hanassab S, Nelson SM, Akbarov A, Yeung AC, Hramyka A, Alhamwi T, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence to identify follicles that optimize clinical outcomes during assisted conception. Nat Commun. 2025;16:296.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mora-Sánchez A, Aguilar-Salvador DI, Nowak I. Towards a gamete matching platform: using immunogenetics and artificial intelligence to predict recurrent miscarriage. Npj Digit Med. 2019;2:1–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tsai VF, Zhuang B, Pong YH, Hsieh JT, Chang HC. Web- and artificial intelligence–based image recognition for sperm motility analysis: verification study. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8:e20031.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chung PH, Han TM, Rudnik B, Das AK. Peyronie’s disease: what do we know and how do we treat it? Can J Urol. 2020;27:11–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Muneer A. Hypogonadism: an underdiagnosed condition. Trends Urol Gynaecol Sex Health. 2010;15:14–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Baldwin K, Ginsberg P, Harkaway RC. Under-reporting of erectile dysfunction among men with unrelated urologic conditions. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:87–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liang Y, Huang J, Zhao Q, Mo H, Su Z, Feng S, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence and trends of infertility among individuals of reproductive age (15–49 years) from 1990–2021, with projections to 2040. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2025;40:529–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Leung AK, Henry MA, Mehta A. Gaps in male infertility health services research. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7:S303–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Eisenberg ML, Esteves SC, Lamb DJ, Hotaling JM, Giwercman A, Hwang K, et al. Male infertility. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2023;9:49.

Article  Google Scholar 

Olisa NP, Campo-Engelstein L, Martins Da Silva S. Male infertility: what on earth is going on? Pilot international questionnaire study regarding clinical evaluation and fertility treatment for men. Reprod Fertil. 2022;3:207–15.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ. 1992;305:609–13.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Jolles M, et al. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of samples collected globally in the 20th and 21st centuries. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29:157–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sengupta P, Dutta S, Krajewska-Kulak E. The disappearing sperms: analysis of reports published between 1980 and 2015. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11:1279–304.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

CDC. National ART summary. 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 17]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/2021/summary.html.

Gatimel N, Moreau J, Parinaud J, Léandri RD. Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017. Andrology. 2017;5:845–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bijar A, Benavent AP, Mikaeili M, Khayati R. Fully automatic identification and discrimination of sperm’s parts in microscopic images of stained human semen smear. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2012;05:384–95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real‐time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF‐ICSI outcome. J Androl. 2002;23:1–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Björndahl L, Kirkman Brown J. The sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen: ensuring quality and standardization in basic examination of human ejaculates. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:246–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Czubaszek M, Andraszek K, Banaszewska D, Walczak-Jędrzejowska R. The effect of the staining technique on morphological and morphometric parameters of boar sperm. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0214243.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Butola A, Popova D, Prasad DK, Ahmad A, Habib A, Tinguely JC, et al. High spatially sensitive quantitative phase imaging assisted with deep neural network for classification of human spermatozoa under stressed condition. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13118.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sahoo AJ, Kumar Y. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods. Technol Health Care. 2014;22:531–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ilhan HO, Serbes G, Aydin N. Automated sperm morphology analysis approach using a directional masking technique. Comput Biol Med. 2020;122:103845.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finelli R, Leisegang K, Tumallapalli S, Henkel R, Agarwal A. The validity and reliability of computer-aided semen analyzers in performing semen analysis: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10:3069–79.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yibre AM, Koçer B. Semen quality predictive model using feed forwarded neural network trained by learning-based artificial algae algorithm. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2021;24:310–8.

Google Scholar 

Parrella A, Rubio Riquelme N, Van Os Galdos LA, Vilella Amorós I, Jiménez Gadea M, Aizpurua J. P-110 a novel artificial intelligence microscopy: mojo AISA, the new way to perform semen analysis. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:deac107.106.

Article  Google Scholar 

Salih M, Austin C, Warty RR, Tiktin C, Rolnik DL, Momeni M, et al. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023:hoad031.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Berntsen J, Rimestad J, Lassen JT, Tran D, Kragh MF. Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences. PloS ONE. 2022;17:e0262661.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Borna MR, Sepehri MM, Maleki B. An artificial intelligence algorithm to select most viable embryos considering current process in IVF labs. Front Artif Intell. 2024;7:1375474.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

GhoshRoy D, Alvi PA, Santosh KC. Explainable AI to predict male fertility using extreme gradient boosting algorithm with SMOTE. Electronics. 2023;12:15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Javadi S, Mirroshandel SA. A novel deep learning method for automatic assessment of human sperm images. Comput Biol Med. 2019;109:182–94.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yüzkat M, Ilhan HO, Aydin N. Multi-model CNN fusion for sperm morphology an