Soubra A, Natale C, Brimley S, Hellstrom WJG. Revelations on men who seek penile augmentation surgery: a review. Sex Med Rev. 2022;10:460–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, Little, Brown. 1970

Loos S, De Wil P, Delcarte L, Serefoglu EC, Van Renterghem K, Ward S. The effect of penis size on partner sexual satisfaction: a literature review. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:519–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wilson SK, Gross MS. Celebrating 50 years of penile implants. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:596–600. Erratum in: Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:101.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

May E, Hanley M, Mulcahy JJ, Gross MS. Technological advances in penile implants: past, present, future. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:629–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jorissen C, De Bruyna H, Baten E, Van Renterghem K. Clinical outcome: patient and partner satisfaction after penile implant surgery. Curr Urol. 2019;13:94–100.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krishnappa P, Tripathi A, Shah R. Surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the low-cost, semi-rigid shah penile prosthesis: a boon to the developing countries. Sex Med. 2021;9:100399.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Deveci S, Martin D, Parker M, Mulhall JP. Penile length alterations following penile prosthesis surgery. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1128–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Habous M, Giona S, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Abdelwahab O, et al. Penile length is preserved after implant surgery. BJU Int. 2019;123:885–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Renterghem K, Jorissen C, Van Huele A. Penile length changes after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2023;20:1364–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Renterghem K, De Bruyn H, Jorissen C, Van Huele A, D’Anna M, Torremadé J, et al. Penile length after penile implant surgery is determined by stretched penile length before surgery. J Sex Med. 2025;22:165–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee KC, Brock GB. Strategies for maintaining penile size following penile implant. Transl Androl Urol. 2013;2:67–73.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJ. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med. 2013;10:893–906.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gaffney CD, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, Small AC, Kuehas FE, Egydio PH, et al. Lengthening strategies for Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:351–62.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Osterberg EC, Maganty A, Ramasamy R, Eid JF. Pharmacologically induced erect penile length and stretched penile length are both good predictors of post-inflatable prosthesis penile length. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26:128–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan JH, Lin HC, Dai YT. Prospective and long-term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:411–5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Canguven O, Talib RA, Campbell J, De Young L, El Ansari W, Al-Ansari A. Is the daily use of vacuum erection device for a month before penile prosthesis implantation beneficial? a randomized controlled trial. Andrology. 2017;5:103–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsambarlis PN, Chaus F, Levine LA. Successful placement of penile prostheses in men with severe corporal fibrosis following vacuum therapy protocol. J Sex Med. 2017;14:44–46.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Levine LA, Rybak J. Traction therapy for men with shortened penis prior to penile prosthesis implantation: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2112–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moskovic DJ, Pastuszak AW, Lipshultz LI, Khera M. Revision of penile prosthesis surgery after use of penile traction therapy to increase erect penile length: case report and review of the literature. J Sex Med. 2011;8:607–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yafi FA, Pinsky MR, Stewart C, Sangkum P, Ates E, Trost LW, et al. The effect of duration of penile traction therapy in patients undergoing intralesional injection therapy for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2015;194:754–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Toussi A, Ziegelmann M, Yang D, Manka M, Frank I, Boorjian SA, et al. Efficacy of a novel penile traction device in improving penile length and erectile function post prostatectomy: results from a single-center randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2021;206:416–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chung E, Bettocchi C, Egydio P, Love C, Osmonov D, Park S, et al. The international penile prosthesis implant consensus forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant. Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:534–46.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kashanian JA, Golan R, Sun T, Patel NA, Lipsky MJ, Stahl PJ, et al. Trends in penile prosthetics: influence of patient demographics, surgeon volume, and hospital volume on type of penile prosthesis inserted in New York State. J Sex Med. 2018;15:245–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Onyeji IC, Sui W, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, James MB, Theofanides MC, et al. Impact of surgeon case volume on reoperation rates after inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2017;197:223–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Hendin BN. Factors influencing the outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery at a teaching institution. Urology. 2003;62:918–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Henry GD, Kansal NS, Callaway M, Grigsby T, Henderson J, Noble J, et al. Centers of excellence concept and penile prostheses: an outcome analysis. J Urol. 2009;181:1264–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chung PH, Siegel JA, Tausch TJ, Klein AK, Scott JM, Morey AF. Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence? Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43:911–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moncada I, Krishnappa P, Ascencios J, Lopez I, Martinez-Salamanca JI. Home modeling after penile prosthesis implantation in the management of residual curvature in Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33:616–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Negro CL, Paradiso M, Rocca A, Bardari F. Implantation of AMS 700 LGX penile prosthesis preserves penile length without the need for penile lengthening procedures. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:114–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim KS, Bae WJ, Kim SW, Lee MY. Experience with AMS 700 LGX penile prostheses for preserving penile length in Korea. BMC Urol. 2019;19:6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cinar NB, Saribacak A, Atwater BL, Gross MS, Wilson SK, Culha M. Patient satisfaction study for the new Rigicon Infla10 inflatable penile prosthesis including single surgeon safety and outcomes data. J Sex Med. 2025;22:344–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wallen JJ, Madiraju SK, Wang R, Henry GD. Implementation of length expanding inflatable penile prosthesis is not sufficient to prevent postsurgical penile shortening. Asian J Androl. 2019;21:98–100.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bivalacqua TJ, Allen BK, Brock G, Broderick GA, Kohler TS, Mulhall JP, et al. Acute ischemic priapism: an AUA/SMSNA guideline. J Urol. 2021;206:1114–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zacharakis E, Garaffa G, Raheem AA, Christopher AN, Muneer A, Ralph DJ. Penile prosthesis insertion in patients with refractory ischaemic priapism: early vs delayed implantation. BJU Int. 2014;114:576–81.

Article  PubMed