Influence of crown-implant ratio on photofuntcionalized short implants success rates: 5 year follow-up prospective study

Duong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stähli A, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Sculean A (2022) Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses. Periodontol 2000 88(1):201–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12419

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rues S, Schmitter M, Kappel S, Sonntag R, Kretzer JP, Nadorf J (2021) Effect of bone quality and quantity on the primary stability of dental implants in a simulated bicortical placement. Clin Oral Investig 25(3):1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03432-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosas-Díaz J, Guerrero ME, Galindo-Gómez M, García-Luna M, Espinoza-Figini E, Cayo-Rojas C (2024) The importance of bone quality diagnostics in preventing displacement of dental implants within the mandibular body: A case report. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 14(5):429–435. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_85_24

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2017) Bone quality and quantity and dental implant failure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont 30(3):219–237. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5142

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ergun G, Nagas IC, Yilmaz D, Ozturk M (2011) Prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous ridges following alveolar distraction osteogenesis: clinical report of three cases. J Oral Implantol 37:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dam VV, Trinh HA, Rokaya D, Trinh DH (2022) Bone augmentation for implant placement: recent advances. Int J Dent.:8900940

Alshamrani AM, Mubarki M, Alsager AS, Alsharif HK, AlHumaidan SA, Al-Omar A (2023) Maxillary sinus lift procedures: an overview of current techniques, presurgical evaluation, and complications. Cureus 15(11):e49553. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49553

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schaaf H, Lendeckel S, Howaldt HP, Streckbein P (2010) Donor site morbidity after bone harvesting from the anterior iliac crest. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology.;109:52–58

Reininger D (2016) Carlos Cobo-Vázquez, Marta Monteserín-Matesanz, Juan López-Quiles complications in the use of the mandibular body, Ramus and symphysis as donor sites in bone graft surgery. Syst Rev Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21:241–249

Article  Google Scholar 

Al-Almaie S, Kavarodi AM, Al Faidhi A, Alorf A, Alzahrani SA (2020) Incidence of neurosensory disturbance and success rates of Solid-Screw implants placed in conjunction with inferior alveolar nerve transposition. Ann Maxillofac Surg 10(1):80–87. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_160_19

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cooper LF (2000) A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 84:522–534

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Renouard F, Nisand D (2006) Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:35–51

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pardo-Zamora G, Ortiz-Ruíz AJ, Camacho-Alonso F, Martínez-Marco JF, Molina-González JM, Piqué-Clusella N, Vicente-Hernández A (2021) Short dental implants (≤ 8.5 mm) versus standard dental implants (≥ 10 mm): A One-Year Post-Loading prospective observational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(11):5683. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115683

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bérczy K, Göndöcs G, Komlós G, Shkolnik T, Szabó G, Németh Z (2024) Outcomes of treatment with short dental implants compared with standard-length implants: a retrospective clinical study. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 46(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-024-00419-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Uehara PN, Matsubara VH, Igai F, Sesma N, Mukai M, Araujo MG (2018) Short dental implants (≤ 7 mm) versus longer implants in augmented bone area: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Open Dent J 12:354–365. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010354

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sáenz-Ravello G, Ossandón-Zúñiga B, Muñoz-Meza V et al (2023) Short implants compared to regular dental implants after bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior mandible: umbrella review and meta-analysis of success outcomes. Int J Implant Dent. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00476-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Emfietzoglou R, Dereka X (2024) Survival rates of short dental implants (≤ 6 mm) used as an alternative to longer (> 6 mm) implants for the rehabilitation of posterior partial Edentulism: A systematic review of RCTs. Dent J (Basel) 12(6):185. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12060185

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tutak M, Smektała T, Schneider K, Gołębiewska E, Sporniak-Tutak K (2013) Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: a review of the literature. Med Sci Monit 19:1037–1042. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889665

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kligman S, Ren Z, Chung CH, Perillo MA, Chang YC, Koo H, Zheng Z, Li C (2021) The impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration and biofilm formation. J Clin Med 10(8):1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081641

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Putta YR, Suresh N (2025) Platinum-Coated titanium Nanotubes- enhancing the corrosion resistance and biomineralization. Bull Stomatology Maxillofacial Surg 21(3):15–22. https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.3-15

Article  Google Scholar 

Gianluca Botticelli D, Kostandini TP,Giovanni, Falisi M, Severino A, Scarano S, Rastelli (2025) Use of the electrical device on implants bacterial biofilm:A preliminary in vitro study.Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery.;21(2):5–12.https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2025.2-5

Parkavi Arumugam SR, Bhonsle SS, Gummaluri B, Ramanarayana (2025) Development and characterization of selenium conversion coating on titanium dental implants for improved osseointegration. Bull Stomatology Maxillofacial Surg 21(3):291–302. https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X2025.3-291

Chang LC (2022) Clinical applications of photofunctionalization on dental implant surfaces: A narrative review. J Clin Med 1:5823

Article  Google Scholar 

Choi B, Lee YC, Oh KC, Lee JH (2020) Effects of photofunctionalization on early osseointegration of titanium dental implants in the maxillary posterior region: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Int J Implant Dent 7:37

Article  Google Scholar 

Ghambaryan N (2024) Impact of dental implant surface UV-photofunctionalization on osseointegration and antibacterial properties: systematic review. Bull Stomatology Maxillofacial Surg 20(2):152–160. https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006X-2024.2-152

Article  Google Scholar 

Ghambaryan N, Jilavyan A, Khachatryan G, Mathevosyan D, Tunyan G, Hakobyan G (2022) Evaluation of the survival rate of short implants placed in the posterior atrophic mandible: 5-year clinical study. Quintessence Int 53:690–696

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghambaryan N, Yessayan L, Hakobyan G Long-term effectiveness of UV functionalised short (≤ 6 mm) dental implants placed in the posterior segments of the atrophied maxilla: controlled case series.Odontology.2024;25.

Ghambaryan N, Jilavyan A, Burnazyan S, Khudaverdyan M, Gegham T, Hakobyan G (2023) Clinical outcome of immediate loading UV-Photofunctionalized implants in patients with completely edentulous mandible, placed with guided surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 22:64–75

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tang Y, Yu H, Wang J, Gao M, Qiu L (2020) Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 22(1):119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12881

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yuan X, Liu Y, Yang Y et al (2023) Effect of short implant crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration rates. BMC Oral Health 23:683. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03379-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Anitua E, Piñas L, Orive G (2015) Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17(1):102–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12073

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Malchiodi L, Ricciardi G, Salandini A, Caricasulo R, Cucchi A, Ghensi P (2020) Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rate of ultra-short dental implants: results of a 8- to 10-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 24(9):3213–3222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03195-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mangano F, Frezzato I, Frezzato A, Veronesi G, Mortellaro C, Mangano C (2016) The effect of Crown-to-Implant ratio on the clinical performance of Extra-Short Locking-Taper implants. J Craniofac Surg 27(3):675–681. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002562

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen Z, Li W, Li P (2023) Effects of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone level and bone density in non-splinted single implants: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 23:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03014-x

Article  CAS 

Comments (0)

No login
gif