Rajpurkar P, Chen E, Banerjee O, Topol EJ (2022) AI in health and medicine. Nat Med 28(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
ChatGPT open ai. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/. Accessed May 11, 2023
Li Y, Gao W, Luan Z, Zhou Z, Li J (2023) The Impact of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) on oncology: application, expectations, and future prospects. Cureus. Published online. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48670
(2023) Will ChatGPT transform healthcare? Nat Med 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02289-5
Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T et al (2023) How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Med Educ 9:e453212. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A et al (2023) Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Heal 2(2 February):e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M et al (2023) Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med 183(6):589. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Goodman RS, Patrinely JR, Stone CA, et al (2023) Accuracy and reliability of chatbot responses to physician questions. JAMA Netw Open. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36483
Lee Reicher, Guy Lutsker, Nadav Michaan, Dan Grisaru IL. Exploring the role of artificial intelligence, large language models: comparing patient-focused information and clinical decision support capabilities to the gynecologic oncology guidelines. Int J Gynecol Obstet. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15869
Chen D, Parsa R, Hope A, Hannon B, Mak E, Eng L, Liu F-F, Fallah-Rad N, Heesters AM, Raman S (2024) Physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to cancer questions from social media. JAMA Oncol 10(7):956–960
Liu S, Wright AP, Patterson BL et al (2023) Using AI-generated suggestions from ChatGPT to optimize clinical decision support. J Am Med Inf Assoc 30(7):1237. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad072
Ebrahimi B, Howard A, Carlson DJ, Al-Hallaq H (2023) ChatGPT: can a natural language processing tool be trusted for radiation oncology use? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 116(5):977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.075
Goddard J (2023) Hallucinations in ChatGPT: a cautionary tale for biomedical researchers. Am J Med 136(11):1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.06.012
Thorp HH (2023) ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science (80-) 379(6630):6630. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Haman M, Školník M (2023) Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review. Account Res. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Ahmadsei M et al (2023) Potential of ChatGPT in facilitating research in radiation oncology? Radiother Oncol 188:109894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109894
Stokel-Walker C (2023) ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature 613(7945):620. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen S, Kann BH, Foote MB et al (2023) Use of artificial intelligence chatbots for cancer treatment information. JAMA Oncol 9(10):1459. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2954
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, Christiansen SL (2023) Nonhuman “authors” and implications for the integrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JAMA 329(8):637. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.1344
Dennstädt F, Hastings J, Putora PM et al (2024) Exploring capabilities of large language models such as ChatGPT in radiation oncology. Adv Radiat Oncol 9(3):101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101400
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Holmes J, Liu Z, Zhang L, et al (2023) Evaluating large language models on a highly-specialized topic, radiation oncology physics. Front Oncol 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1219326
Rydzewski NR, Dinakaran D, Zhao SG, Ruppin E, Turkbey B, Citrin DE, Patel KR (2024) Comparative evaluation of LLMs in clinical oncology. NEJM AI 1(5). https://doi.org/10.1056/AIoa2300151
Huang Y, Gomaa A, Semrau S et al (2023) Benchmarking ChatGPT-4 on a radiation oncology in-training exam and Red Journal Gray Zone cases: potentials and challenges for ai-assisted medical education and decision making in radiation oncology. Front Oncol 13:1265024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1265024
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chow R, Hasan S, Zheng A, Gao C, Valdes G, Yu F, Chhabra A, Raman S, Choi JI, Lin H, Simone CB (2024) The accuracy of artificial intelligence ChatGPT in oncology examination questions. J Am Coll Radiol. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.07.011
Floyd W, Kleber T, Carpenter DJ et al (2024) Current strengths and weaknesses of ChatGPT as a resource for radiation oncology patients and providers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 118(4):305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.020
Comments (0)