Burk-Rafel J, Jones RL, Farlow JL. Engaging learners to advance medical education. Acad Med. 2017;92:437–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harvey MM, Berkley HH, O’Malley PG, Durning SJ. Preparing future medical educators: development and pilot evaluation of a student-led medical education elective. Mil Med. 2020;185:e131–7.

Google Scholar 

Dhaese SM, Van de Caveye I, Bussche PV, Bogaert S, De Maeseneer J. Student participation: to the benefit of both the student and the faculty. Educ Health. 2015;28:79–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

den Bakker CR, Hendriks RA, Houtlosser M, Dekker FW, Norbart AF. Twelve tips for fostering the next generation of medical teachers. Med Teach. 2022;44:725–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Geraghty JR, Young AN, Berkel TD, Wallbruch E, Mann J, Park YS, et al. Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: a value-added approach to student engagement in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9:60–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Milles LS, Hitzblech T, Drees S, Wurl W, Arends P, Peters H. Student engagement in medical education: a mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development. Med Teach. 2019;41:1143–50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Khan H, Smith EE, Reusch RT. Shifting medical student involvement in curriculum design: from liaisons to cocreators. Acad Med. 2022;97:623–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kassab SE, El-Sayed W, Hamdy H. Student engagement in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2022;56:703–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mukhalalati BA, Taylor A. Adult learning theories in context: a quick guide for healthcare professional educators. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019;6:238212051984033.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ogrinc G, Nierenberg DW, Batalden PB. Building experiential learning about quality improvement into a medical school curriculum: the Dartmouth experience. Health Aff. 2011;30:716–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bartlett CS, Huerta SA. Creating change: an experiential quality improvement and patient safety curriculum for medical students. MedEdPORTAL. 2018;14:10660.

Article  Google Scholar 

Student Organizations. [Internet]. University of California, San Francisco, (UCSF) Medical Education. [cited 2023 Nov 8]. Available from: https://meded.ucsf.edu/current-students/student-services/student-organizations.

Student Medical Education Committee (SMEC) [Internet]. Georgetown School of Medicine. [cited 2023 Nov 8]. Available from: https://som.georgetown.edu/smec/.

Schrand T. Design thinking as a strategy for consensus in general education reform. Peer Rev. 2016;18:17–21.

Google Scholar 

Brown Wilson C, Slade C. From consultation and collaboration to consensus: introducing an alternative model of curriculum development. Int J Acad Dev. 2020;25:189–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boon K, Turner J. Ethical and professional conduct of medical students: review of current assessment measures and controversies. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:221–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Anselmi KK, Glasgow MES, Gambescia SF. Using a nursing student conduct committee to foster professionalism among nursing students. J Prof Nurs. 2014;30:481–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Badwan B, Bothara R, Latijnhouwers M, Smithies A, Sandars J. The importance of design thinking in medical education. Med Teach. 2018;40:425–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Meeuwissen SNE, Whittingham JRD. Student participation in undergraduate medical education: a continuous collective endeavour. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;9:3–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Forrest LL, Geraghty JR. Student-led initiatives and advocacy in academic medicine: empowering the leaders of tomorrow. Acad Med. 2022;97:781–5.

Article  Google Scholar