Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Friedman DS, Foster PJ, Aung T, He M. Angle closure and angle-closure glaucoma: what we are doing now and what we will be doing in the future. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(4):381–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02774.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ang LP, Aung T, Chua WH, Yip LW, Chew PT. Visual field loss from primary angle-closure glaucoma: a comparative study of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1636–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.032.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang L, Huang W, Huang S, et al. Ten-year incidence of primary angle closure in elderly Chinese: the Liwan Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(3):355–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311808.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thomas R, George R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Jacob A. Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(4):450–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.4.450.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wilensky JT, Kaufman PL, Frohlichstein D, Gieser DK, Kass MA, Ritch R, Anderson R. Follow-up of angle-closure glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(3):338–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73585-8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alsbirk FH. Anatomical risk factors in primary angle-closure glaucoma. A ten year follow up survey based on limbal and axial anterior chamber depths in a high risk population. Int Ophthalmol. 1992;16(4–5):265–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917973.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

He M, Jiang Y, Huang S, Chang DS, Munoz B, Aung T, Foster PJ, Friedman DS. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10181):1609–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(18)32607-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aptel F, Denis P. Optical coherence tomography quantitative analysis of iris volume changes after pharmacologic mydriasis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.030.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moghimi S, Vahedian Z, Fakhraie G, et al. Ocular biometry in the subtypes of angle closure: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(4):664-673.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.014.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu BY, Friedman DS, Foster PJ, et al. Ocular biometric risk factors for progression of primary angle closure disease: the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(3):267–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.10.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramani KK, Mani B, George RJ, Lingam V. Follow-up of primary angle closure suspects after laser peripheral iridotomy using ultrasound biomicroscopy and A-scan biometry for a period of 2 years. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(7):521–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c12d.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neoh FP, Y A , Siti AA, Liza-Sharmini AT. Anterior segment biometry in primary angle closure glaucoma patients with visual field progression: comparison between Malays and Chinese. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2023;17(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1391.

Wang YE, Li Y, Wang D, He M, Lin S. Comparison of factors associated with occludable angle between american Caucasians and ethnic Chinese. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(12):7717–23. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12850.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang N, Ouyang J, Zhou W, Lai M, Ye T, Zeng M, Chen J. Multiple patterns of angle closure mechanisms in primary angle closure glaucoma in Chinese. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2000;36(1):46–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song MK, Shin JW, Sung KR. Factors associated with deterioration of primary angle closure after lens extraction. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2557. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092557.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Song MK, Sung KR, Shin JW, Jo YH, Won HJ. Glaucomatous progression after lens extraction in primary angle closure disease spectrum. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(8):711–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001537.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nonaka A, Kondo T, Kikuchi M, Yamashiro K, Fujihara M, Iwawaki T, Yamamoto K, Kurimoto Y. Cataract surgery for residual angle closure after peripheral laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(6):974–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.042.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stock RA, Röhrig MW, Mezzomo CD, Bonamigo EL. Phacoemulsification: an alternative for prophylaxis of a glaucomatous crisis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;5(13):1721–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S223496.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kurysheva NI, Pomerantsev AL, Rodionova OY, Sharova GA. Comparison of lens extraction versus laser iridotomy on anterior segment, choroid, and intraocular pressure in primary angle closure using machine learning. J Glaucoma. 2023;32(6):e43–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002145.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bo J, Changulani T, Cheng ML, Tatham AJ. Outcome following laser peripheral iridotomy and predictors of future lens extraction. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(3):275–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000863.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

He M, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Khaw PT. Angle-closure glaucoma in East Asian and European people. Different diseases? Eye (Lond). 2006;20(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701797.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koh V, Keshtkaran MR, Hernstadt D, Aquino MCD, Chew PT, Sng C. Predicting the outcome of laser peripheral iridotomy for primary angle closure suspect eyes using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(1):e57–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13822.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kumar RS, Baskaran M, Chew PT, et al. Prevalence of plateau iris in primary angle closure suspects an ultrasound biomicroscopy study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):430–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.026.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cho HK, Kee C, Yang H, et al. Comparison of circumferential peripheral angle closure using iridotrabecular contact index after laser iridotomy versus combined laser iridotomy and iridoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(7):e539–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13450.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1389–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30956-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhou M, Wang W, Huang W, et al. Is increased choroidal thickness association with primary angle closure? Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(7):e514–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12403.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurysheva NI, Rodionova OYe, Pomerantsev AL, Sharova GA. Comparative study of predictors of hypotensive efficacy of laser peripheral iridotomy and lensectomy in patients with primary anterior chamber angle closure based on machine learning methods. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2023;85:104884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104884.

Vercellin ACV, Harris A, Cordell JV, Do T, Moroney J, Belamkar A, Siesky B. Mathematical modeling and glaucoma: the need for an individualized approach to risk assessment. J Model Ophthalmol. 2016;1:6–20.

Google Scholar 

Harris A, Guidoboni G, Arciero JC, Amireskandari A, Tobe LA, Siesky BA. Ocular hemodynamics and glaucoma: the role of mathematical modeling. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23(2):139–46. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000255.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Norman RE, Flanagan JG, Sigal IA, Rausch SM, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR. Finite element modeling of the human sclera: influence on optic nerve head biomechanics and connections with glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2011;93(1):4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2010.09.014.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Szopos M, Cassani S, Guidoboni G, Prud'Homme C, Sacco R et al. Mathematical modeling of aqueous humor flow and intraocular pressure under uncertainty: towards individualized glaucoma management. J Model Ophthalmol. 2016;2:29–39.

Zhao YB, Chen B, Li D. Optimization of surgical protocol for laser iridotomy based the numerical simulation of aqueous flow. Math Biosci Eng. 2019;16(6):7405–20. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2019370.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nunez R, Harris A, Ibrahim O, et al. Artificial intelligence to aid glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring: state of the art and new directions. Photonics. 2022;9(11):810. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9110810.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rodionova O, Kurysheva N, Sharova G, Pomerantsev A. Expanding the DD-SIMCA concept: a case study of precision medicine. Anal Chim Acta. 2023;1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.340958.

Zou D, Guidoboni G, Keller J, Wikle C, Robinson EL, Rai R, Lin M, Nunez R, Verticchio A, Siesky BA, et al. Vascular physiology-informed machine learning to identify similar subgroups of glaucoma patients across studies: Indianapolis Glaucoma Progression Study, Thessaloniki Eye Study, and Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Disease Study. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63:2023-A0464.

Google Scholar 

Kim SJ, Cho KJ, Oh S. Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177726.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rahimy E. Deep learning applications in ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(3):254–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000470.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Li L, et al. Establishment and comparison of algorithms for detection of primary angle closure suspect based on static and dynamic anterior segment parameters. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(5):16. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.5.16.

Article