Ahmadi, H., L. Aghebati-Maleki, S. Rashidiani, T. Csabai, O.B. Nnaemeka, and J. Szekeres-Bartho. 2023. Long-term effects of ART on the health of the offspring. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 (17): 13564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713564.

Article  Google Scholar 

Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2024. Fertility giant Monash IVF settles class action with more than 700 patients over inaccurate embryo screening test. ABC News, 22 August 2024. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-08-22/monash-ivf-class-action-lawsuit-settlement-embryo/104256328. Accessed 21 Nov 2024.

Avery, Kevin. 2016. Disability and the three traditional Chinese belief systems Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism. ChinaSource, 7 March 2016. https://www.chinasource.org/resource-library/articles/disability-and-the-three-traditional-chinese-belief-systems/. Accessed 21 Nov 2024.

Barlevy, D., I. Cenolli, T. Campbell, R. Furrer, M. Mukherjee, K. Kostick-Quenet, S. Carmi, T. Lencz, G. Lázaro-Muñoz, and S. Pereira. 2024. Patient interest in and clinician reservations on polygenic embryo screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 41 (5): 1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03074-0.

Article  Google Scholar 

Capalbo, A., M. Fabiani, S. Caroselli, M. Poli, L. Girardi, C. Patassini, F. Favero, D. Cimadomo, A. Vaiarelli, C. Simon, L.F. Rienzi, and F.M. Ubaldi. 2021. Clinical validity and utility of preconception expanded carrier screening for the management of reproductive genetic risk in IVF and general population. Human Reproduction Update 36 (7): 2050–2061. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab087.

Article  Google Scholar 

Capalbo, A., M. Poli, C. Jalas, E.J. Forman, and N.R. Treff. 2022. On the reproductive capabilities ofaneuploid human preimplantation embryos. American Journal of Human Genetics 109 (9): 1572–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.07.009 .

Capalbo, A., G. de Wert, H. Mertes, L. Klausner, E. Coonen, F. Spinella, H. Van de Velde, S. Viville, K. Sermon, N. Vermeulen, T. Lencz, and S. Carmi. 2024. Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations. Human Reproduction Update 30 (5): 529–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmae012.

Carter, C.O. 1977. Monogenic disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics 14 (5): 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.14.5.316.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chin, A.H.B., Q. Al-Balas, M.F. Ahmad, N. Alsomali, and M. Ghaly. 2024a. Islamic perspectives on polygenic testing and selection of IVF embryos (PGT-P) for optimal intelligence and other non-disease-related socially desirable traits. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 21 (3): 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10293-0.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chin, A.H.B., L.W. Lim, and S.M. Muhsin. 2024b. Regulatory safeguards needed if preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk scores (PGT-P) is permitted in Singapore. Journal of Medical Ethics 52 (2): 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109195.

Chin, A.H.B., R. Roslan, and S.M. Muhsin. 2024c. Malaysian IVF patients must be warned about US lawsuits involving PGT-A (PGS). Ova, 5 November 2024. https://ova.galencentre.org/malaysian-ivf-patients-must-be-warned-about-us-lawsuits-involving-pgt-a-pgs-dr-alexis-heng-boon-chin-dr-rosazra-roslan-dr-sayyed-mohammed-muhsin/. Accessed 10 Feb 2025.

Chin, A.H.B. 2022. Singapore should ban picking genetically best embryos. Union of Catholic Asian News, 29 July 2022. https://www.ucanews.com/news/singapore-should-ban-picking-genetically-best-embryos/98213. Accessed 10 Feb 2025.

Chin, A.H.B. 2023. Widespread embryo genetic testing (PGT-A) in Malaysia may not benefit IVF success rates. Ova, 10 April 2023. https://ova.galencentre.org/widespread-embryo-genetic-testing-pgt-a-in-malaysia-may-not-benefit-ivf-success-rates-dr-alexis-heng-boon-chin/. Accessed 10 Feb 2025.

Chin, A.H.B. 2024. Non-judicious uptake of PGT-A in Malaysia is driven by sociocultural factors. BioNews 1266, 25 November 2024. https://www.progress.org.uk/non-judicious-uptake-of-pgt-a-in-malaysia-is-driven-by-sociocultural-factors/. Accessed 10 Feb 2025.

Coticchio, G., A. Barrie, C. Lagalla, A. Borini, S. Fishel, D. Grifn, and A. Campbell. 2021. Plasticity of the human preimplantation embryo: developmental dogmas, variations on themes and self-correction. Human Reproduction Update 27 (5): 848–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab016.

Article  Google Scholar 

Crespi, Bernard J. 2016. Autism as a disorder of high intelligence. Frontiers in Neuroscience 10: 300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00300.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cyranoski, D. 2017. China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions. Nature 548 (7667): 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/548272a.

Article  Google Scholar 

Esoh, K., and A. Wonkam. 2021. Evolutionary history of sickle-cell mutation: implications for global genetic medicine. Human Molecular Genetics 30 (R1): R119–R128. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddab004.

Article  Google Scholar 

Furrer, R., S. Carmi, T. Lencz, and G. Lázaro-Muñoz. 2023. Nurtured genetics: prenatal testing and the anchoring of genetic expectancies. American Journal of Bioethics 23 (3): 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2169397.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ginod, P., and M.H. Dahan. 2023. Polygenic embryo screening: are there potential maternal and fetal harms? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 47 (6): 103327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103327.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ginod, P., and M.H. Dahan. 2024. Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenetic conditions: a legal, ethical, and scientific challenge. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 42 (1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782618.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gleicher, N., D.F. Albertini, D.H. Barad, H. Homer, D. Modi, M. Murtinger, P. Patrizio, R. Orvieto, S. Takahashi, A. Weghofer, S. Ziebe, N. Noyes, and the International Do No Harm Group in IVF (IDNHG-IVF). 2020. The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 18 (1): 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00616-w.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gleicher, N., D.H. Barad, P. Patrizio, S. Gayete-Lafuente, A. Weghofer, Z.B. Rafael, S. Takahashi, D. Glujovsky, B.W. Mol, and R. Orvieto. 2024. An additive opinion to the committee opinion of ASRM and SART on the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 42: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03318-z.

Haining, C.M., J. Savulescu, L. Keogh, and G.O. Schaefer. 2024. Polygenic risk scores and embryonic screening: considerations for regulation. Journal of Medical Ethics 51 (10): 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110145.

He, X., X. Wang, J. Shen, B. Wan, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, L. Cai, Y. Bao, H. Ding, and X. Li. 2023. Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for women with subfertility in China: an economic evaluation using evidence from the CESE-PGS trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23 (1): 254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05563-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang, W., X. Li, H. Yang, and H. Huang. 2024. The impact of maternal age on aneuploidy in oocytes: reproductive consequences, molecular mechanisms, and future directions. Ageing Research Reviews 97: 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102292.

Article  Google Scholar 

Janssen, A.E.J., R.M. Koeck, R. Essers, P. Cao, W. van Dijk, M. Drüsedau, J. Meekels, B. Yaldiz, M. van de Vorst, B. de Koning, D.M.E.I. Hellebrekers, S.J.C. Stevens, S.M. Sun, M. Heijligers, S.A. de Munnik, C.M.J. van Uum, J. Achten, L. Hamers, M. Naghdi, L.E.L.M. Vissers, R.J.T. van Golde, G. de Wert, J.C.F.M. Dreesen, C. de Die-Smulders, E. Coonen, H.G. Brunner, A. van den Wijngaard, A.D.C. Paulussen, and Esteki M. Zamani. 2024. Clinical-grade whole genome sequencing-based haplarithmisis enables all forms of preimplantation genetic testing. Nature Communications 15 (1): 7164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51508-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jayashankar, S.S., M.L. Nasaruddin, M.F. Hassan, R.A. Dasrilsyah, M.N. Shafiee, N.A.S. Ismail, and E. Alias. 2023. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): reliability, challenges, and future directions. Diagnostics 13 (15): 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152570.

Joffe, B., and P. Zimmet. 1998. The thrifty genotype in type 2 diabetes: an unfinished symphony moving to its finale? Endocrine 9 (2): 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:9:2:139.

Article  Google Scholar 

Karavani, E., O. Zuk, D. Zeevi, N. Barzilai, N.C. Stefanis, A. Hatzimanolis, N. Smyrnis, D. Avramopoulos, L. Kruglyak, G. Atzmon, M. Lam, T. Lencz, and S. Carmi. 2019. Screening human embryos for polygenic traits has limited utility. Cell 179 (6): 1424-1435.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.033.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kariuki, S.N., and T.N. Williams. 2020. Human genetics and malaria resistance. Human Genetics 139 (6–7): 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02142-6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kayama, M., W. Haight, M.L.M. Ku, M. Cho, and H.Y. Lee. 2017. East Asian and US educators’ reflections on how stigmatization affects their relationships with parents whose children have disabilities: challenges and solutions. Children and Youth Services Review 73: 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.12.010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kucherov, A., M. Fazzari, H. Lieman, G.D. Ball, K. Doody, and S. Jindal. 2023. PGT-A is associated with reduced cumulative live birth rate in first reported IVF stimulation cycles age ≤ 40: an analysis of 133,494 autologous cycles reported to SART CORS. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 40 (1): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02667-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Leaver, M., and D. Wells. 2020. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics? Human Reproduction Update 26 (1): 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz033.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee, M., K.T. Lofgren, A. Thomas, A. Lanes, R. Goldman, E.S. Ginsburg, and M.D. Hornstein. 2021. The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in vitro fertilization cycles. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 225 (1): 55.e1–55.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.021.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mani, A. 2017. The pathogenicity of de novo rare variants, challenges and opportunities. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics 10 (6): e002013. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.117.002013.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mikwar, M., A.J. MacFarlane, and F. Marchetti. 2020. Mechanisms of oocyte aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age. Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research 785: 108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108320.

Article  Google Scholar 

Muhsin, S.M., S.Z. Arab, and A.H.B. Chin. 2023. Islamic viewpoints on opportunistic sex selection of IVF embryos upon doing preimplantation genetic testing for preventing genetic diseases. Asian Bioethics Review 16 (2): 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-023-00258-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Munné, S., B. Kaplan, J.L. Frattarelli, T. Child, G. Nakhuda, F.N. Shamma, K. Silverberg, T. Kalista, A.H. Handyside, M. Katz-Jaffe, D. Wells, T. Gordon, S. Stock-Myer, S. Willman, and the STAR Study Group. 2019. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertility and Sterility 112 (6): 1071–1079.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346.

Orvieto, R., C. Shimon, S. Rienstein, A. Jonish-Grossman, H. Shani, and A. Aizer. 2020. Do human embryos have the ability of self-correction? Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 18 (1): 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00650-8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Park, J.H., J. Faulkner, and M. Schaller. 2003. Evolved disease-avoidance processes and contemporary anti-social behavior: prejudicial attitudes and avoidance of people with physical disabilities. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27 (2): 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910408854.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pasquier, L., M. Reyneke, L. Beeckman, M. Siermann, E. Van Steijvoort, and P. Borry. 2023. Attitudes of professional stakeholders towards implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: a systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics 31 (4): 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01274-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2024. The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 122 (3): 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.013.

Ramdaney, A., L. Lichten, L. Propst, C. Mann, G.A. Lazarin, M. Jones, A. Taylor, and J. Malinowski. 2022. Expanded carrier screening in the United States: a systematic evidence review exploring client and provider experiences. Journal of Genetic Counseling 31 (4): 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1566.

Article