Jorgensen, W. L. The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science 303, 1813–1818 (2004).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Muegge, I., Bergner, A. & Kriegl, J. M. Computer-aided drug design at Boehringer Ingelheim. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 31, 275–285 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hillisch, A., Heinrich, N. & Wild, H. Computational chemistry in the pharmaceutical industry: from childhood to adolescence. ChemMedChem 10, 1958–1962 (2015).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bissantz, C., Kuhn, B. & Stahl, M. A medicinal chemist’s guide to molecular interactions. J. Med. Chem. 53, 5061–5084 (2010).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Śledź, P. & Caflisch, A. Protein structure-based drug design: from docking to molecular dynamics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 48, 93–102 (2018).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kolb, P. & Irwin, J. J. Docking screens: right for the right reasons?. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 9, 755–770 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nada, H., Meanwell, N. A. & Gabr, M. T. Virtual screening: hope, hype, and the fine line in between. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 20, 145–162 (2025).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kryshtafovych, A. et al. New prediction categories in CASP15. Proteins 91, 1550–1557 (2023).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jansen, J. M., Cornell, W., Tseng, Y. J. & Amaro, R. E. Teach–Discover–Treat (TDT): collaborative computational drug discovery for neglected diseases. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 38, 360–362 (2012).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wagner, J. R. et al. Continuous evaluation of ligand protein predictions: a weekly community challenge for drug docking. Structure 27, 1326–1335 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gathiaka, S. et al. D3R grand challenge 2015: evaluation of protein–ligand pose and affinity predictions. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 30, 651–668 (2016).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gaieb, Z. et al. D3R Grand Challenge 2: blind prediction of protein–ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 32, 1–20 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gaieb, Z. et al. D3R Grand Challenge 3: blind prediction of protein–ligand poses and affinity rankings. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 33, 1–18 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Parks, C. D. et al. D3R Grand Challenge 4: blind prediction of protein–ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 34, 99–119 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carlson, H. A. et al. CSAR 2014: a benchmark exercise using unpublished data from pharma. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56, 1063–1077 (2016).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Smith, R. D. et al. CSAR benchmark exercise 2013: evaluation of results from a combined computational protein design, docking, and scoring/ranking challenge. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56, 1022–1031 (2016).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robin, X. et al. Assessment of protein–ligand complexes in CASP15. Proteins 91, 1811–1821 (2023).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leemann, M. et al. Automated benchmarking of combined protein structure and ligand conformation prediction. Proteins 91, 1912–1924 (2023).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burley, S. K. et al. Protein Data Bank (PDB): the single global macromolecular structure archive. Methods Mol. Biol. 1607, 627–641 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Buttenschoen, M., Morris, G. M. & Deane, C. M. PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences. Chem. Sci. 15, 3130–3139 (2024).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krishna, R. et al. Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom. Science 384, eadl2528 (2024).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chai Discovery Team et al. Chai-1: decoding the molecular interactions of life. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.10.615955 (2024).

Wohlwend, J. et al. Boltz-1: democratizing biomolecular interaction modeling. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.19.624167 (2024).

Passaro, S. et al. Boltz-2: towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.14.659707 (2025).

ByteDance AML AI4Science Team et al. Protenix-advancing structure prediction through a comprehensive AlphaFold3 reproduction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.08.631967 (2025).

Qiao, Z. et al. NeuralPLexer3: physio-realistic biomolecular complex structure prediction with flow models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10743 (2024).

Kovtun, D. et al. PINDER: the protein interaction dataset and evaluation resource. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.17.603980 (2024).

Durairaj, J. et al. PLINDER: the protein–ligand interactions dataset and evaluation resource. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.17.603955 (2024).

Malhotra, S. & Karanicolas, J. When does chemical elaboration induce a ligand to change its binding mode? J. Med. Chem. 60, 128–145 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leung, S., Bodkin, M., Delft, F., Brennan, P. & Morris, G. SuCOS is better than RMSD for evaluating fragment elaboration and docking poses. Preprint at ChemRxiv https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.8100203.v1 (2019).

RDKit: open-source cheminformatics. https://www.rdkit.org

Studer, G. et al. A fully automated benchmarking suite to compare macromolecular complexes. Nat. Methods 23, 387–394 (2025).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rogers, D. & Hahn, M. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 742–754 (2010).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boby, M. L. et al. Open science discovery of potent noncovalent SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. Science 382, eabo7201 (2023).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Luttens, A. et al. Ultralarge virtual screening identifies SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors with broad-spectrum activity against coronaviruses. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 2905–2920 (2022).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central