Urzua Fresno C, Sanchez Tijmes F, Shaw KE, Huang F, Thavendiranathan P, Khullar S, Seidman MA, Hanneman K (2023) Cardiac imaging in myocarditis: current evidence and future directions. Can Assoc Radiol J. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371221119713

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Salari N, Morddarvanjoghi F, Abdolmaleki A, Rasoulpoor S, Khaleghi AA, Hezarkhani LA et al (2023) The global prevalence of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC CardiovascDisord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03231-w

Article  Google Scholar 

Marcos-Garcés V, Bertolín-Boronat C, Merenciano-González H, Martínez Mas ML, ClimentAlberola JI, López-Bueno L, Payá Rubio A, Pérez-Solé N, Ríos-Navarro C, de Dios E et al (2025) Stanicular remodeling after myocardial infarction—pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management during cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262210964

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Isaak A, Wirtz J, Kravchenko D et al (2024) Cardiac MRI in infarct-like myocarditis: transmural extension of late gadolinium enhancement is associated with worse outcomes. Insights Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01832-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fairweather DL, Beetler DJ, Musigk N, Heidecker B, Lyle MA, Cooper LT, Bruno KA (2023) Sex and gender differences in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: an update. Front Cardiovasc Med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1129348

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schulte KJ, Mayrovitz HN (2023) Myocardial infarction signs and symptoms: females vs. males. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37522

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McMechan SR, Adgey AA (1998) Age-related outcome in acute myocardial infarction: elderly people benefit from thrombolysis and should be included in trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7169.1334

Article  Google Scholar 

Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, Alakija P, Cooper LT et al (2009) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC white paper. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.007

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dali M, Kachouri R, Benameur N, Arous Y, Laabidi S (2024) Enhancing myocardial disease prediction with DOC-NET+ architecture: a custom data analysis approach for the EMIDEC challenge. Procedia Comput Sci 235:3217–3225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.304

Article  Google Scholar 

Amelotti N, Brusamolino M, Mapelli M, Contini M, Baggiano A, Fazzari F, Pontone G, Agostoni P (2024) Case report: acute myocarditis in two patients with coronary artery disease presenting with chest pain—thinking outside the box. EurHeart J Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytae220

Article  Google Scholar 

Li S, Duan X, Feng G, Sirajuddin A, Yin G, Zhuang B, He J, Xu J, Yang W, Wu W, Sun X, Zhao S, Wang H, Teng Z, Lu M (2021) Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: comparison of 2009 and 2018 Lake Louise criteria with endomyocardial biopsy confirmation. Front Cardiovasc Med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.739892

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ben Khalifa A, Mili M, Maatouk M, Ben Abdallah A, Abdellali M, Gaied S et al (2025) Deep transfer learning for classification of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI images into myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and healthy classes: comparison with subjective visual evaluation. Diagnostics 15:207. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020207

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Paciorek AM, von Schacky CE, Foreman SC et al (2024) Automated assessment of cardiac pathologies on cardiac MRI using T1-mapping and late gadolinium phase sensitive inversion recovery sequences with deep learning. BMC Med Imaging 24:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01217-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hatfaludi CA, Roșca A, Popescu AB, Chitiboi T, Sharma P, Benedek T, Itu LM (2024) Deep learning automatically distinguishes myocarditis patients from normal subjects based on MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 40:2617–2629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03284-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Di Noto T, von Spiczak J, Mannil M, Gantert E, Soda P, Manka R, Alkadhi H (2019) Radiomics for distinguishing myocardial infarction from myocarditis at late gadolinium enhancement at MRI: comparison with subjective visual analysis. RadiolCardiothorac Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2019180026

Article  Google Scholar 

Guo X, Ma R, Pang Q et al (2025) Enhancing myocarditis diagnosis through deep learning and data augmentation: a novel framework addressing imbalance and initialization sensitivity. Web Intell 23:222–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/24056456241305805

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaya K, Gietzen C, Hahnfeldt R, Zoubi M, Emrich T, Halfmann MC et al (2024) Generative pre-trained transformer 4 analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance reports in suspected myocarditis: a multicenter study. J Cardiovasc MagnReson 26:101068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101068

Hu D, Cui M, Zhang X, Wu Y, Liu Y, Zhai D, Guo W, Ju S, Fan G, Cai W (2025) Using machine learning models based on cardiac magnetic resonance parameters to predict the prognostic in children with myocarditis. BMC Pediatr 25:412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05753-y

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rahman SSM, Chen Z, Lalande A, Decourselle T, Cochet A, Pommier T et al (2023) Automatic classification of patients with myocardial infarction or myocarditis based only on clinical data: a quick response. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285165

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Baccouch W, Hasnaoui B, Benameur N, Jemai A, Lahidheb D, Labidi S (2025) Deep learning-based algorithm for the classification of left ventricle segments by hypertrophy severity. J Imaging. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11070244

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kun A, Sun Y, Yao M, Zhang J (2025) Novel loss function construction for neural network-based prediction of complex high-dimensional nonlinear dynamical systems. https://doi.org/10.15388/25-INFOR607. Informatica

Huang Z, Ye J, Wang H et al (2025) Revisiting model scaling with a U-net benchmark for 3D medical image segmentation. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15617-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mulindwa DB, Du S (2023) An n-Sigmoid activation function to improve the squeeze-and-excitation for 2D and 3D deep networks. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040911. Electronics

Qasim AN, Alani S, Mahmood SN, Mohammed SS, Aziz DA, Ata KIM (2024) Enhancing brain stroke detection: a novel deep neural network with weighted binary cross entropy training. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle. https://doi.org/10.18280/ria.380304

Article  Google Scholar 

Mora CF, Kwan AKH (2000) Sphericity, shape factor, and convexity measurement of coarse aggregate for concrete using digital image processing. Cem Concr Res 30:xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00259-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA et al (2020) The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 295(2):328–338. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191145

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dali M, Benameur N, Labidi S (2023) A new approach for native myocardial T1 mapping using a standard single-shot MRI pulse sequence technique. Procedia Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.404

Article  Google Scholar 

Ahriz A, Saouli R, Raad L, Cousty J (2025) CD-GANs: conditional dynamic training with GANs for enhanced post-gadolinium glioblastoma MRIs. MagnReson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2025.110509

Article  Google Scholar 

Chowdary GJ, Yin Z (2024) Med-Former: a transformer based architecture for medical image classification. In: Linguraru MG et al (eds) Med Image ComputComput Assist Interv – MICCAI 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15011. Springer, Cham, pp xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72120-5_42

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Xiong Z et al (2024) Multi-modality 3D CNN transformer for assisting clinical decision in intracerebral hemorrhage. In: Linguraru MG et al (eds) Med Image ComputComput Assist Interv – MICCAI 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15005. Springer, Cham, pp xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72086-4_49

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Feng J et al (2026) Cross-modal brain graph transformer via function–structure connectivity network for brain disease diagnosis. In: Gee JC et al (eds) Med Image ComputComput Assist Interv – MICCAI 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15971. Springer, Cham, pp xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05162-2_24

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Wang Z, Wu Z, Agarwal D, Sun J (2022) MedCLIP: contrastive learning from unpaired medical images and text. Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process 2022:3876–3887. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.256

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tang Y, Xiong X, Tong G et al (2024) Multimodal diagnosis model of Alzheimer’s disease based on improved transformer. Biomed Eng Online 23:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01204-4