Numerical optimization for selecting the optimal geometrical configuration of polymeric skin mesh

Choe C, et al. Human skin in vivo has a higher skin barrier function than Porcine skin ex vivo: comprehensive Raman microscopic study of the stratum corneum. J Biophotonics. 2018;11(6):e201700355.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Joodaki H, Panzer MB. Skin mechanical properties and modeling: a review. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part H: J Eng Med. 2018;232(4):323–43.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wilkinson P, Millington R. Skin (Digitally printed version ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

Google Scholar 

Mescher A. Basic histology: text and atlas. 2009.

Krause WJ. The Art of examining and interpreting histologic preparations: a laboratory manual and study guide for histology. Irvine: Universal; 2004.

Fenner J, Clark RA. Anatomy, physiology, histology, and immunohistochemistry of human skin. Skin Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2016. 1.

Brown TM, Krishnamurthy K. Histology, hair and follicle. 2018.

Cohen BJ, Hull KL. Memmler’s the human body in health and disease. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2020.

Walters KA, Roberts MS. The structure and function of skin dermatological and transdermal formulations. Hoboken: CRC; 2002:19–58.

Venus M, Waterman J, McNab I. Basic physiology of the skin. Surg. 2010;28(10):469–72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdo JM, Sopko NA, Milner SM. The applied anatomy of human skin: a model for regeneration. Wound Med. 2020;28:100179.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yousef H, Alhajj M, Sharma S. Anatomy, skin (integument), epidermis. 2017.

Kim JY, Dao H. Physiology, integument. 2020.

Evers LH, Bhavsar D, Mailänder P. The biology of burn injury. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19(9):777–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heimbach D, et al. Burn depth: a review. World J Surg. 1992;16(1):10–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jeschke MG, et al. Burn injury. Nat Rev Disease Primers. 2020;6(1):11.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Eylert G, et al. Skin regeneration is accelerated by a lower dose of multipotent mesenchymal stromal/stem cells: a paradigm change. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):1–11.

Google Scholar 

Johnson TM, Ratner D, Nelson BR. Soft tissue reconstruction with skin grafting. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27(2):151–65.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Narayan N, Shivaiah R, Kumar KM. A novel technique of collagen application over meshed split thickness graft for wound coverage. Int J Surg Med. 2021;7(4):54–54.

Google Scholar 

Arnljots B, Svedman P. Irrigation treatment in split-thickness skin grafting of intractable leg ulcers. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;19(2):211–3.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al Shlash SO, et al. Demographic characteristics and outcome of burn patients requiring skin grafts: a tertiary hospital experience. Int J Burns Trauma. 2016;6(2):30.

Google Scholar 

Horan TC, Emori TG. Definitions of key terms used in the NNIS system. Am J Infect Control. 1997;25(2):112–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yuan J, et al. Computational models for the determination of depth-dependent mechanical properties of skin with a soft, flexible measurement device. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;472(2194):p20160225.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shin SE, et al. To mesh or not to mesh: What is the ideal meshing ratio for split thickness skin grafting of the lower extremity? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2024;63(1):13–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Braza ME, Fahrenkopf MP. Split-thickness skin grafts. 2019.

Adams DC, Ramsey ML. Grafts in dermatologic surgery: review and update on full-and split‐thickness skin grafts, free cartilage grafts, and composite grafts. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1055–67.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herndon DN. Principles and practice of burn surgery. Hoboken: CRC; 2004.

Google Scholar 

Singh M, et al. Evolution of skin grafting for treatment of burns: reverdin pinch grafting to Tanner mesh grafting and beyond. Burns. 2017;43(6):1149–54.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lyons JL, Kagan RJ. The true meshing ratio of skin graft meshers. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(3):257–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sutula D, Henyš P, Čapek L. Optimal structural pattern for maximal compliance using topology optimization based on phasefields: application to improve skin graft meshing efficiency. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 2020;36(12):e3405.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gupta V, Chanda A. Biomechanics of skin grafts: effect of pattern size, spacing and orientation. Eng Res Express. 2022;4(1):015006.

Google Scholar 

Gupta V, Singh G, Chanda A. High expansion auxetic skin graft simulants for severe burn injury mitigation. Eur Burn J. 2023;4(1):108–20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khayami M, Rassoli A, Feizkhah A. Optimal geometrical selection of skin mesh: experimental analysis and numerical optimization. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):21263.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast Phys Sci Solids. 2000;61:1–48.

Google Scholar 

Holzapfel GA, et al. Large strain analysis of soft biological membranes: formulation and finite element analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1996;132(1–2):45–61.

Article  Google Scholar 

He H, et al. A comparative study of 85 hyperelastic constitutive models for both unfilled rubber and highly filled rubber nanocomposite material. Nano Mater Sci. 2022;4(2):64–82.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Rivlin RS. Some applications of elasticity theory to rubber engineering. Collected papers of RS rivlin: volume I and II. Springer. 1997: 9–16.

Horgan CO, Saccomandi G. A molecular-statistical basis for the Gent constitutive model of rubber elasticity. J Elast. 2002;68(1):167–76.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yeoh OH. Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol. 1993;66(5):754–71.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ali A, Hosseini M, Sahari BB. A review of constitutive models for rubber-like materials. Am J Eng Appl Sci. 2010;3(1):232–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barnes LA, et al. Mechanical forces in cutaneous wound healing: emerging therapies to minimize Scar formation. Adv Wound Care. 2018;7(2):47–56.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pensalfini M, Tepole AB. Mechano-biological and bio-mechanical pathways in cutaneous wound healing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023;19(3):e1010902.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Evans ND, et al. Epithelial mechanobiology, skin wound healing, and the stem cell niche. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;28:397–409.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vainieri ML, et al. Mechanical stress inhibits early stages of endogenous cell migration: a pilot study in an ex vivo osteochondral model. Polymers. 2020;12(8):1754.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liang X, et al. Mechanical stretching promotes skin tissue regeneration via enhancing mesenchymal stem cell homing and transdifferentiation. Stem Cells Translat Med. 2016;5(7):960–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif