Inclusion of intracranial volume as a covariate feature improves MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease classification

Yang K, Mohammed EAJapa (2020) A review of artificial intelligence technologies for early prediction of Alzheimer’s disease. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.01781. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.01781

Hechkel W, Helali AJAoCMiE (2025) Unveiling Alzheimer’s disease early: a comprehensive review of machine learning and imaging techniques. Arch Comput Methods Eng 32(1):471–484

Article  Google Scholar 

Eskildsen SF, Coupé P, Fonov VS, Pruessner JC, Collins DL (2015) aging AsDNIJNo. Struct Imag Biomark Alzheimer’s Dis Predict Dis Progr 36:S23–S31

Google Scholar 

Frisoni GB, Fox NC, Jack CR Jr, Scheltens P, Thompson PMJNrn (2010) The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 6(2):67–77

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, Henley SM, Lehmann M, Hobbs N, Clarkson MJ, MacManus DG, Ourselin S, Fox NCJN (2010) Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? Neuroimage 53(4):1244–1255

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Brien LM, Ziegler DA, Deutsch CK, Frazier JA, Herbert MR, Locascio JJJPRN (2011) Statistical adjustments for brain size in volumetric neuroimaging studies: some practical implications in methods. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 193(2):113–122

Article  Google Scholar 

Voevodskaya O, Simmons A, Nordenskjöld R, Kullberg J, Ahlström H, Lind L, Wahlund L-O, Larsson E-M, Westman E (2014) The effects of intracranial volume adjustment approaches on multiple regional MRI volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 6:264

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu D, Johnson HJ, Long JD, Magnotta VA, Paulsen JSJFin (2014) The power-proportion method for intracranial volume correction in volumetric imaging analysis. Front Neurosci 8:356

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sanfilipo MP, Benedict RH, Zivadinov R, Bakshi RJN (2004) Correction for intracranial volume in analysis of whole brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: the proportion vs. residual method. Neuroimage 22(4):1732–1743

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mathalon DH, Sullivan EV, Rawles JM, Pfefferbaum AJPRN (1993) Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 50(2):121–139

Article  Google Scholar 

Greenberg DL, Messer DF, Payne ME, MacFall JR, Provenzale JM, Steffens DC, Krishnan RRJNoa (2008) Aging, gender, and the elderly adult brain: an examination of analytical strategies. Neurobiol Aging 29(2):290–302

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miller GA, Chapman JPJJoap (2001) Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J Abnormal Psychol 110(1):40

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Hill‐Jarrett T, Buto P, Pederson A, Sims KD, Zimmerman SC, DeVost MA, Ferguson E, Lacar B, Yang YJHBM (2024) Comparison of approaches to control for intracranial volume in research on the association of brain volumes with cognitive outcomes. Hum Brain Mapp 45(4):e26633

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nordenskjöld R, Malmberg F, Larsson E-M, Simmons A, Ahlström H, Johansson L, Kullberg JJPRN (2015) Intracranial volume normalization methods: considerations when investigating gender differences in regional brain volume. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 231(3):227–235

Article  Google Scholar 

Dhamala E, Ooi LQR, Chen J, Kong R, Anderson KM, Chin R, Yeo BT, Holmes AJJN (2022) Proportional intracranial volume correction differentially biases behavioral predictions across neuroanatomical features, sexes, and development. Neuroimage 260:119485

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kumari R, Das S, Nigam A, Singh RKJMT (2025) Multimodal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on volumetric and cognitive assessments. Multimed Tools Appl 84(17):18223–18246

Article  Google Scholar 

Hansen TI, Brezova V, Eikenes L, Håberg A, Vangberg TRJAJoN (2015) How does the accuracy of intracranial volume measurements affect normalized brain volumes? Sample size estimates based on 966 subjects from the HUNT MRI cohort. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(8):1450–1456

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nerland S, Stokkan TS, Jørgensen KN, Wortinger LA, Richard G, Beck D, van Der Meer D, Westlye LT, Andreassen OA, Agartz IJHbm (2022) A comparison of intracranial volume estimation methods and their cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations with age. Hum Brain Mapp 43(15):4620–4639

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pellegrini E, Ballerini L, Hernandez MdCV, Chappell FM, González-Castro V, Anblagan D, Danso S, Muñoz-Maniega S, Job D, Pernet CJAs (2018) Machine learning of neuroimaging for assisted diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review. Alzheimer’s Dement Diag Assess Dis Monit 10:519–535

Article  Google Scholar 

Saoud LS, AlMarzouqi H (2024) Explainable early detection of Alzheimer’s disease using ROIs and an ensemble of 138 3D vision transformers. Scientific Reports 14(1):27756

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jo T, Nho K, Saykin AJJFian (2019) Deep learning in Alzheimer’s disease: diagnostic classification and prognostic prediction using neuroimaging data. Front Aging Neurosci 11:220

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mueller SG, Weiner MW, Thal LJ, Petersen RC, Jack C, Jagust W, Trojanowski JQ, Toga AW, Beckett LJNC (2005) The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Neuroimag Clin 15(4):869–877

Article  Google Scholar 

Malone IB, Cash D, Ridgway GR, MacManus DG, Ourselin S, Fox NC, Schott JMJN (2013) MIRIAD—Public release of a multiple time point Alzheimer’s MR imaging dataset. Neuroimage 70:33–36

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, YushkevichGee PAJCJItomi (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Transac Med Imag 29(6):1310–1320

Article  Google Scholar 

Fischl B (2012) FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62(2):774–781

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alexander B, Loh WY, Matthews LG, Murray AL, Adamson C, Beare R, Chen J, Kelly CE, Anderson PJ, Doyle LWJFiN (2019) Desikan-Killiany-Tourville atlas compatible version of M-CRIB neonatal parcellated whole brain atlas: The M-CRIB 20. Front Neurosci 13:34

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Iscan Z, Jin TB, Kendrick A, Szeglin B, Lu H, Trivedi M, Fava M, McGrath PJ, Weissman M, Kurian BTJHbm (2015) Test–retest reliability of freesurfer measurements within and between sites: effects of visual approval process. Hum Brain Map 36(9):3472–3485

Article  Google Scholar 

Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine learning 45(1):5–32

Google Scholar 

Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’16):785–794

Fisher A, Rudin C, Dominici FJJoMLR (2019) All models are wrong, but many are useful: learning a variable’s importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously. J Mach Learn Res 20(177):1–81

Google Scholar 

Lundberg SM, Lee SI (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30

Cox DRJJotRSSSBSM (1958) The regression analysis of binary sequences. J R Stat Soc Ser B 20(2):215–232

Article  Google Scholar 

Cortes C, Vapnik VJMl (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

Article  Google Scholar 

Demšar JJJoMlr (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30

Google Scholar 

Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJJn (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088):533–536

Article  Google Scholar 

He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition:770–778

Van Loenhoud AC, Groot C, Vogel JW, Van Der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele RJAsr (2018) Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? Alzheimer’s Res Ther 10(1):91

Article  Google Scholar 

de Rooij SR, Caan MW, Swaab DF, Nederveen AJ, Majoie CB, Schwab M, Painter RC, Roseboom TJJB (2016) Prenatal famine exposure has sex-specific effects on brain size. 139 8:2136–2142

Google Scholar 

DeCarli C, Maillard P, Pase MP, Beiser AS, Kojis D, Satizabal CL, Himali JJ, Aparicio HJ, Fletcher E, Seshadri SJJn (2024) Trends in intracranial and cerebral volumes of Framingham heart study participants born 1930 to 1970. JAMA Neurol 81(5):471–480

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Henschel L, Conjeti S, Estrada S, Diers K, Fischl B, Reuter MJN (2020) Fastsurfer-a fast and accurate deep learning based neuroimaging pipeline. Neuroimage 219:117012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Klasson N, Olsson E, Eckerström C, Malmgren H, Wallin AJERE (2018) Estimated intracranial volume from FreeSurfer is biased by total brain volume. Eur Radiol Exp 2(1):24

Article  PubMed Central 

Comments (0)

No login
gif