Callens N, De Cuypere G, De Sutter P, Monstrey S, Weyers S, Hoebeke P, et al. An update on surgical and non-surgical treatments for vaginal hypoplasia. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):775–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu024.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Edmonds DK, Rose GL, Lipton MG, Quek J. Mayer-rokitansky-küster-hauser syndrome: a review of 245 consecutive cases managed by a multidisciplinary approach with vaginal dilators. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(3):686–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.038.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Routh JC, Laufer MR, Cannon GM Jr., Diamond DA, Gargollo PC. Management strategies for Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser related vaginal agenesis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Urol. 2010;184(5):2116–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.133.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 728 summary: müllerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):196–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002452.

Article  Google Scholar 

Goldwyn RM. History of attempts to form a vagina. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59(3):319–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197703000-00002.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Banister JB, McIndoe AH. Congenital absence of the vagina, treated by means of an indwelling Skin-Graft. Proc R Soc Med. 1938;31(9):1055–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/003591573803100916.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li FY, Xu YS, Zhou CD, Zhou Y, Li SK, Li Q. Long-term outcomes of vaginoplasty with autologous buccal micromucosa. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):951–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000161.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Leeuwen K, Baker L, Grimsby G. Autologous buccal mucosa graft for primary and secondary reconstruction of vaginal anomalies. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019;28(5):150843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2019.150843.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anagani M, Agrawal P, Meka K, Narayana RT, Bandameedipally R. Novel minimally invasive technique of neovaginoplasty using an absorbable adhesion barrier. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(1):206–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.025.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Motoyama S, Laoag-Fernandez JB, Mochizuki S, Yamabe S, Maruo T. Vaginoplasty with interceed absorbable adhesion barrier for complete squamous epithelialization in vaginal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(5):1260–4. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.317.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Avsar AF, Tas EE, Keskin HL, Yeğin GF. Vaginoplasty using human amniotic membranes A report of five patients. J Reprod Med. 2016;61(9–10):483–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gari A, Baradwan S, Iskandarani R, Alkhiary AY, Abumohssin A, Abu-Zaid A. Creation of neovagina in women with müllerian agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome) using fresh human Amnion. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024;67(6):541–9. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.24114.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rall K, Schickner MC, Barresi G, Schönfisch B, Wallwiener M, Wallwiener CW, et al. Laparoscopically assisted neovaginoplasty in vaginal agenesis: a long-term outcome study in 240 patients. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27(6):379–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Borruto F, Camoglio FS, Zampieri N, Fedele L. The laparoscopic Vecchietti technique for vaginal agenesis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;98(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.03.012.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nahas S, Yi J, Magrina J. Mayo clinic experience with modified Vecchietti procedure for vaginal agenesis: it is easy, safe, and effective. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(5):553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.026.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Purushothaman V. Horse shoe flap vaginoplasty–a new technique of vaginal reconstruction with labia minora flaps for primary vaginal agenesis. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(7):934–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.04.013.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hwang WY, Chang TS, Sun P, Chung TH. Vaginal reconstruction using labia minora flaps in congenital total absence. Ann Plast Surg. 1985;15(6):534–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198512000-00013.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martinez-Mora J, Isnard R, Castellvi A, López Ortiz P. Neovagina in vaginal agenesis: surgical methods and long-term results. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(1):10–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(92)90093-m.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cao L, Wang Y, Li Y, Xu H. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty with laparoscopic sigmoid vaginoplasty for treating congenital vaginal agenesis. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1173–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1991-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karateke A, Gurbuz A, Kabaca C, Mengulluoglu M. Sacrocervicopexy and combined operations involving cases of total uterine prolapse. Med Princ Pract. 2004;13(3):164–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000076957.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Labus LD, Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic DS, Bizic MR, Stojanovic BZ, Cavic TM. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes. Sex Health. 2011;8(3):427–30. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh10105.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang R, Su Q, Yan Z. Excising the neovagina due to introital atresia and closed neovaginal loop after sigmoid vaginoplasty: a case report. Medicine. 2021;100(9):e24972. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000024972.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Delshad S, Delshad B, Mogheimi P. Postoperative outcomes of sigmoid colon vaginoplasty for vaginal agenesis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Med Surg. 2022;78:103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103833.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bogliolo S, Gaggero CR, Nadalini C, Iacobone AD, Musacchi V, Cassani C, et al. Long-term risk of malignancy in the neovagina created using colon graft in vaginal agenesis - a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(5):543–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2014.987112.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang X, Liang J, Li W, Chen B, Sun X, Xie Z. Modified Vecchietti vaginoplasty using self-made single-port laparoscopy in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(1):266–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.10.001.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El Saman AM, Abou-Taleb H, Khalaf M, Salama MH, Habib DM, Bahlol M, et al. Transumbilical vaginoplasty through fractionated miniports: a sutureless procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(1):44–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003307.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sueters J, Groenman FA, Bouman MB, Roovers JPW, de Vries R, Smit TH, et al. Tissue engineering neovagina for vaginoplasty in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and gender dysphoria patients: a systematic review. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2023;29(1):28–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0067.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amies Oelschlager AM, Debiec K. Vaginal dilator therapy: a guide for providers for assessing readiness and supporting patients through the process successfully. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(4):354–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2019.05.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang W, Chen F, Cheng J, Peng S, Ye H. Effects of different vaginal mould use approaches after vaginoplasty with artificial dermis in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(2):300060521990519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060521990519.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herlin M, Bay Bjørn AM, Jørgensen LK, Trolle B, Petersen MB. Treatment of vaginal agenesis in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in Denmark: a nationwide comparative study of anatomical outcome and complications. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):746–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.015.

Article  PubMed