Semin intervent Radiol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809958

Jason Liu

1   Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University School of Medicine and Science, Chicago, Illinois

,

Asher Mir

1   Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University School of Medicine and Science, Chicago, Illinois

,

Michael Lee

1   Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University School of Medicine and Science, Chicago, Illinois

,

Shamit S. Desai

2   Department of Interventional Radiology, UChicago Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

› Author Affiliations › Further InformationAlso available at   Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Stents have a wide array of clinical uses in maintaining luminal patency for vascular and nonvascular systems, including biliary, gastrointestinal, and tracheobronchial systems. Bare metal stents (BMS) are used in many interventional radiology applications.

Improvements in BMS technology offer different advantages in terms of flexibility, radial force, and adaptability. The aim of this study is to provide a back-to-the-basics overview of BMS while looking at its advantages, limitations, and applications.

Article published online:
02 July 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

  References 1 Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). Rev Esp Cardiol Engl Ed. Accessed November 4, 2024 at: https://www.revespcardiol.org/en-a-brief-history-of-coronary-artery-stent-articulo-S1885585717305881-pdf 2 Thukkani AK, Kinlay S. Endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease. Circ Res 2015; 116 (09) 1599-1613 3 Kessel D, Robertson I. Interventional Radiology: A Survival Guide. 4th ed.. Elsevier; 2017 4 Ho MY, Chen CC, Wang CY. et al. The development of coronary artery stents: from bare-metal to bio-resorbable types. Metals (Basel) 2016; 6 (07) 168 5 Kapoor BS, Mauri G, Lorenz JM. Management of biliary strictures: state-of-the-art review. Radiology 2018; 289 (03) 590-603 6 Jeong SJ, Lee J. Management of gastric outlet obstruction: focusing on endoscopic approach. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2020; 11 (02) 8-16 7 Duerig TW, Wholey M. A comparison of balloon- and self-expanding stents. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2002; 11 (04) 173-178 8 Garcia-Villen F, López-Zárraga F, Viseras C. et al. Three-dimensional printing as a cutting-edge, versatile and personalizable vascular stent manufacturing procedure: toward tailor-made medical devices. Int J Bioprint 2023; 9 (02) 664 9 Gibson K. . Iliac vein stenting: best practices for patient safety and successful outcomes. Endovascular Today. Available at: https://evtoday.com/articles/2021-july/iliac-vein-stenting-best-practices-for-patient-safety-and-successful-outcomes . Accessed March 4, 2025 10 Pacheco KA. Allergy to surgical implants. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2019; 56 (01) 72-85 11 Chen Y, Gao P, Huang L. et al. A tough nitric oxide-eluting hydrogel coating suppresses neointimal hyperplasia on vascular stent. Nat Commun 2021; 12 (01) 7079 12 Musick KM, Coffey AC, Irazoqui PP. Sensor to detect endothelialization on an active coronary stent. Biomed Eng Online 2010; 9: 67 13 Vishnu J, Manivasagam G. Perspectives on smart stents with sensors: from conventional permanent to novel bioabsorbable smart stent technologies. Med Devices Sens 2020; 3 (06) e10116 14 Liu M, Hou M, Wu Q, Zhang C. 131I radioactive self-expandable metallic stents for the therapy of malignant biliary obstruction. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021; 1133 (01) 012002 15 Shamimi-Noori SM, Clark TWI. Venous stents: current status and future directions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 21 (02) 113-116 16 Forrestal B, Case BC, Yerasi C, Musallam A, Chezar-Azerrad C, Waksman R. Bioresorbable scaffolds: current technology and future perspectives. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2020; 11 (02) e0016