AACTE. (2010). Teachers for the 21st Century. Education, September, 1–40. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-for-the-21st-century_9789264193864-en

Alam, A. (2022). Educational Robotics and Computer Programming in Early Childhood Education: A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Elementary School Students’ Computational Thinking for Designing Powerful Educational Scenarios. 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing, ICSTSN 2022, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTSN53084.2022.9761354

Alnajjar, F., Bartneck, C., Baxter, P., Belpaeme, T., Cappuccio, M. L., Di Dio, C., Eyssel, F., Handke, J., Mubin, O., Obaid, M., & Reich-Stiebert, N. (2021). Robots in education: An introduction to high-tech social agents, intelligent tutors, and curricular tools. In Robots in Education: An Introduction to High-Tech Social Agents, Intelligent Tutors, and Curricular Tools (Number July 2022). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142706

Alves Gomes, A. S., Da Silva, J. F., & De Lima Teixeira, L. R. (2020). Educational Robotics in Times of Pandemic: Challenges and Possibilities. 2020 Latin American Robotics Symposium, 2020 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics and 2020 Workshop on Robotics in Education, LARS-SBR-WRE 2020, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE51543.2020.9307145

Article  Google Scholar 

Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 9(2), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223

Article  Google Scholar 

Aroca, R. V., Pazelli, T. F., Tonidandel, F., Filho, A. C. A., Simes, A. S., Colombini, E. L., Burlamaqui, A. M. F., & Goncalves, L. M. G. (2016). Brazilian Robotics Olympiad: A successful paradigm for science and technology dissemination. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 13(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881416658166

Article  Google Scholar 

Barone, T., & Bresler, L. (2000). Collaborative Creativity in STEAM: Narratives of Art Education Students’ Experiences in Transdisciplinary Spaces. In International Journal of Education and the Arts (Vol. 15, Number 1, p. 71). https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X0001500110

Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of Making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380

Article  Google Scholar 

Blikstein, P. (2014). Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education. FabLab, September, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839423820.203

Boice, K. L., Jackson, J. R., Alemdar, M., Rao, A. E., Grossman, S., & Usselman, M. (2021). Supporting teachers on their STEAM journey: A collaborative STEAM teacher training program. Education Sciences, 11(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030105

Article  Google Scholar 

Budiyanto, C. W., Shahbodin, F., Umam, M. U. K., Isnaini, R., Rahmawati, A., & Widiastuti, I. (2021). Developing Computational Thinking Ability in Early Childhood Education: The Influence of Programming-toy on Parent-Children Engagement. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v5i1.44397

Catlin, D., & Woollard, J. (2014). Educational Robots and Computational Thinking. Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, 144–151.

Chen, S., & Ding, Y. (2024). Advancing STEAM education: a comprehensive assessment of competence. Journal of Computers in Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00322-1

Coşkunserçe, O. (2021). Implementing teacher-centered robotics activities in science lessons: The effect on motivation, satisfaction and science skills. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021067231

Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311

Article  Google Scholar 

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.

Google Scholar 

Dobrosovestnova, A. (2019). Masterarbeit / master’s thesis.

Elicker, A. T., Barbosa, D., & Martins, D. R. L. (2022). Creative Approach as a Teaching Proposal to Develop the Digital Literacy. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 10(6), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss6.3779

Evripidou, S., Georgiou, K., tsidis, L., Amanatiadis, A. A., Zinonos, Z., & Chatzichristofis, S. A. (2020). Educational Robotics: Platforms, Competitions and Expected Learning Outcomes. IEEE Access, 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042555

García, C. (2016). Project-based Learning in Virtual Groups - Collaboration and Learning Outcomes in a Virtual Training Course for Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228(June), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.015

Article  Google Scholar 

Gibeault, S., Iorio, J. D., Santillan, J. D., Shen, H., & Tufenkjian, M. (2019). Practical application of robotics competition for STEM education. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33181

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Article  Google Scholar 

Gubenko, A., Kirsch, C., Smilek, J. N., Lubart, T., & Houssemand, C. (2021). Educational Robotics and Robot Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8(June), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.662030

Article  Google Scholar 

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Citation: American Journal of Physics, 66, 64. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers and Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005

Article  Google Scholar 

Land, M. (2019). The Importance of Integrating the Arts into STEM Curriculum (pp. 11–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25101-7_2

López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., & Parra-González, M. E. (2021). Robotics in education: A scientific mapping of the literature in web of science. Electronics (Switzerland), 10(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030291

Article  Google Scholar 

Muniandy, T., Sharif, S., & Mariappan, M. (2022). The Effect of Robotics Program on Students Attitude Towards Science. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(4), e001422. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i4.1422

Nascimento, L., Souto, D., Do Nascimento, T., Albuquerque, E., Sa, S., & Goncalves, L. M. (2019). SBotics: Simulation applied for the practical component of the brazilian robotics olympiad. Proceedings - 2019 Latin American Robotics Symposium, 2019 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics and 2019 Workshop on Robotics in Education, LARS/SBR/WRE 2019, 487–491. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00092

Article  Google Scholar 

Papert, S. (1973). Uses of Technology to Enhance Education. 298.

Patel, J. (2018). The Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Integration of STEM Education Jessica Patel McGill University. Constructivist Approach.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in childrenWhen Thinkings Begins. In The origins of intelligence in children (pp. 25–36). International University Press.

Pont, B., & Montt, G. (2021). Education Policy Outlook: Brazil – With a Focus on National and Subnational Policies. Oecd, June. https://www.oecd.org/education/policy-outlook/country-profile-France-2020.pdf

Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the Joy in the Unknown”: Implementation of STEAM Teaching Practices in Middle School Science and Math Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201

Article  Google Scholar 

Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., King, E., & Plank, H. (2020). STEAM Designed and Enacted: Understanding the Process of Design and Implementation of STEAM Curriculum in an Elementary School. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09832-w

Article  Google Scholar 

Roth, T., Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2022). Testing Creativity and Personality to Explore Creative Potentials in the Science Classroom. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10005-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharif, S., Muniandy, T., & Mariappan, M. (2023). Exploring the impact of robotics program in enhancing students`attitude towards science. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 8(51), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.851004

Soares, I. de O. (2018). Educommunication , an indispensable paradigm for curriculum structure renewal in Brazilian elementary education 1. Comunicação & Educação, 1, 7–24.

Souza, I. M. L., Andrade, W. L., & Sampaio, L. M. R. (2022). Educational Robotics Applications for the Development of Computational Thinking in a Brazilian Technical and Vocational High School. Informatics in Education, 21(1), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.06

Sung, J., Lee, J. Y., & Chun, H. Y. (2023). Short-term effects of a classroom-based STEAM program using robotic kits on children in South Korea. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00417-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

Timbane, S. A. A., & Literature, I. P. (2019). The Importance of the Use of Technological Tools in the Sesi Senai Catalão The Importance of the Use of Technological Tools in the Sesi Senai Catalão Schools-Brazil Alexandre Antonio Timbane , Phd In Portuguese Literature. February. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0901030109

Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M., Jolm-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1978).Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Yung, B. H. W., & Tao, P. K. (2004). Advancing pupils within the motivational zone of proximal development: A case study in science teaching. Research in Science Education, 34(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-0286-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhou, Y., Jiang, Z., Chiang, F. K., & Leng, C. (2024). Impact of School-Enterprise Cooperative Informal STEM Learning on the STEM Career Intention of Female High School Students. Research in Science Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10205-1