ISAPS Survey on Aesthetic/ Cosmetic procedures performed in 2023. Available on: https://www.isaps.org/media/rxnfqibn/isaps-global-survey_2023.pdf. Accessed 16.11.2024.

Thadikonda K, Zhang R, Bruhn J, Nguyen PD, Poore SO. Informed consent practices in global surgery among plastic surgery organizations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(4):921–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009561. Epub 2022 Aug 8. PMID: 35939636.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basta MN, Rao V, Paiva M, Liu PY, Woo AS, Fischer JP, Breuing KH. Evaluating the Inaccuracy of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surgical Risk Calculator in Plastic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Short-Term Predicted Complications. Ann Plast Surg. 2022;88(3 Suppl 3):S219-S223. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003189. PMID: 35513323.

Chen B, Sheng W, Wu Z, Ma B, Cao N, Li X, Yang J, Yuan X, Yan L, Zhu G, Zhou Y, Huang Z, Zhu M, Ding X, Du H, Wan Y, Gao X, Cheng X, Xu P, Zhang T, Tao K, Shuai X, Cheng P, Gao Y, Zhang J. Machine learning based peri-surgical risk calculator for abdominal related emergency general surgery: a multicenter retrospective study. Int J Surg. 2024;110(6):3527–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001276. PMID: 38489557; PMCID: PMC11175782.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator. Ann Surg. 2018;268(4):574–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002956. PMID: 30124479.

Chan DXH, Sim YE, Chan YH, Poopalalingam R, Abdullah HR. Development of the combined assessment of risk encountered in surgery (CARES) surgical risk calculator for prediction of postsurgical mortality and need for intensive care unit admission risk: a single-center retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e019427. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019427. PMID: 29574442; PMCID: PMC5875658.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833– 42.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385. Epub 2013 Sep 18. PMID: 24055383; PMCID: PMC3805776.

Höhn P, Runde F, Luu AM, Fahlbusch T, Fein D, Klinger C, Uhl W, Belyaev O; members of StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV);, Keck T, Werner J, Nüssler N, Bartsch DK, Germer CT, Friess H, Mönch C, Oldhafer KJ, Kalff JC. Applicability of the surgical risk calculator by the American College of Surgeons in the setting of German patients undergoing complete pancreatectomy: multicentre study using data from the StuDoQ|Pancreas registry. BJS Open. 2023;7(2):zrac164. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac164. PMID: 36882081; PMCID: PMC9991503.

Campagnaro T, Poletto E, Tarchi P, Rattizzato S, Verlato G, Conci S, Pedrazzani C, De Manzini N, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A. Evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal Cancer undergoing liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(10):2114–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05784-9. Epub 2023 Aug 14. PMID: 37580490; PMCID: PMC10579123.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Massoumi RL, Trevino CM, Webb TP. Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Comparison to the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator and the Tokyo Guidelines. World J Surg. 2017;41(4):935–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3816-3. PMID: 27834012.

Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Sr. Evaluating Discrimination of Risk Prediction Models: The C Statistic. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1063-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.11082. PMID: 26348755.

Brier. Verification of forecast expressed in terms of probability. Mon Weather Rev. 1950;78(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bose S, Talmor D. Who is a high-risk surgical patient? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24(6):547–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000556. PMID: 30308542.

Huckaby LV, Dadashzadeh ER, Li S, Campwala I, Gabriel L, Sperry J, Handzel RM, Forsythe R, Brown J. Accuracy of risk Estimation for surgeons versus risk calculators in emergency general surgery. J Surg Res. 2022;278:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.042. Epub 2022 May 17. PMID: 35594615; PMCID: PMC10024255.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Perrault DP, Rochlin DH, Gillenwater TJ, Karanas YL, Sheckter CC. The Impact of Plastic Surgery Volume on Inpatient Burn Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(6):1001e-1006e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008573. PMID: 34847127.

Grady D, Berkowitz SA. Why is a good clinical prediction rule so hard to find? Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(19):1701-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.482. PMID: 22025427.

Goodwin et al. March. A meta-analysis of the American college of surgeons risk calculator’s predictive accuracy among different surgical sub-specialties. Surgery in Practice and Science. 2024; (16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238

Sahara K, Paredes AZ, Merath K, Tsilimigras DI, Bagante F, Ratti F, Marques HP, Soubrane O, Beal EW, Lam V, Poultsides GA, Popescu I, Alexandrescu S, Martel G, Aklile W, Guglielmi A, Hugh T, Aldrighetti L, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(3):551–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04174-4. Epub 2019 Apr 1. PMID: 30937717.

Hamade S, Alshiek J, Javadian P, Ahmed S, McLeod FN, Shobeiri SA. Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator to predict outcomes after hysterectomies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;158(3):714–721. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14075. Epub 2022 Jan 12. PMID: 34929052.

Rivard C, Nahum R, Slagle E, Duininck M, Isaksson Vogel R, Teoh D. Evaluation of the performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141(2):281–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 24. PMID: 26899020; PMCID: PMC5179222.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blair BM, Lehman EB, Jafri SM, Kaag MG, Raman JD. Predicted versus observed 30-day perioperative outcomes using the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(7):1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1898-6. Epub 2018 Jun 4. PMID: 29868938.

Golan S, Adamsky MA, Johnson SC, Barashi NS, Smith ZL, Rodriguez MV, Liao C, Smith ND, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL. National surgical quality improvement program surgical risk calculator poorly predicts complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Urol Oncol. 2018;36(2):77..e1-77.e7. Epub 2017 Oct 13. PMID: 29033195.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lima RZ. The future of medicine– what to expect in 2025 for CPT. Health. December 17, 2024. Available online: https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/cpt-updates-2025. Accessed 14.04.2025.

Herman CK, Hoschander AS, Wong A. Post-Bariatric body contouring. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35(6):672–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv008. Epub 2015 Apr 22. PMID: 25902949.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dhatariya KK, Li P, Wah-Pun Sin E, Cheng JOS, Li FYN, Yue AWY, Gooday C, Nunney I. The impact of glycaemic variability on wound healing in the diabetic foot - A retrospective study of new ulcers presenting to a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;135:23–9. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PMID: 29097286.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar