Association of self-efficacy, risk attitudes, and time preferences with health-related quality of life and functioning after total hip or knee replacement – Results of the MobilE-TRA 2 cohort

Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). The 20 most frequent surgeries of full inpatient hospital patients together. Federal Ministry of the Interior (Germany); 2021. Retrieved 10.07.2023. Available from: https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Health/Hospitals/Tables/drg-surgeries-together.html.

Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–19.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, Mont MA. Hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2012;380(9855):1768–77.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(6):568–78.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DWC, Suarez-Almazor ME. The Effect of Age on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(3):454–60.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hofstede SN, Gademan MG, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG, Marang-Van Mheen PJ, De. Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):1–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chiung-Jui SuD, Yuan K-S, Weng S-F, Hong R-B, Wu M-P, Wu H-M, et al. Can Early Rehabilitation after Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce Its Major Complications and Medical Expenses? Report from a Nationally Representative Cohort. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:641958.

Google Scholar 

den Hertog A, Gliesche K, Timm J, Mühlbauer B, Zebrowski S. Pathway-controlled fast-track rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective clinical study evaluating the recovery pattern, drug consumption, and length of stay. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(8):1153–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jette DU, Hunter SJ, Burkett L, Langham B, Logerstedt DS, Piuzzi NS, et al. Physical Therapist Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2020;100(9):1603–31.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lenguerrand E, Artz N, Marques E, Sanderson E, Lewis K, Murray J, et al. Effect of group-based outpatient physical therapy on function after total knee replacement: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(6):768–77.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pisters MF, Veenhof C, Schellevis FG, Twisk JW, Dekker J, De Bakker DH. Exercise adherence improving long-term patient outcome in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(8):1087–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Grossman M. On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health. J Polit Econ. 1972;80(2):223–55.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mogler BK, Shu SB, Fox CR, Goldstein NJ, Victor RG, Escarce JJ, et al. Using Insights From Behavioral Economics and Social Psychology to Help Patients Manage Chronic Diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(5):711–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ogaki M, Tanaka SC. What Is Behavioral Economics? Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017. p. 3-22.

Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I: World Scientific; 1979. p. 99-127.

Thaler RH, Shefrin HM. An economic theory of self-control. J Polit Econ. 1981;89(2):392–406.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holman HR, Lorig K. Perceived self-efficacy in self-management of chronic disease. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC, US: Hemisphere Publishing Corp; 1992. p. 305-23.

Anderson LR, Mellor JM. Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference. J Health Econ. 2008;27(5):1260–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bradford WD. The association between individual time preferences and health maintenance habits. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(1):99–112.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2011;9(3):522–50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brembo EA, Kapstad H, Van Dulmen S, Eide H. Role of self-efficacy and social support in short-term recovery after total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Out. 2017;15(1):68.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hartley SM, Vance DE, Elliott TR, Cuckler JM, Berry JW. Hope, self-efficacy, and functional recovery after knee and hip replacement surgery. Rehabil Psychol. 2008;53(4):521.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cooke M, Walker R, Aitken LM, Freeman A, Pavey S, Cantrill R. Pre-operative self-efficacy education vs. Usual care for patients undergoing joint replacement surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(1):74–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Der Pol M, Hennessy D, Manns B. The role of time and risk preferences in adherence to physician advice on health behavior change. Eur J Health Econ. 2017;18(3):373–86.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kosteas VD. Physical activity and time preference. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015;15(4):361–86.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leonard T, Shuval K, De Oliveira A, Skinner CS, Eckel C, Murdoch JC. Health behavior and behavioral economics: economic preferences and physical activity stages of change in a low-income African-American community. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27(4):211–21.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Katzenberger B, Schwettmann L, Weigl M, Paulus A, Pedron S, Fuchs S, et al. Behavioural and patient-individual determinants of quality of life, functioning and physical activity in older adults (MobilE-TRA 2): study protocol of an observational cohort study in a tertiary care setting. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e051915.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Katzenberger B, Fuchs S, Schwettmann L, Strobl R, Hauser A, Koller D, et al. Association of self-efficacy, risk attitudes, and time preferences with functioning in older patients with vertigo, dizziness, and balance disorders in a tertiary care setting—Results from the MobilE-TRA2 cohort. Front Neurol. 2023;14.

Conner-Spady BL, Marshall DA, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Noseworthy TW. Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1311–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai J-S, Terluin B, Cella D, et al. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:2729–54.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vandenbrouckel JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):1628–55.

Google Scholar 

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie e. V. S3-Leitlinie: Evidenz-und konsensbasierte Indikationskriterien zur Hüfttotalendoprothese bei Coxarthrose (EKIT-Hüfte). AWMF online; 2021.

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie e. V. S2k-Leitlinie Indikation Knieendoprothese. AWMF online; 2023.

Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ludwig K, von der Schulenburg JMG, Greiner W. German value set for the EQ-5D-5L. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(6):663–74.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gutacker N, Street A. Use of large-scale HRQoL datasets to generate individualised predictions and inform patients about the likely benefit of surgery. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:2497–505.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988.

Stucki G, Meier D, Stucki S, Michel B, Tyndall A, Dick W, et al. Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) arthrosis index. Z Rheumatol. 1996;55(1):40–9.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bellamy N. WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a user’s guide. London: Ontario; 1995.

Google Scholar 

Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA. Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(2):72.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. 2001;45(4):384–91.

Article  CAS 

Comments (0)

No login
gif