Augmented reality-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Konan S, Duncan CP. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with neuromuscular imbalance. Bone Joint J. 2018;100B(1 Supple A):17–21.

Article  Google Scholar 

D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(3):315–21.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Murayama T, Ohnishi H, Mori T, Okazaki Y, Sujita K, Sakai A. A novel non-invasive mechanical technique of cup and stem placement and leg length adjustment in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hips. Int Orthop. 2015;39(6):1057–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer TW, Hashimoto Y. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(3):305–13.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gonzalez Della Valle A, Shanaghan K, Benson JR, Carroll K, Cross M, Mclawhorn A, et al. Pelvic pitch and roll during total hip arthroplasty performed through a posterolateral approach. A potential source of error in free-hand cup positioning. Int Orthop 2019; 43(8): 1823–9.

Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998;13(5):530–4.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Trivellas A, Rath B, Driessen A, Tingart M, et al. Implant positioning among the surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(8):1115–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):815–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–20.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ezzet KA, McCauley JC. Use of intraoperative X-rays to optimize component position and leg length during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(3):580–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

James CR, Peterson BE, Crim JR, Cook JL, Crist BD. The use of fluoroscopy during direct anterior hip arthroplasty: powerful or misleading? J Arthroplast. 2018;33(6):1775–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wasterlain AS, Buza JA, Thakkar SC, Schwarzkopf R, Vigdorchik J. Navigation and robotics in total hip arthroplasty. JBJS Rev. 2017;5(3):e2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh V, Realyvasquez J, Simcox T, Rozell JC, Schwarzkopf R, Davidovitch RI. Robotics versus navigation versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: does the use of technology yield superior outcomes? J Arthroplast. 2021;36(8):2801–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lei PF, Su SL, Kong LY, Wang CG, Zhong D, Hu YH. Mixed reality combined with three-dimensional printing technology in total hip arthroplasty: an updated review with a preliminary case presentation. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(5):914–20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Su S, Lei P, Wang C, Gao F, Zhong D, Hu Y. Mixed reality technology in total knee arthroplasty: an updated review with a preliminary case report. Front Surg. 2022;9:804029.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kaplan AD, Cruit J, Endsley M, Beers SM, Sawyer BD, Hancock PA. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: a meta-analysis. Hum Factors. 2021;63(4):706–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alexander C, Loeb AE, Fotouhi J, Navab N, Armand M, Khanuja HS. Augmented reality for acetabular component placement in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2020;35(6):1636-41.e3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Logishetty K, Western L, Morgan R, Iranpour F, Cobb JP, Auvinet E. Can an augmented reality headset improve accuracy of acetabular cup orientation in simulated THA? A randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(5):1190–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ogawa H, Hasegawa S, Tsukada S, Matsubara M. A pilot study of augmented reality technology applied to the acetabular cup placement during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(6):1833–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ogawa H, Kurosaka K, Sato A, Hirasawa N, Matsubara M, Tsukada S. Does an augmented reality-based portable navigation system improve the accuracy of acetabular component orientation during THA? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(5):935–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;10: ED000142.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tanino H, Mitsutake R, Takagi K, Ito H. Does a commercially available augmented reality-based portable hip navigation system improve cup positioning during THA compared with the conventional technique? A randomized controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023;10:17.

Google Scholar 

Kurosaka K, Ogawa H, Hirasawa N, Saito M, Nakayama T, Tsukada S. Does augmented reality-based portable navigation improve the accuracy of cup placement in THA compared with accelerometer-based portable navigation? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023;481(8):1515–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fujita M, Hayashi S, Kuroda Y, Nakano N, Maeda T, Matsushita T, et al. Accuracy comparison of cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty using hip align and AR-hip in the supine position. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;21:1–7.

Google Scholar 

Tsukada S, Ogawa H, Hirasawa N, Nishino M, Aoyama H, Kurosaka K. Augmented reality- vs accelerometer-based portable navigation system to improve the accuracy of acetabular cup placement during total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position. J Arthroplast. 2022;37(3):488–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(2):386–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vigdorchik J, Eftekhary N, Elbuluk A, Abdel MP, Buckland AJ, Schwarzkopf RS, et al. Evaluation of the spine is critical in the workup of recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(7):817–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Su S, Wang R, Zhou R, Chen Z, Zhou F. The effectiveness of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality training in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):121.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shaikh HJF, Hasan SS, Woo JJ, Lavoie-Gagne O, Long WJ, Ramkumar PN. Exposure to extended reality and artificial intelligence-based manifestations: a primer on the future of hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):2096–104.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif