Janner, S. F. et al. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 22, 1446–1453 (2011).
Mohan, N., Wolf, J. & Dym, H. Maxillary sinus augmentation. Dent. Clin. North Am. 59, 375–388 (2015).
Aghaloo, T. L. & Moy, P. K. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 22, 49–70 (2007).
Boyne, P. J. & James, R. A. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J. Oral. Surg. 38, 613–616 (1980).
Tatum, H. Jr Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent. Clin. North Am. 30, 207–229 (1986).
Woo, I. & Le, B. T. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent. 13, 28–32 (2004).
Wallace, S. S. et al. Maxillary sinus elevation by lateral window approach: evolution of technology and technique. J. Evid.-based Dent. Pract. 12, 161–171 (2012).
Testori, T., Weinstein, T., Taschieri, S. & Wallace, S. S. Risk factors in lateral window sinus elevation surgery. Periodontology 2000 81, 91–123 (2019).
Summers, R. B. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium (Newtown, Pa.) 15, 154–156, 158 passim; quiz 162 (1994).
Del Fabbro, M., Wallace, S. S. & Testori, T. Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxillary sinus: a systematic review. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 33, 773–783 (2013).
Liu, Y., Ji, P., Fu, G. & Huang, H. Transcrestal sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in 1 to 2 mm residual alveolar bone: a case report. J. Oral Implantol. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00303 (2021).
Pignaton, T. B. et al. Influence of residual bone height and sinus width on the outcome of maxillary sinus bone augmentation using anorganic bovine bone. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 30, 315–323 (2019).
Zhou, W. et al. The effect of anatomy on osteogenesis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic and histological analysis. Clin. Oral. Investig. 25, 5197–5204 (2021).
Kim, Y. K., Lee, J. Y., Park, J. W., Kim, S. G. & Oh, J. S. Sinus membrane elevation by the crestal approach using a novel drilling system. Implant Dent. 26, 351–356 (2017).
Isidori, M., Genty, C., David-Tchouda, S. & Fortin, T. Sinus floor elevation with a crestal approach using a press-fit bone block: a case series. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 44, 1152–1159 (2015).
Trombelli, L., Franceschetti, G., Trisi, P. & Farina, R. Incremental, transcrestal sinus floor elevation with a minimally invasive technique in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy. Clinical and histological findings from a proof-of-concept case series. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 73, 861–888 (2015).
Danesh-Sani, S. A., Loomer, P. M. & Wallace, S. S. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 54, 724–730 (2016).
Pignataro, L., Mantovani, M., Torretta, S., Felisati, G. & Sambataro, G. ENT assessment in the integrated management of candidate for (maxillary) sinus lift. Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Soc. Ital. di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale 28, 110–119 (2008).
Pommer, B., Unger, E., Sütö, D., Hack, N. & Watzek, G. Mechanical properties of the Schneiderian membrane in vitro. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 20, 633–637 (2009).
Wen, S. C., Lin, Y. H., Yang, Y. C. & Wang, H. L. The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during transcrestal sinus lift procedure. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 26, 1158–1164 (2015).
Basma, H. et al. Association between lateral wall thickness and sinus membrane perforation during lateral sinus elevation: A retrospective study. Int. J. Oral. Implantol. 14, 77–85 (2021).
Cho, S. C., Wallace, S. S., Froum, S. J. & Tarnow, D. P. Influence of anatomy on Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus elevation surgery: three-dimensional analysis. Practical Proced. Aesthetic Dent. 13, 160–163 (2001).
Baykul, T. & Fındık, Y. Maxillary sinus perforation with presence of an antral pseudocyst, repaired with platelet rich fibrin. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 4, 205–207 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schwarz, L. et al. Risk factors of membrane perforation and postoperative complications in sinus floor elevation surgery: review of 407 augmentation procedures. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 73, 1275–1282 (2015).
Jensen, O. T., Shulman, L. B., Block, M. S. & Iacono, V. J. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 13, 11–45 (1998).
Avila-Ortiz, G. et al. Analysis of the influence of residual alveolar bone height on sinus augmentation outcomes. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 23, 1082–1088 (2012).
Thoma, D. S., Zeltner, M., Hüsler, J., Hämmerle, C. H. & Jung, R. E. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 26, 154–169 (2015).
Esposito, M. et al. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral. Implantol. 5, 19–33 (2012).
Bechara, S. et al. Short (6-mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (≥10-mm) dental implants: a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 28, 1097–1107 (2017).
Pohl, V. et al. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 44, 438–445 (2017).
Yan, Q., Wu, X., Su, M., Hua, F. & Shi, B. Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open 9, e029826 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jung, R. E. et al. Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 29, 69–77 (2018).
Niu, L., Wang, J., Yu, H. & Qiu, L. New classification of maxillary sinus contours and its relation to sinus floor elevation surgery. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 20, 493–500 (2018).
Gonzalez, S., Tuan, M. C., Ahn, K. M. & Nowzari, H. Crestal approach for maxillary sinus augmentation in patients with ≤4 mm of residual alveolar bone. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 16, 827–835 (2014).
Ramos, A. H. et al. Extra short 4mm implants used to rehabilitation of atrophic posterior mandible. A serial case reports. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 12, e519–e522 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jang, J. W., Chang, H. Y., Pi, S. H., Kim, Y. S. & You, H. K. Alveolar crestal approach for maxillary sinus membrane elevation with <4 mm of residual bone height: a case report. Int. J. Dent. 2018, 1063459 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pommer, B. et al. Primary implant stability in the atrophic sinus floor of human cadaver maxillae: impact of residual ridge height, bone density, and implant diameter. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 25, e109–e113 (2014).
Leighton, Y., Carpio, L., Weber, B., Dias, F. J. & Borie, E. Clinical evaluation of single 4-mm implants in the posterior mandible: A 3-year follow-up pilot study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 127, 80–85 (2022).
Călin, C., Petre, A. & Drafta, S. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 29, 558–576 (2014).
Rios, H. F., Avila, G., Galindo, P., Bratu, E. & Wang, H. L. The influence of remaining alveolar bone upon lateral window sinus augmentation implant survival. Implant Dent. 18, 402–412 (2009).
Danesh-Sani, S. A., Movahed, A., ElChaar, E. S., Chong Chan, K. & Amintavakoli, N. Radiographic evaluation of maxillary sinus lateral wall and posterior superior alveolar artery anatomy: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 19, 151–160 (2017).
Monje, A. et al. Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and morphologic patterns in the atrophic posterior maxilla. J. Periodontol. 85, 676–682 (2014).
Boreak, N., Maketone, P., Mourlaas, J., Wang, W. & Yu, Y. Decision tree to minimize intra-operative complications during maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. J Oral Biol. 5, 8 (2018).
Ella, B. et al. Vascular connections of the lateral wall of the sinus: surgical effect in sinus augmentation. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 23, 1047–1052 (2008).
Rosano, G., Taschieri, S., Gaudy, J. F., Weinstein, T. & Del Fabbro, M. Maxillary sinus vascular anatomy and its relation to sinus
Comments (0)