Adadan, E., & Savasci, F. (2012). An analysis of 16–17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 513–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.636084

Article  Google Scholar 

Akaygun, S. (2016). Is the oxygen atom static or dynamic? The effect of generating animations on students’ mental models of atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 788–807. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00067C

Article  Google Scholar 

Akaygun, S. (2015). Visualization of unseen: the use of dynamic computer visualizations in chemistry education [Görünmeyeni görselleştirme: Kimya eğitiminde hareketli bilgisayar görsellerinin kullanımı]. In Ayas A. & Sözbilir, M. (Eds.), Teaching of chemistry: Good practice eaxmples for faculties, teachers and pre-service teachers [Kimya öğretimi: Öğretmen eğitimcileri, öğretmenler ve öğretmen adayları için iyi uygulama örnekleri] (pp. 679–711). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Akpinar, E. (2014). The use of interactive computer animations based on POE as a presentation tool in primary science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9482-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Hajri, S. H. (2014). Associating animations with concrete models to enhance students’ comprehension of different visual representations in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00074E

Article  Google Scholar 

Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia‐based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20005

Article  Google Scholar 

Azizoglu, N., Alkan, M., & Geban, Ö. (2006). Undergraduate pre-service teachers’ understandings and misconceptions of phase equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(6), 947–953. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p947

Article  Google Scholar 

Bain, G. A., Yi, J., Beikmohamadi, M., Herman, T. M., & Patrick, M. A. (2006). Using physical models of biomolecular structures to teach concepts of biochemical structure and structure depiction in the introductory chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(9), 1322. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1322

Article  Google Scholar 

Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56(3), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.025

Article  Google Scholar 

Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. J. (1999). High-school chemistry students’ performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009436509753

Article  Google Scholar 

Bell, R.L., & Smetana, L.K. (2008). Using computer simulations to enhance science teaching and learning. In R.L., Bell, J. Gess-Newsome, & J. Luft, (Eds.), Technology in the secondary science classroom. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Article  Google Scholar 

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Article  Google Scholar 

Calik, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). A Cross-Age study on the understanding of chemical solutions and their components. International Education Journal, 6(1), 30–41.

Google Scholar 

Calik, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R.K. (2010). Investigating the effectiveness of teaching methods based on a four-step constructivist strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology,19(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9176-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Cetinkaya, U., & Kirilmazkaya, G. (2022). The effect of POE method with PhET simulation on primary school student’s science attitudes and success: Greenhouse Effect. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(4), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/3hbf7

ChemDemos (2012).UO Libraries Interactive Media Group. https://chemdemos.uoregon.edu/

Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1904_3

Article  Google Scholar 

Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004445

Article  Google Scholar 

Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164

Article  Google Scholar 

Correia, A. P., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., & Phye, G. (2019). The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level: Secondary school students’ perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1487834

Article  Google Scholar 

Costu, B. (2008). Learning science through the PDEODE teaching strategy: Helping students make sense of everyday situations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75300

Costu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation. Instructional Science, 40, 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Dori, Y. J., & Barak, M. (2001). Virtual and physical molecular modeling: Fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), 61–74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.4.1.61

Duit, R. & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016

Article  Google Scholar 

Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Retrieved 10 July 2020 from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/memory6.htm

Erdem Ozcan, G., & Uyanik, G. (2022). The effects of the “Predict-Observe-Explain (POE)” strategy on academic achievement, attitude and retention in science learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(3), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202215535

Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development and application of three-tier heat and temperature test: Sample of bachelor and graduate students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 53–76.

Google Scholar 

Falvo, D. (2008). Animations and simulations for teaching and learning molecular chemistry. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 68–77

Google Scholar 

Fensham, P. J., & Kass, H. (1988). Inconsistent or discrepant events in science instruction. Studies in Science Education,15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268808559946

Article  Google Scholar 

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R. & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman

Google Scholar 

Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070333

Article  Google Scholar 

Glynn, S.M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N. & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

Article  Google Scholar 

Haidar, A. H., & Abraham, M. R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660281004

Article  Google Scholar 

Haysom, J. & Bowen, M. (2010). Predict, observe, explain: Activities enhancing scientific understanding. NSTA Press

Hong, J. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2021). Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward “predict-observe-explain” online science inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 166, 104172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104172

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Google Scholar 

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Karamustafaoglu, S., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2015). Understanding electrochemistry concepts using the predict-observe-explain strategy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1364a

Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34, 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3

Article  Google Scholar 

Kearney, M. (2004). Classroom use of multimedia-supported predict–observe–explain tasks in a social constructivist learning environment. Research in science education, 34, 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-8795-y

Article  Google Scholar 

Kearney, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Constructivism as a referent in the design and development of a computer program using interactive digital video to enhance learning in physics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1773

Kearney, M., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. G. (2001). Student and teacher perceptions of the use of multimedia supported predict–observe–explain tasks to probe understanding. Research in Science Education 31, 589–615. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013106209449

Article  Google Scholar 

Kelly, R. M., & Jones, L. L. (2007). Exploring how different features of animations of sodium chloride dissolution affect students’ explanations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9065-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York London: The Guilford Press

Google Scholar 

Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299087

Article  Google Scholar 

Krause, S., & Isaacs-Sodeye, W. (2013). The Effect of a Visually-Based Intervention on Students’ Misconceptions Related to Solutions, Solubility and Saturation in a Core Materials Course. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.

Krause, S., & Tasooji, A. (2007). Diagnosing students’ misconceptions on solubility and saturation for understanding of phase diagrams. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics, Use and Interpretation. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah.

Google Scholar 

Liew, C.-W. (2004). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain technique in diagnosing students’ understanding of science and identifying their level of achievement. [Doctoral Thesis, Curtin University of Technology].

Liew, C. W., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain tasks in diagnosing students' understanding of science and in identifying their levels of achievement. Annual Meeting of The AERA, San Diego, CA.

m3lls34 (2011, May 24). Super saturated solutions [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y3bKIOkcmk&t=47s

Marbach‐Ad, G., Rotbain, Y., & Stavy, R. (2008). Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20222

Article  Google Scholar 

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4

Article  Google Scholar 

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence based inquiry (6th ed). New York, Pearson Education.

Google Scholar 

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191

Article  Google Scholar 

Napier, J. D., & Riley, J. P. (1985). Relationship between affective determinants and achievement in science for seventeen-year-olds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220407

Article  Google Scholar 

National Research Council (1997). Science Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/5287