Balota, D., Pilotti, M, & Cortese, M. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29(4). 639-647. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200465

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12903648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149

Barsalou, L. W. (2007). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

Barsalou, L.W. (2010). Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future. Topics in Cognitive Science,2, 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x

Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3

Begg, I. (1973). Imagery and integration in the recall of words. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082465

Begg, I. & Robertson, R. (1973). Imagery and Long-Term Retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80049-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80049-0

Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W. & Storms, G. (2014). Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010

Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A.B. & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behaviour Research Methods, 46(3), 904-911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (2004). Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195584

Connell, L. & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125, 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010

Filipović Đurđević, D. Popović Stijačić, M. & Karapandžić, J. (2016). A quest for sources of perceptual richness: Several candidates. Studies in language and mind: Selected papers from the 3rd workshop in psycholinguistic, neurolinguistic and clinical linguistic research, Edited by Sabina Halupka-Rešetar and Silvia Martínez-Ferreiro, Faculty of Philosophy, Novi Sad, 187-238. http://digitalna.ff.uns.ac.rs/sites/default/files/db/books/978-86-6065-359-0.pdf

Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in recall. U G.H. Bower & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 5, 129-193), New York, Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60441-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60441-7

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2714

Horowitz, L. M., & Prytulak, L. S. (1969). Redintegrative memory. Psychological Review, 76, 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028139

Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000130

Kostić, Đ. (1999). Frekvencijski rečnik savremenog srpskog jezika. Tom I – VII. Institut za eksperimentalnu fonetiku i patologiju govora Beograd i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.

Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007

Kousta, S.-T-, Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D.P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,140(1), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446

Lynott, D. & Connell, L. (2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behaviour Research Methods, 45, 516-526. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0

Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2019). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ktjwp

Marschark, M., & Hunt, R. R. (1989). A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 710-720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.710

Marschark, M. & Surian, L. (1992). Concreteness effects in free recall: The roles of imaginal and relational processing. Memory & Cognition, 20, 612-620. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202711

Mathôt, S., Schreij, D. & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavioral Research Method, 44, 314-324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7

Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H. and Bates, D. (2018). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.00 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001

Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002

Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366

Murdock, B. B. Jr. (1962). The retention of individual items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 618-625. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043657

Nelson, D. L. & Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90013-N DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90013-N

Paivio, A. (1965). Abstractness, Imagery, and Meaningfulness in Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(4), 32–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80064-0

Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027272

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295

Paivio, A. (2008). Mental Representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001

Paivio, A. (2013). Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: A criticial review of Kousta et al. (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027004

Paivio, A., Clark, J. M., & Khan, M. (1988). Effects of concreteness and semantic relatedness on composite imagery ratings and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 16, 422-430. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214222

Paivio, A., & Sadoski, M. (2011). Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: Commentary on elman (2009) from the perspective of dual coding theory. Cognitive Science, 35(1), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01146.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01146.x

Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, A. M. (1968). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025327

Paivio, A., Walsh, M., & Bons, T. (1994). Concreteness Effects on Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(5), 1196–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1196

Pecher, D. & Zeelenberg, R. (2008). Embodied Knowledge. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0100

Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14(404), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429

Pecher, D., van Dantzig, S., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2009). Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 914–919. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.914

Popović Stijačić, M., Mihić, Lj, & Filipović Đurđević, D. (2018). Analysing data from memory tasks: comparison of ANOVA, logistic regression and mixed logit model. Psihologija, 51(3), 259-287. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170615023P DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170615023P

R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

https://www.R-project.org.

Reilly, J., Hung, J. & Westbury, C. (2017). Non-Arbitrariness in Mapping Word Form to Meaning: Cross-Linguistic Formal Markers of Word Concreteness. Cognitive Science, 41(4), 1071-1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12361

Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8

Schwanenflugel, P., Akin, C., & Luh, W.-M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208259

Schwanenflugel, P., & Shoben, E. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, Vol 9(1), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82

Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods, 49(6), 2204–2218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3

Popović Stijačić, M., & Filipović Đurđević, D. (2015). Uspešnost reprodukcije u zavisnosti od broja čula kojima je moguće iskusiti pojam. Primenjena psihologija, 8(3), 335-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2015.3.335-352. [Number of sensory modalities through which a concept can be experienced: effect on recall] DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2015.3.335-352

Vergallito, A., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01337-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01337-8

Živanović, J., & Filipović Đurđević, D. (2011). On advantage of seeing text and hearing speech. Psihologija, 44(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1602211E DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1101061Z