Alwin, D.F., and J.A. Krosnick. 1991. Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology 97 (1): 169–195.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bailey, A.H., A. Williams, and A. Cimpian. 2022. Based on billions of words on the internet, people= men. Science Advances 8 (13): eabm2463.

Article  Google Scholar 

Belle, D., A.B. Tartarilla, M. Wapman, M. Schlieber, and A.E. Mercurio. 2021. I can’t operate, that boy is my son!”: Gender schemas and a classic riddle. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01211-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bem, S. L. 1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Yale University Press.

Block, N. 1996. Mental paint and mental latex. Philosophical Issues, 7 (Perception), 19–49.

Chalmers, D. J. 1996. The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.

Dretske, F. 1995. Naturalizing the mind. MIT Press.

Book  Google Scholar 

Fodor, J. A. 1975. The language of thought. Harvard University Press.

Google Scholar 

Fodor, J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. MIT Press.

Formato, F. 2019. An overview of grammatical gender in Italian. In Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian (pp. 39–80). Palgrave Macmillan.

Gabriel, U., P. Gygax, O. Sarrasin, A. Garnham, and J. Oakhill. 2008. Au-pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French and German. Behavior Research Methods 40: 206–212.

Article  Google Scholar 

Garnham, A., U. Gabriel, O. Sarrasin, P. Gygax, and J. Oakhill. 2012. Gender representation in different languages and grammatical marking on pronouns: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics remain men. Discourse Processes 49 (6): 481–500.

Article  Google Scholar 

Giovine, M. (2026). Reconciling inclusion and accessibility: Solutions for non-binary linguistic strategies in grammatical gender languages. Language Sciences, 113, 101778.

Gygax, P., and U. Gabriel. 2008. Can a group of musicians be composed of women? Generic interpretation of French masculine role names in the absence and presence of feminine forms. Swiss Journal of Psychology 67 (3): 143–151.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gygax, P., U. Gabriel, O. Sarrasin, J. Oakhill, and A. Garnham. 2008. Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes 23 (3): 464–485.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gygax, P., U. Gabriel, A. Lévy, E. Pool, M. Grivel, and E. Pedrazzini. 2012. The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24 (4): 395–408.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gygax, P.M., L. Schoenhals, A. Lévy, P. Luethold, and U. Gabriel. 2019. Exploring the onset of a male-biased interpretation of masculine generics among French speaking kindergarten children. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1225.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gygax, P., S. Sato, A. Öttl, and U. Gabriel. 2021. The masculine form in grammatically gendered languages and its multiple interpretations: A challenge for our cognitive system. Language Sciences 83: 101328.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hamilton, M.C. 1991. Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: People= male, male= people. Psychology of Women Quarterly 15 (3): 393–402.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hendriks, I., M. Lubbers, and P. Scheepers. 2024. Individual change in rejection of equal opportunities for foreigners among adolescents and young adults in Switzerland: Testing realistic conflict theory from a dynamic perspective. PLoS One 19 (2): e0296883.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hentschel, T., L.K. Horvath, C. Peus, and S. Sczesny. 2018. Kick-starting female careers. Journal of Personnel Psychology 17 (4): 193–203.

Article  Google Scholar 

Irmen, L., and J. Kurovskaja. 2010. On the semantic content of grammatical gender and its impact on the representation of human referents. Experimental Psychology 57: 367–375.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jubas, K. 2013. Grey(’s) identity: Complications of learning and becoming in a popular television show. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 35 (2): 127–143.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kollmayer, M., A. Pfaffel, B. Schober, and L. Brandt. 2018. Breaking away from the male stereotype of a specialist: Gendered language affects performance in a thinking task. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 985.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kousta, S.T., D.P. Vinson, and G. Vigliocco. 2008. Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 (4): 843–858.

Google Scholar 

Kriegel, U. (Ed.). 2013. Phenomenal intentionality. Oxford University Press.

Lindsay, J. 2023. Male default: When images of neutral characters from picture books are not so neutral. Gender Issues 40 (1): 119–143.

Article  Google Scholar 

Linscheid, L.J., E.B. Holliday, A. Ahmed, J.S. Somerson, S. Hanson, R. Jagsi, and C. Deville Jr. 2020. Women in academic surgery over the last four decades. PLoS One 15 (12): e0243308.

Menegatti, M., & Rubini, M. (2017). Gender bias and sexism in language. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press.

Merritt, R.D., and C.J. Kok. 1995. Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people= male hypothesis. Sex Roles 33: 145–157.

Article  Google Scholar 

Misersky, J., P.M. Gygax, P. Canal, U. Gabriel, A. Garnham, F. Braun, Tania Chiarini, Kjellrun Englund, Adriana Hanulikova, Anton Öttl, Jana Valdrova, Lisa Von Stockhausen, and S. Sczesny. 2014. Norms on the gender perception of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak. Behavior Research Methods 46: 841–871.

Article  Google Scholar 

Morehouse, K.N., B. Kurdi, E. Hakim, and M.R. Banaji. 2022. When a stereotype dumbfounds: Probing the nature of the surgeon= male belief. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 3: 100044.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moulton, J., G.M. Robinson, and C. Elias. 1978. Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren’t. American Psychologist 33 (11): 1032–1036.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moulton, J. 1981. The myth of the neutral “man.” In Sexist Language: A Modern Philosophical Analysis, ed. M. Vetterling-Braggin, 100–116. Adams: Littlefield.

Nitti, P. 2021. Feminine-specific job titles: A research on sexism in the Italian language. Modern Italy 26 (1): 1–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pabst, L.M., and M. Kollmayer. 2023. How to make a difference: The impact of gender-fair language on text comprehensibility amongst adults with and without an academic background. Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1234860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1234860.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pitt, D. 2020. Mental representation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/mental-representation/

Pulijana, J., & Stevens, G. (2023). What’s so bad about being a manageress? Inquiry, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2177727

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. MIT Press.

Redl, T., S.L. Frank, P. De Swart, and H. De Hoop. 2021. The male bias of a generically-intended masculine pronoun: Evidence from eye-tracking and sentence evaluation. PLoS One 16 (4): e0249309.

Article  Google Scholar 

Reynolds, D., A. Garnham, and J. Oakhill. 2006. Evidence of immediate activation of gender information from a social role name. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (5): 886–903.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rosola, M., Frenda, S., Cignarella, A. T., Pellegrini, M., Marra, A., & Floris, M. (2023). Beyond Obscuration and Visibility: Thoughts on the Different Strategies of Gender-Fair Language in Italian. In CLiC-it 2023. Proceedings of the 9th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics. Venice, Italy, November 30-December 2, 2023 (Vol. 3596, pp. 1–10). CEUR-WS.

Schärer, F. 2008. Père, mère, roi et sorcière: la représentation des deux sexes et de la catégorie du genre dans les manuels scolaires de l’école primaire de la Suisse alémanique et de la Suisse romande (Vol. 327). Peter Lang.

Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. 1973. Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. The American Sociologist, 12–18.

Schunack, S., and A. Binanzer. 2022. Revisiting gender-fair language and stereotypes–A comparison of word pairs, capital i forms and the asterisk. Zeitschrift Für Sprachwissenschaft 41 (2): 309–337.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sczesny, S., M. Formanowicz, and F. Moser. 2016. Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in Psychology 7: 154379.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shu, X., and K.D. Meagher. 2018. Beyond the stalled gender revolution: Historical and cohort dynamics in gender attitudes from 1977 to 2016. Social Forces 96 (3): 1243–1274.

Article  Google Scholar 

Skorinko, J. L. M. 2018. Riddle me this: Using riddles that violate gender stereotypes to demonstrate the pervasiveness of stereotypes. Psychology Learning & Teaching 17 (2): 194–208.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stoeger, H., A. Ziegler, and H. David. 2004. What is a specialist? Effects of the male concept of a successful academic person on performance in a thinking task. Psychology Science 46 (4): 514–530.

Google Scholar 

Stout, J.G., and N. Dasgupta. 2011. When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37 (6): 757–769.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sulis, G., and V. Gheno. 2022. The debate on language and gender in Italy, from the visibility of women to inclusive language (1980s–2020s). The Italianist 42 (1): 153–183.

Article  Google Scholar 

Swim, J.K., K.J. Aikin, W.S. Hall, and B.A. Hunter. 1995. Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 199–214.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vergoossen, H.P., E.A. Renström, A. Lindqvist, and M. Gustafsson Sendén. 2020. Four dimensions of criticism against gender-fair language. Sex Roles 83: 328–337.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vervecken, D., and B. Hannover. 2015. Yes I can! Effects of gender fair job descriptions on children’s perceptions of job status, job difficulty, and vocational self-efficacy. Social Psychology 46: 76–92.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vigliocco, G., and J. Franck. 1999. When sex and syntax go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 40 (4): 455–478.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vigliocco, G., D.P. Vinson, F. Paganelli, and K. Dworzynski. 2005. Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (4): 501–520.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wardle, S.G., S. Paranjape, J. Taubert, and C.I. Baker. 2022. Illusory faces are more likely to be perceived as male than female. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119 (5): e2117413119.

Article  Google Scholar