Self-Reported Symptoms Enable Four-Phase Menstrual Cycle Classification with Hormonally Validated Labels

Abstract

Accurate inference of physiological state across the menstrual cycle has important applications in reproductive health and in understanding symptom dynamics, yet most non-hormonal approaches rely on wearable sensors or calendar-based tracking. Whether self-reported symptoms alone can support prospective, cross-subject phase classification remains unresolved. Here, we introduce a hybrid modelling framework that combines a gradient-boosted classifier with a Hidden Semi-Markov Model to infer four menstrual cycle phases (menstrual, follicular, fertile, and luteal) from self-reported data. The classifier captures non-linear symptom patterns, while the temporal model imposes biologically grounded constraints, including cyclic ordering and realistic phase durations. In a leave-one-subject-out evaluation using hormonally annotated data from 41 participants, the model achieved 67.6% accuracy and a macro F1 score of 0.662. Features reflecting short-term symptom variability were more informative than absolute symptom levels, indicating that within-person fluctuation provides a more generalisable signal of cycle phase than symptom intensity alone. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of low-burden, device-free menstrual health monitoring, establish symptom dynamics as a basis for scalable digital biomarkers, and expand access to tracking in resource-constrained settings and populations underserved by wearable-based approaches.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by an Innovate UK grant (BodyMirror AI+: 10173207) and by a PhD grant from the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) under project reference 17223919/MMS/Industrial Fellowship.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study used only openly available human data from the mcPHASES dataset, hosted on PhysioNet: https://physionet.org/content/mcphases/1.0.0/

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Comments (0)

No login
gif