Background: CD276 has been proposed as a candidate gene associated with the biological characteristics of meningioma, but its predictive position and interpretive significance within a transcriptomic classifier have not yet been clearly established. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate CD276 stepwise across internal model development, external validation, calibration, decision-analytic assessment, feature stability, and robustness analyses using public transcriptomic cohorts. Methods: The analyses in this study were organized into two interconnected notebooks. In Notebook A, we reconstructed the internal training cohort (GSE183653), evaluated the CD276 single-gene signal, and then developed a transcriptome-wide multigene classifier. We also performed permutation importance, bootstrap confidence interval, label permutation test, repeated cross-validation, CD276 ablation, and internal calibration analyses. In Notebook B, we reproduced the external validation cohort (GSE136661) in a fixed common-gene space, applied train-only recalibration and train-only threshold transfer, and extended the interpretation through decision curve analysis, stability analysis, enrichment analysis, and one-factor-at-a-time robustness analysis. Results: The internal training cohort consisted of 185 samples and 58,830 genes, of which 25 were WHO grade III cases. CD276 expression showed a significant association with WHO grade, but the internal discrimination of the CD276-only baseline was limited (ROC-AUC 0.628, average precision 0.323, balanced accuracy 0.540). In contrast, the initial transcriptome-wide model showed ROC-AUC 0.834 and PR-AUC 0.509, and under 5-fold cross-validation, the canonical fulltranscriptome model and the CD276-forced 5,001-feature branch showed mean ROC-AUC/PR-AUC of 0.854/0.564 and 0.855/0.606, respectively, outperforming the CD276-only baseline at 0.644/0.391. CD276 was not included in the initial 5,000-feature filtered set and ranked 900th among 5,001 features even in the forcibly included 5,001-feature branch. In paired ablation analysis, the performance difference attributable to inclusion of CD276 was effectively close to zero (delta ROCAUC 0.000062, delta PR-AUC 0.000056). Internal calibration analysis showed an overconfident probability pattern (Brier score 0.10501, intercept -1.421392, slope 0.413241). In external validation, the fixed multigene pipeline achieved ROC-AUC 0.928 and PR-AUC 0.335. Train-only recalibration improved calibration metrics while preserving discrimination, and decision curve analysis showed threshold-dependent but limited external utility. Stability analysis showed overlap between core-stable genes and high-impact genes, but CD276 was not supported as a dominant stable core feature and remained in the target-of-interest tier. In robustness analysis, some perturbations preserved the primary interpretation, whereas others revealed transform sensitivity or an alternative high-performing feature-space solution. Conclusions: CD276 is a gene of interest associated with meningioma grade, but it was difficult to interpret it as a strong standalone predictor or a dominant stable classifier feature. In this study, the main basis of predictive performance lay not in CD276 alone but in a broader multigene transcriptomic structure, and probability output needed to be interpreted conservatively with calibration taken into account. These findings position CD276 not as a direct single-gene classifier but as a biologymotivated target-of-interest that should be interpreted within a broader transcriptomic program.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study used only publicly available human data that were originally available prior to study initiation from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The datasets used were GSE183653 and GSE136661, which can be accessed at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE183653 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE136661. No newly collected human data, patient contact, intervention, or non-public dataset access was involved.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes